Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:57:27.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Transporting thought’: cultures of balloon flight in Britain, 1784–1785

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2017

CAITLÍN RÓISÍN DOHERTY
CAITLÍN RÓISÍN DOHERTY*
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, UK. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The balloon has long drifted through popular discourse as a symbol of an Enlightenment attitude towards discovery and a Romanticized image of rationality. This article uses two accounts of early British balloon voyages, both published in 1786, and through them attempts to understand the wide range of practices – literary, social, chemical and adventurous – employed by early balloonists in Britain. I argue that the two series of flights recorded by John Jeffries and Vincenzo Lunardi can be read to show two different philosophical ideas of and aspirations for ballooning, each of which is tied to a different British location, and established a different paradigm for the public reception of flight experiments in later years.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 229 - 247
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brandon Brame Fortune with Warner, Deborah J., Franklin & His Friends: Portraying the Man of Science in Eighteenth-Century America, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999, p. 120 Google Scholar.

2 John Jeffries, A Narrative of the Two Aerial Voyages of Doctor Jeffries with Mons. Blanchard; with Meteorological Observations and Remarks. The First Voyage, on the Thirteenth of November, 1784, from London into Kent. The Second, on the Seventh of 27 January, 1785, from England into France, presented to the Royal Society, April 14, 1785; and read before them, January 1786, London: Printed for the Author, 1786.

3 As an example of the risks involved it should be noted that French balloonist Pilatre de Rozier was the first person to die in a ballooning accident when he attempted to cross from France to England six months later.

4 For a full discussion of the types of consumer object that balloons inspired see Lynn, Michael, ‘Consumerism and the rise of balloons in Europe at the end of the eighteenth century’, Science in Context (2008) 21(1), pp. 73–98 Google Scholar.

5 Lunardi, Vincenzo, An Account of Five Aerial Voyages in Scotland in a Series of Letters to his Guardian, Chevalier Gerardo Compagni, written under the Impression of the Various Events that affected the Undertaking, London: printed by John Bell, 1786 Google Scholar.

6 Samuel Richardson's Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded (1740) and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) are perhaps the most famous examples of the period's vogue for epistolary novels. A useful survey can be found in Black, Frank Gees, The Epistolary Novel in the Late Eighteenth Century: A Descriptive and Bibliographic Study, Eugene: University of Oregon Press, 1940 Google Scholar.

7 For more on the links between literary criticisms and eighteenth-century British bourgeois society see Jürgen Habermas's classic study The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (tr. Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence), Cambridge: Polity, 1989 Google Scholar.

8 Quilley, Geoff, ‘Introduction: mapping the art of travel and exploration’, Journal of Historical Geography (2014) 43, pp. 2–8 Google Scholar.

9 Holmes, Richard, ‘Chapter 8: vertical explorations’ in Holmes, Falling Upwards: How We Took to the Air, London: William Collins, 2013, pp. 193–225 Google Scholar.

10 This division of technical and scientific knowledge has a contemporary source of authority, which influenced experimental philosophy (particularly at the Royal Society) at the time. Ephraim Chambers's diagrammatic outline of the ‘tree of knowledge’, published in 1728, describes knowledge as belonging to one of two branches: the natural and scientific, or the artificial and technical. Jeffries's intention to investigate the upper atmosphere via balloon aligns him with the pursuit of scientific knowledge, which is either ‘Sensible’ or ‘Rational’, a distinction Jeffries navigates in his sensory descriptions of the flight, and his outlook on the world below. Blanchard, according to this authoritative contemporary diagram of knowledge production, belongs to the artificial and technical realms of applied arts. From their inception, Jeffries and Blanchard's flights conformed to the expectations of a Royal Society audience in the way that they managed the creation and presentation of new discoveries relating to human flight.

11 Jeffries, op. cit. (2), p. 28.

12 Jeffries, op. cit. (2), p. 11.

13 Thomas, Nicholas, ‘Licensed curiosity: Cook's Pacific voyages’, in Elsner, John and Cardinal, Roger (eds.), The Cultures of Collecting , London: Reaktion Books, 1994, pp. 116–136, 123Google Scholar.

14 Jeffries, op. cit. (2), p. 13.

15 Sorenson, Richarrd, ‘The ship as a scientific instrument in the eighteenth century’, Osiris (1996) 11, pp. 221–236 Google Scholar.

16 Michael Bravo, ‘Precision and curiosity in scientific travel: James Remnell and the orientalist geography of the new imperial age (1760–1830)’, in Jaś Elsner and Joan Pau Rubiés, eds., Voyages and Visions: Towards a Cultural History of Travel, pp. 162–183, 165.

17 In this manner, Jeffries portrait is very similar to the 1772 portrait by Benjamin West of Joseph Banks, where he is surrounded by specimens and objects from his voyage on the Endeavour.

18 Withers, Charles W.J., Placing the Enlightenment: Thinking Geographically about the Age of Reason, London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, p. 97 Google Scholar.

19 Sorrenson, op. cit. (15), p. 222.

20 For the full version of Cook's Endeavour journal see the 1893 edition, Captain Cook's journal during his first voyage round the world made in H.M. bark ‘Endeavour’, 1768–71: a literal transcription of the original Mss/with notes and introduction, ed. Wharton, Captain W.J.L.., London: E. Stock, 1893 Google Scholar.

21 Hawkesworth, John, An Account of the Voyages Undertaken by the Order of His Present Majesty for Making Discoveries in the Southern Hemisphere, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014 (first published 1773), p. xvGoogle Scholar.

22 Quilley, op. cit. (8), p. 4.

23 Jeffries, op. cit. (2), pp. 19–20, my emphasis.

24 ‘Lunardi &c’, Morning Post and Daily Advertiser, London, Monday 12 December 1785.

25 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 1.

26 Cavallo, Tiberius, The History and Practice of Aerostation, London: Printed for the Author, 1785, p. 164 Google Scholar.

27 Alexander Law, ‘Introduction’, in Lunardi, Vincenzo, An Account of Five Aerial Voyages in Scotland (facsimile) (ed. Law, Alexander) (Edinburgh: Friends of Edinburgh University Library, 1976)Google Scholar, n.p. Lunardi's scientific adviser for his British flights was Dr George Fordyce, a member of the dissenting community of chemists whose base was in Edinburgh and whose work was the practical foundation for balloon design.

28 For a full account of Scott's life and his education see Brian Dalgety Bonnyman, ‘Agricultural improvement in the Scottish Enlightenment: the third Duke of Buccleuch, William Keir and the Buccleuch estates 1751–1812’, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2004.

29 Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (ed. Sen, Amartya, based on the 1790 (6th) edn), London: Penguin, 2009, pp. 13–14 Google Scholar.

30 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 17.

31 Shapin, Steven, ‘The image of the man of science’, in Porter, Roy, ed., The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 4: Eighteenth Century Science, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 159–183, 166Google Scholar.

32 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 29.

33 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 66.

34 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 29.

35 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 36.

36 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 36.

37 Darnton, Robert, Mesmerism and the End of the Enlightenment in France, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 59.

39 Anonymous, 1785, unpaginated.

40 Bainbridge, Simon, ‘Romantic writers and mountaineering’, Romanticism (2012) 18(1), pp. 3–4 Google Scholar.

41 Jonsson, Fredrik Albritton, Enlightenment's Frontier: The Scottish Highlands and the Origins of Environmentalism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013, p. 50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 52.

43 For a thorough history of the club see David Stevenson, The Beggar's Benison: Sex Clubs of Enlightenment Scotland, 2013, eBook, accessed 17 August 2016.

44 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 52.

45 Lunardi, op. cit. (5), p. 53.

46 Paine, Thomas, Rights of Man (ed. Collins, Henry), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1969, p. 97 Google Scholar.