¹ Crom, T., Trade Catalogues – 1542 to 1842, Florida, 1989, 66–71.Google Scholar

² Langford, P., A Polite and Commercial People: England 1727–1783, Oxford, 1989, especially 1–6.Google Scholar

³ Clark, J. C. D., English Society 1688–1832, Cambridge, 1985Google Scholar. Compare, for example, Langford, , op. cit. (2)Google Scholar or McKendrick, N., Brewer, J. and Plumb, J. H., The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England, London, 1982.Google Scholar

⁴ McKendrick, N., ‘Introduction’Google Scholar, in McKendrick, , Brewer, and Plumb, , op. cit. (3), 1–8Google Scholar. For contrasting views, see the essays in Brewer, J. and Porter, R. (eds.), Consumption and the World of Goods, London and New York, 1993Google Scholar; the editors' introduction (1–15) reviews the literature.

⁵ Hargrave, C., A History of Playing Cards and a Bibliography of Cards and Gaming, London, 1930, 169–222.Google Scholar

⁶ Colley, L., Britons: Forging the Nation 1707–1837, Newhaven, 1992, 55–100Google Scholar. Borsay, P., The English Urban Renaissance, Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar

⁷ Davidoff, L. and Hall, C., Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1950, London, 1987Google Scholar. Barker-Benfield, G., The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar

⁸ Stewart, L., The Rise of Public Science, Cambridge, 1992Google Scholar; Golinski, J., Science and Public Culture, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar

⁹ Fara, P., ‘“Master of Practical Magnetics”: the construction of an eighteenth-century natural philosopher’, Enlightenment and Dissent, forthcoming.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Lippincott, L., Selling Art in Georgian London, London, 1983.Google Scholar

¹¹ Porter, R., ‘William Hunter: a surgeon and a gentleman’, in William Hunter and the Eighteenth-Century Medical World (ed. Bynum, W. and Porter, R.), Cambridge, 1985, 7–34.Google Scholar

¹² Schaffer, S., ‘Natural philosophy and public spectacle in the eighteenth century’, History of Science (1983), 21, 1–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Castle, T., ‘The female thermometer’, Representations (1987), 17, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³ Pumfrey, S., ‘Mechanising magnetism in Restoration England – the decline of magnetic philosophy’, Annals of Science (1987), 44, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ Fara, P., ‘Magnetic England in the Eighteenth Century’, Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1993.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Browne, T., The Works of Thomas Browne, volume 2 (ed. Keynes, G.), London, 1964, 107–9Google Scholar; Rees, A., Cyclopædia: Or, an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, 4 vols., London, 1778, iiiGoogle Scholar, entry on Mahometanism. See also p. 229 of Prior, M., ‘Alma: or, the progress of the mind’, in Poems on Several Occasions (ed. Waller, A.), Cambridge, 1905, 209–54Google Scholar, and Kunz, G. F., The Curious Lore of Precious Stones, Philadelphia, 1913, 93–4.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Schaffer, S., ‘Godly men and mechanical philosophers: souls and spirits in Restoration philosophy’, Science in Context (1987), 1, 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Boswell, J., Boswell's Life of Johnson (ed. Hill, G. and Powell, L.), 6 vols., Oxford, 1934–1950, ii, 438Google Scholar. Landow, G., Images of Crisis, Boston, 1982, 35–130.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Folkes, M., ‘Copley medal presentation speech’, Royal Society Journal Book (copy) (1747), 19, 359–67, quotation from 366.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Goldsmith, M. M., Private Vices, Public Benefits, Cambridge, 1985, 1–27Google Scholar; Sekora, J., Luxury: The Concept in Western Thought, Eden to Smollett, Baltimore and London, 1977, 63–131.Google Scholar

²⁰ Fletcher, A., A Discourse of Government with Relation to Militia's, Edinburgh, 1698, 12Google Scholar. See Schaffer, S., ‘Defoe's natural philosophy and the worlds of credit’, in Nature Transfigured (ed. Christie, J. and Shuttleworth, S.), Manchester, 1989, 13–44Google Scholar; Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian Moment, Princeton, 1975, 427–31.Google Scholar

²¹ Cheyne, G., The English Malady, New York, 1976, 34.Google Scholar

²² Johnson, S., The Rambler, 3 vols., New Haven, 1969, iii, 271–6Google Scholar. In his choice of genre, Johnson may have been influenced by an erotic account of William Watson's electrical experiments: Strong-Cock, P., Teague-Root Display'd: Being some Useful and Important Discoveries Tending to Illustrate the Doctrine of Electricity, in a Letter From Paddy Strong-Cock, Fellow of Drury-Lane, and Professor of Natural Philosophy in M King's College, Covent Garden, to W-M W-N, FRS Author of a Late Pamphlet on that Subject, London, 1746.Google Scholar

²³ Swift, J., Gulliver's Travels, London, 1966, 163–205Google Scholar. Particularly relevant commentaries include: Nicolson, M. and Mohler, N., ‘The scientific background of Swift's Voyage to Laputa’, Annals of Science (1937), 2, 299–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nicolson, M. and Mohler, N., ‘Swift's “flying island” in the voyage to Laputa’, Annals of Science (1937), 2, 405–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Korshin, P., ‘The intellectual context of Swift's flying island’, Philological Quarterly (1971), 50, 630–46Google Scholar; Christie, J., ‘Laputa revisited’Google Scholar, in Christie, and Shuttleworth, , op. cit. (20), 45–60Google Scholar; Rogers, P., ‘Gulliver and the engineers’, Modern Language Review (1975), 70, 260–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Todd, D., ‘Laputa, the whore of Babylon, and the idols of science’, Studies in Philology (1978), 75, 93–120.Google Scholar

²⁴ Petty, W., ‘The discourse made before the Royal Society, the 26 November 1674’, Royal Society Register Book (copy) (1674), 3, 335–61 (see 356)Google Scholar. Hamilton, J., Calculations and Tables Relating to the Attractive Virtue of Loadstones, 1729 (summarized in Philosophical Transactions (1730), 36, 245–50).Google Scholar

²⁵ Pomian, K., Collectors and Curiosities: Paris and Venice, 1500–1800, Cambridge, 1990Google Scholar. Daston, L., ‘The factual sensibility’, Isis (1988), 79, 452–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁶ Croker, T. H., Williams, T. and Clark, S., The Complete Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, 3 vols., London, 1773, iiGoogle Scholar, entry on magnet; Mottelay, P. F., Bibliographical History of Electricity and Magnetism, Chronologically Arranged, London, 1922, 134, 159Google Scholar; Stone, E., The Construction and Principle Uses of Mathematical Instruments Translated from the French of M Bion, London, 1758, 305Google Scholar. Wilson, B., ‘Autobiography’, unpublished manuscript at the National Portrait Gallery, London, 1783, 16–17.Google Scholar

²⁷ Letter to Pope, Alexander of 10 10 1716Google Scholar, reproduced in Pope, A., The Correspondence of Alexander Pope (ed. Sherburn, G.), 5 vols., Oxford, 1956, i, 365Google Scholar–6. Lister, M., ‘A journey to Paris in the year 1698’, in A General Collection of the Best and Most interesting Voyages and Travels in all Parts of the World, Many of Which are Now Translated into English (ed. Pinkerton, J.), 17 vols., London, 1808–1814, iv, 1–76 (see 26–8)Google Scholar. Evelyn, J., The Diary of John Evelyn, 6 vols., Oxford, iii, 110–11Google Scholar (in Latin, , magnusGoogle Scholar means great and magnes means magnet).

²⁸ Wallis, H., ‘Geographie is better than divinitie: maps, globes, and geography in the days of Samuel Pepys’ in The Compleat Plattmaker (ed. Thrower, N.), Berkeley, 1978, 1–43 (see 39).Google Scholar

²⁹ Gunther, R. W. T., Early Science in Oxford, 19 vols., Oxford (1920–1945), i, 306–7Google Scholar; Ovenell, R., The Ashmolean Museum 1683–1894, Oxford, 1986, 149.Google Scholar

³⁰ Zacharias von Uffenbach: see Quarrell, W. H. and Mare, M., London in 1710 From the Travels of Zacharias Conrad von Uffenbach, London, 1934, 99Google Scholar. The first item the ‘Elaboratory-Keepers’ at ‘Wise-Acres Hall’ showed Ned Ward was the Society's magnet: Ward, N., The London-Spy Compleat, London, 1924, 59–60Google Scholar. The museum had several loadstones, one of them weighing 60 pounds: see Grew, N., Musæum Regalis Societatis, London, 1681, 317Google Scholar and Bennett, J. A., The Mathematical Science of Christopher Wren, Cambridge, 1982, 44–54.Google Scholar

³¹ Royal Society Journal Book (copy) (1721), 12, 203–4Google Scholar. Pettus, J., Fleta Minor. The Laws of Art and Nature, in Knowing, Judging, Assaying, Fining, Refining and Inlarging the Bodies of Confin'd Metals, 1683, London, book 2, entry on loadstone.Google Scholar

³² A long rhyming advertisement for Stone, J. of Mallet, Shepton is in the Lysons Collectanea, British Library (shelf mark c.103.k.11), 2 vols., ii (2), 201.Google Scholar

³³ Higgins, K., ‘The classification of sundials’, Annals of Science (1953), 9, 342–58 (see 342–5, 350–1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gouk, P., The Ivory Sundials of Nuremberg, Cambridge, 1988, 9–24.Google Scholar

³⁴ For their European impact, see Home, R. W. and Connor, P. J., Æpinus's Essay on the Theory of Electricity and Magnetism, Princeton, 1979, 137–86.Google Scholar

³⁵ Knight, G., A Collection of Some Papers Formerly Published in the Philosophical Transactions, Relating to the Use of Dr Knight's Magnetical Bars with Some Notes and Additions, London, 1758.Google Scholar

³⁶ Letter to Colden, Cadwallader of 26 04 1745Google Scholar, reproduced in Colden, C., The Letters and Papers of Cadiwallader Colden, 9 vols., New York, 1917–1923, iii, 113–15, quotation from 114.Google Scholar

³⁷ Bijker, W. E., ‘The social construction of bakelite: towards a theory of invention’, in The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Social Study of Technology (ed. Bijker, W., Pinch, T. and Hughes, T.), Cambridge, 1987, 159–87 (especially 159–60, 176–81)Google Scholar. For the blurred artificial/natural boundary, see Daston, L., ‘The naturalised female intellect’, Science in Context (1992), 5, 209–35 (see 222–5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁸ Adams, G., ‘A catalogue of mathematical, philosophical, and optical instruments, as made and sold by George Adams, at Tycho Brahe's Head, in Fleet-Street, London’, in Micrographia illustra (by Adams, G.), London, 1746, 243–63 (see 258)Google Scholar; Warter, J., Southey's Common-place Book, 4 vols., London, 1849–1850, i, 435Google Scholar. See also the advertisement at the foot of an optician's trade card reproduced in Calvert, H. A., Scientific Trade Cards in the Science Museum Collection, London, 1971, no. 132.Google Scholar

³⁹ Nicholson, W., An Introduction to Natural Philosophy, 2 vols., London, ii, 323Google Scholar. Letter from Baker, Henry to Arderon, William of 6 04 1751Google Scholar: Arderon correspondence, 4 vols., National Art Library, Victoria and Albert Museum, London (Forster 47.c.11–14), ii, 77.

⁴⁰ Schofield, R. E., The Lunar Society of Birmingham, Oxford, 1963, 51, 105Google Scholar. Knight, , op. cit. (35)Google Scholar. Wilson, B., ‘Account of Dr Knight's method of making artificial loadstones’, Philosophical Transactions (1779), 69, 51–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴¹ For full details, see Fara, , op. cit. (9)Google Scholar. There is a partial account in de Morgan, A., ‘The Canton papers’, Athenaeum (1849), 5– 7, 162–4, 375.Google Scholar

⁴² Stone, , op. cit. (26), 307.Google Scholar

⁴³ Wilson, , op. cit. (40), 49–50, quotation from 49.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Golinski, J., ‘Utility and audience in eighteenth-century chemistry: case studies of William Cullen and Joseph Priestley’, BJHS (1988), 68, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁵ Schaffer, S., ‘The consuming flame: electrical showmen and Tory mystics in the world of goods’Google Scholar, in Brewer, and Porter, , op. cit. (4), 489–526Google Scholar; and Scharfer, , op. cit. (12).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Porter, R., ‘Before the fringe: “quackery” and the eighteenth-century medical market’, in Studies in the History of Alternative Medicine (ed. Cooter, R.), London, 1988, 1–27Google Scholar; Porter, R., Health for Sale: Quackery in England 1660–1850, Manchester, 1989Google Scholar; Porter, R., ‘The language of quackery in England, 1660–1800’, in The Social History of Language (ed. Burke, P. and Porter, R.), Cambridge, 1987, 73–103.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Knight, G., ‘An account of some magnetical experiments shewed before the Royal Society’, Philosophical Transactions (1744), 43, 161–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Knight, G., ‘A letter to the President, concerning the poles of magnets being variously placed’, Philosophical Transactions (1745), 43, 361–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Knight, G., ‘A collection of the magnetical experiments communicated to the Royal Society… in the years 1746 and 1747’, Philosophical Transactions (1747), 44, 656–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁸ Bennett, J. A., ‘Hooke's instruments for astronomy and navigation’ in Robert Hooke: New Studies (ed. Hunter, M. and Schaffer, S.), Suffolk, 1989, 21–32, especially 31–2.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Lukis, W. C., The Family Memoirs of the Rev William Stukeley, MD and the Antiquaries and Correspondence of William Stukeley, Roger and Samuel Gale, etc, 3 vols., Durham, 1882–1887, ii, 361–2.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Morton, A. Q., ‘Lectures on natural philosophy in London, 1750–1765: S. C. T. Demainbray (1710–1782) and the “Inattention” of his country men’, BJHS (1990), 23, 411–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵¹ Burr, T. B., The History of Tunbridge Wells, London, 1766, 145–6Google Scholar. Erasmus King was a popular lecturer in natural philosophy.

⁵² Adams, G., An Essay on Electricity, Explaining the Theory and Practice of that Useful Science; and the Mode of Applying it to Medical Purposes, London, 1787, 373–454Google Scholar; Adams, G., Lectures on Natural and Experimental Philosophy, Considered in its Present State of Improvement, 5 vols., London, 1794, iv, 435–70Google Scholar. Letter from Cavallo, to Lind, James of 10 07 1784Google Scholar: British Library Add. MSS. 22897, fols. 21–2; Cavallo, T., A Treatise on Magnetism, in Theory and Practice, with Original Experiments, 1st edn, London, 1787.Google Scholar

⁵³ Undated advertisement pasted into the British Library copy of Peat, T., A Short Account of a Course of Mechanical and Experimental Philosophy and Astronomy, Nottingham, 1744Google Scholar (shelf mark 8704.aa.10). Henry Moyse's newspaper advertisement of 26 February 1783 mentioning magnetic experiments is in the Lysons Collectanea, British Library (shelf mark c.103.k.11), 5 vols., iii, 177v.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Letter from Arden, to Baker, of 16 03 1750Google Scholar: Baker correspondence, 8 vols., John Rylands Library, Manchester, MS 19, iv, 255–6Google Scholar. See Schofield, , op. cit. (40), 31–2Google Scholar for a Birmingham advertisement mentioning artificial magnets.

⁵⁵ Millburn, J. R., ‘The London evening courses of Benjamin Martin and James Ferguson, eighteenth-century lecturers on experimental philosophy’, Annals of Science (1983), 40, 437–55, especially 453–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁶ Altick, R. D., The Shows of London, Cambridge, MA, 1978, 77–86Google Scholar. Porter, , ‘The language of quackery’, op. cit. (46).Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Unsourced copy of a poster reproduced in Bishop, G. D., ‘A History of the Teaching of Physics in England from 1650 to 1850’, Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1959, 370Google Scholar. See also Brown, A. S., ‘Gustavus Katterfelto: mason and magician’, Ars Quatuor Coronatorum (1956), 69, 136–8Google Scholar; Money, J., Experience and Identity, Manchester, 1977, 140–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and newspaper clippings in Sophia Banks' collection of broadsides, British Library (shelf mark L.R. 301.h.3). There is a series of different advertisements in The Norfolk Chronicle (4 12, 11 12, 18 12, 24 12 1784 and 1 01, 8 01 and 15 01 1785)Google Scholar, which Katterfelto probably repeated as he toured the provinces.

⁵⁸ Quotation from the Morning Post of 20 02 1778Google Scholar. This is one of several advertisements in the Collectanea, Lysons, op. cit. (53), iii, 157–73Google Scholar and items 240/1 and 446 in the Douce Additional MSS. at the Bodleian Library, Oxford. See also Porter, , Health for Sale, op. cit. (46)Google Scholar, for references, and Graham, J., A Sketch: Or, Short Description of Dr Graham's Medical Apparatus, & c. Erected about the Beginning of the Year 1780, in His House, on the Royal Terrace, Adelphi, London, London, 1780.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Croker, T. H., Experimental Magnetism, or, the Truth of Mr Mason's Discoveries in that Branch of Natural Philosophy, That There Can Be No Such Thing in Nature, as an Internal Central Loadstone, Proved and Ascertained, London, 1761Google Scholar. The instrument was invented by Abraham Mason, a settler in Barbados. See DNB; Paulson, R., Hogarth: His Life, Art and Times, 2 vols., New Haven and London, 1971, ii, 263Google Scholar; Hindle, B., The Pursuit of Science in Revolutionary America 1735–1789, Chapel Hill, 1956, 349–50Google Scholar; Stearns, R. P., Science in the British Colonies of America, Urbana, 1970, 362–3Google Scholar; Croker, , Williams, and Clark, , op. cit. (26)Google Scholar; and the MSS notes in Croker's own copy of Experimental Magnetism (British Library, press mark 956.e.33).

⁶⁰ Royal Society Journal Book (copy) (1760), 23, 903–5Google Scholar and ibid. (1761), 24, 83–4. Birch, Thomas's diary, British Library Add. MSS 4478C, 387Google Scholar. See also The Daily Advertiser of 27 11 1760Google Scholar (I am grateful to Alan Morton for this reference); Croker, , op. cit. (59), 8, 27, 39–40.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Kenrick, W., A Lecture on the Perpetual Motion, London, 1771Google Scholar. Lukis, , op. cit. (49), ii, 372Google Scholar. See Schaffer, S., ‘The show that never ends: displays of perpetual motion in the early eighteenth century’, BJHS (forthcoming).Google Scholar

⁶² For Newton's sketch of a magnetic perpetual-motion machine, see Westfall, R., Force in Newton's Physics, New York, 1971, 329–32Google Scholar. Hutton, C., Recreations in Mathematics and Natural Philosophy, 4 vols., London, 1803, ii, 102–6Google Scholar described and condemned magnetic perpetual motion. John Spence travelled round the country with a magnetic perpetual-motion machine which he claimed had continued for almost three years: see an undated poster (probably early nineteenth century) in the John Johnson Collection, Bodleian Library, Oxford, Scientific Instruments box 2.

⁶³ Fara, P., ‘An attractive therapy: animal magnetism in eighteenth-century England’, History of Science, in press.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Curry, P., Prophecy and Power, Cambridge, 1989Google Scholar; MacDonald, M., ‘Religion, social change, and psychological healing in England, 1600–1800’, Studies in Church History (1982), 19, 101–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clark, , op. cit. (3), 161–73Google Scholar. Letter from Baker, Henry to Blair, Archibald of 10 02 1749Google Scholar: Baker correspondence, op. cit. (54), iv, 67Google Scholar (part of an extensive correspondence on these subjects).

⁶⁵ Defoe, D., A System of Magick; Or, a History of the Black Art, London, 1727, 46–9, 60–1Google Scholar (quotations from 60): see Baine, R. M., Daniel Defoe and the Supernatural, Athens, GA, 1968, 64–72Google Scholar, and Tavor, E., Scepticism, Society and the Eighteenth-Century Novel, London, 1987, 7–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Pemberton, H., A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy, London, 1728, 12–13Google Scholar. David Hartley, in a passage appropriated by Samuel Coleridge, used the same observation to counter objections to the credibility of biblical miracles: see Hartley, D., Observations on Man, his Frame, his Duty, and his Expectations, 2 vols, in 1, Gainsville, 1966, 142–3Google Scholar, and Coleridge, S., Lectures 1795 on Politics and Religion (ed. Patton, L. and Mann, P.), London, 1971, 112, 157Google Scholar. Bishop Butler also referred to magnetic phenomena in this type of debate: see the quotation in Burns, R. M., The Great Debate on Miracles: From Joseph Glanvill to David Hume, London, 1981, 130.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Bryan, M., Lectures on Natural Philosophy: The Result of Many Years' Practical Experience of the Facts Elucidated, London, 1806, 143.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Darwin, E., The Poetical Works of Erasmus Darwin, Containing the Botanic Garden, in Two Parts; and the Temple of Nature, 3 vols., London, 1806, i, 90–3Google Scholar. Touching meant magnetizing a compass needle with a loadstone, but it also carried overtones of the healing powers associated with the king's touch, as well as erotic connotations which were heightened during the vogue for animal magnetism. Erasmus Darwin occasionally wrote poems with concealed messages to his second wife, Elizabeth Pole.

⁶⁸ Bazerman, C., ‘Forums of validation and forms of knowledge: the magical rhetoric of Otto von Guericke's sulfur globe’, Configurations (1993), 1, 201–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁹ Edgeworth, R. L., Memoirs of Richard Lovell Edgeworth Esq Begun by Himself, and Concluded by his Daughter, Maria Edgeworth, London, 1844, 74–6Google Scholar. For conjurors, see Frost, T., The Lives of the Conjurors, London, 1876, 112–56Google Scholar and for London entertainments, see Altick, , op. cit. (56), 34–127Google Scholar. Schofield, , op. cit. (40), 45Google Scholar. King-Hele, D., The Essential Writings of Erasmus Darwin, London, 1968, 130.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Breslaw, P., Breslaw's Last Legacy; or, the Magical Companion: Containing all that is Curious, Pleasing, Entertaining, and Comical; Selected from the Most Celebrated Masters of Deception; as well as with Slight of Hand, as with Mathematical Inventions, London, 1784, 35–6.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Golinski, , op. cit. (8), 93–130, quotation from 122.Google Scholar

⁷² Regnault, N., Philosophical Conversations: Or, a New System of Physics, By Way of Dialogue (tr. Dale, T.), 2 vols., London, 1734, i, 213Google Scholar. The Universal Magazine (1763), 33, 250–4 (plate at 142–3).Google Scholar

⁷³ Rousseau, J.-J., Emile (tr. Foxley, B.), London, 1974, 135–8Google Scholar. Torlais, J., Un Physicien au siècle des lumières, Paris, 1954, 77–8Google Scholar. Ozanam, J., Recreations Mathematical and Physical; Laying Down, and Solving Many Profitable and Delightful Problems of Arithmetick, Geometry, Opticks, Gnomonicks, Cosmography, Mechanics, Physics, and Pyrotechnology, London, 1708, 458.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Breslaw, , op. cit. (70), 33–7Google Scholar, also reproduced in Pinetti, G., The Conjurer's Repository, London, 1793, 34–5.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Walker, A., A System of Familiar Philosophy: In Twelve Lectures; Being the Course Usually Read by Mr A Walker, London, 1802, 73–4.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Hooper, W., Rational Recreations, 4 vols., London, 1774, iii, 113–246Google Scholar. There were four editions in twenty years.

⁷⁷ Lister, , op. cit. (27), 27.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Baldwin, M. R., ‘Magnetism and the anti-Copernican polemic’, Journal for the History of Astronomy (1985), 16, 155–74 (see 161–5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁹ Kircher, A., Magnes sive de arte magnetica, Rome, 1641, 344Google Scholar. For some eighteenth-century discussions of magnetic communication, see Bailey, N., The Universal Etymological English Dictionary, London, 1731Google Scholar, entry on loadstone; Addison, J., The Guardian (1714), 2, 186–7Google Scholar; Notes and Queries (1852), 6, 204–5.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Smith, O., The Politics of Language 1791–1819, Oxford, 1984Google Scholar. Barker-Benfield, , op. cit. (7)Google Scholar. Schiach, M., Discourse on Popular Culture, Cambridge, 1989, 1–34Google Scholar. Daniels, S., Fields of Vision: Landscape Imagery and National Identity in England and the United States, Cambridge, 1993, 43–79.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Hooper, , op. cit. (76), i, pp. iii–viii (quotation from p. vi)Google Scholar; Gale, J., Gale's Cabinet of Knowledge; Or Miscellaneous Recreations, London, 1797, pp. iii–vi (magnetic entertainments are on pp. 179–88).Google Scholar

⁸² Monthly Review (1775), 52, 19–29Google Scholar; for Bewley, see Nangle, B. C., The Monthly Review First Series 1749–89, Oxford, 1934, 4–5Google Scholar. Edgeworth, M. and Edgeworth, R., A Practical Education, London, 1798, 26–8.Google Scholar

⁸³ The European Magazine, and London Review (1792), 21, 411–13Google Scholar. Burney, F., Diary and Letters of Madame d'Arblay (1778–1840) (ed. Barrett, C.), 6 vols., London, 1904–1905, ii, 180–1.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Walker, , op. cit. (75), 73–4Google Scholar; Breslaw, , op. cit. (70), 37Google Scholar; Pinetti, , op. cit. (74), 35Google Scholar; The British Critic (1800), 15, 638–42.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Schuster, J. and Watchirs, G., ‘Natural philosophy, experiment and discourse: beyond the Kuhn/Bachelard problematic’, in Experimental Inquiries (ed. Le Grand, H.), Dordrecht, 1990, 1–47.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Meyers, G., ‘Science for women and children: the dialogue of popular science in the nineteenth century’Google Scholar, in Christie, and Shuttleworth, , op. cit. (20), 171–200.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Walker, R., A Treatise on Magnetism, With a Description and Explanation of a Meridional and Azimuth Compass, For Ascertaining the Quantity of Variation, Without Any Calculation Whatever, at Any time of the Day, London, 1794, 90Google Scholar; The British Critic (1795), 5, 487–90, quotation from 489.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Useful surveys include: Aarsleff, H., From Locke to Saussure, London, 1982Google Scholar; Howell, W. S., Eighteenth-Century British Logic and Rhetoric, Princeton, 1971, 439–61Google Scholar; Land, S., The Philosophy of Language in Britain: Major Theories from Hobbes to Thomas Reid, New York, 1986.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Encyclopedia Britannica, 1801, i, 500–5Google Scholar, quotation from 501 (on dynamics).

⁹⁰ Leonardus, C., The Mirror of Stones: In Which the Nature, Generation, Properties, Virtues and Various Species of More than 200 Different Jewels, Precious and Rare Stones, are Distinctly Described, London, 1750, preface and 206–10Google Scholar; Cohausen, J. H., Hermippus redivivus: Or, the Sage's Triumph Over Old Age and the Grave, 1744, preface.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Werenfels, S., A Dissertation upon Superstition in Natural Things, London, 1748Google Scholar. Cavallo, , Magnetism, op. cit. (52), 101–3, quotation from 102.Google Scholar