Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 March 2018
In 1924, the British biologist J.B.S. Haldane acknowledged that anyone who tried to predict where science was taking us was obliged to mention H.G. Wells, since ‘[t]he very mention of the future suggests him’. Nevertheless, Haldane complained that Wells was ‘a generation behind the time’, having been raised when flying and radiotelegraphy were genuinely scientific questions, but they were now mere ‘commercial problems’, Haldane asserted, and ‘I believe that the centre of scientific interest lies in biology’. Haldane's conviction that biology was the key to the future was widely shared, and lies in the background of both these books. Helen Curry examines the early history of the dream of engineering new kinds of plants, using first X-rays, then colchicine (a chemical mutagen), and then the new sources of intense radioactivity that were created by the early nuclear reactors. By contrast, Ewa Luczak is interested in the influence of eugenics on American literature, focusing particularly on Jack London, Charlotte Perkins Gilman and George Schuyler. What unites these books (and the diverse topics they address) is new ways of imagining the future, specifically a future based in biology.
1 Haldane, J.B.S., Daedalus; Or, Science and the Future, 1st edn (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd, 1924), pp. 9–10 Google Scholar.
2 Bacon, Francis, New Atlantis and the Great Instauration, ed. Weinberger, Jerry (Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson, 1989), p. 74Google Scholar.
3 John Elfreth Watkins, ‘Creation of species: work done at Station of Experimental Evolution’, New-York Tribune, 24 February 1907, p. 2 (Library of Congress, Chronicling America, available at http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1907-02-24/ed-1/seq-18).
4 Davenport, Charles Benedict et al. , ‘Addresses at opening of the Station for Experimental Evolution, June 11, 1904’, Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book (1905) 3, p. 39Google Scholar. For a fuller account of the early reception of the mutation theory see Allen, Garland E., ‘Hugo De Vries and the reception of the “mutation theory”’, Journal of the History of Biology (1969) 2(1), pp. 55–87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Endersby, Jim, A Guinea Pig's History of Biology: The Plants and Animals Who Taught Us the Facts of Life, London: William Heinemann, 2007 Google Scholar.
5 de Vries, Hugo, ‘The origin of species by mutation’, Science (1902) 15(384), pp. 723–724 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
6 Brewster, E.T., ‘Breeding plants and animals to order’, World's Work (1907) 15(2), pp. 9653–9658 Google Scholar, 9657.
7 Campos, Luis, Radium and the Secret of Life, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, reviewed in BJHS (2017) 50(3), pp. 537–543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Watkins, op. cit. (3).