Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:24:26.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science, medicine and new imperial histories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Rohan Deb Roy
Rohan Deb Roy
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay review
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 45 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Transnational History of Science , September 2012 , pp. 443 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wilson, Kathleen (ed.), A New Imperial History: Culture, Identity and Modernity in Britain and the Empire, 1660–1840, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004Google Scholar; Howe, Stephen (ed.), The New Imperial Histories Reader, London: Routledge, 2008Google Scholar; Thompson, James, ‘Modern Britain and new imperial history’, History Compass (2007) 5, pp. 455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ballantyne, Tony, ‘The changing shape of the modern British Empire and its historiography’, Historical Journal (2010) 53, pp. 429–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sartori, Andrew, ‘The British Empire and its liberal mission’, Journal of Modern History (2006) 78, pp. 623–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Wilson, Kathleen, ‘Old imperialisms and new imperial histories: rethinking the history of the present’, Radical History Review (2006) 95, pp. 211–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 214.

3 Ann Laura Stoler and Fredrick Cooper, ‘Between metropole and colony: rethinking a research agenda’, in Ann Laura Stoler and Fredrick Cooper (eds.), Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1997, pp. 1–40; Catherine Hall, ‘Thinking the postcolonial, thinking the empire’, in idem (ed.), Cultures of Empire: Colonizers in Britain and the Empire in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries: A Reader, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000, pp. 9–27; Wilson, Kathleen, The Island Race: Englishness, Empire and Gender in the Eighteenth Century, London: Routledge, 2003Google Scholar.

4 See especially Ballantyne, Tony, Orientalism and Race: Aryanism in the British Empire, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001Google Scholar; Bayly, C.A., The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2004Google Scholar.

5 For the links between liberalism and empire see, for instance, Mehta, Uday Singh, Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1999Google Scholar; Pitts, Jennifer, A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the relationships between empire and gender see Ghosh, Durba, Sex and the Family in Colonial India: The Making of Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Levine, Philippa (ed.), Gender and Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004Google Scholar; Stoler, Ann Laura, Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002Google Scholar.

6 Schaffer, Simon et al. (eds.), The Brokered World: Go-Between and Global Intelligence, 1770–1820, Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications, 2009Google Scholar; Raj, Kapil, Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and Construction of Knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650–1900, Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Arnold, David, The Tropics and the Travelling Gaze: India, Landscape and Science, 1800–1856, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2006Google Scholar; Safier, Neil, Measuring the New World: Enlightenment Science and South America, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schiebinger, Londa, Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004Google Scholar; Sivasundaram, Sujit, Nature and the Godly Empire: Science and the Evangelical Mission in the Pacific, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005Google Scholar; Drayton, Richard, Nature's Government: Science, Imperial Britain and the ‘Improvement’ of the World, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000Google Scholar; Edmund, Rod, Leprosy and Empire: A Medical and Cultural History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007Google Scholar; Cook, Harold J., Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine and Science in the Dutch Golden Age, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 For the phrase ‘multi-sited histories’ see Warwick Anderson, ‘Postcolonial histories of medicine’, in Frank Huisman and John Harley Warner (eds.), Locating Medical History: The Stories and Their Meanings, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004, 287.

8 Pratt, Mary Louise, Imperial Eyes: Studies in Travel Writing and Transculturation, London: Routledge, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Arnold, David, Colonizing the Body: State Medicine and Epidemic Disease in Nineteenth-Century India, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1993Google Scholar; Vaughan, Megan, Curing Their Ills: Colonial Power and African Illness, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991Google Scholar; Anderson, Warwick, Colonial Pathologies: American Tropical Medicine, Race, and Hygiene in the Philippines, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Prakash, Gyan, Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999Google Scholar.

9 Pande, Ishita, Medicine, Race and Liberalism in British Bengal: Symptoms of Empire, London and New York: Routledge, 2010Google Scholar.

10 Hodges, Sarah, ‘The global menace’, Social History of Medicine, forthcoming; Shruti Kapila, ‘The enchantment of science in India’, Isis (2010) 101, pp. 120–132Google Scholar; Sivasundaram, Sujit, ‘Sciences and the global: on methods, questions and theory’, Isis (2010) 101, pp. 146–158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. See also Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Empire, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2000, pp. 150–156Google Scholar.

11 Lisa Lowe, ‘The intimacy of four continents’, in Ann Laura Stoler (ed.), Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Intimacy in North American History, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006, pp. 191–212; Sinha, Mrinalini, Specters of Mother India: The Global Restructuring of an Empire, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006, pp. 23–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 266.

12 Richard Drayton, ‘Maritime networks and the making of knowledge’, in David Cannadine (ed.), Empire, the Sea and Global History: Britain's Maritime World, c.1763–c.1840, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 72–82.

13 Trentmann, Frank, ‘Materiality in the future of history: things, practices and politics’, Journal of British Studies (2009) 48, pp. 283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 297–300; Kirsch, Scott and Mitchell, Don, ‘The nature of things: dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism’, Antipode (2004) 36, pp. 687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 688; Pickering, Andrew, ‘The mangle of practice: agency and emergence in the sociology of science’, American Journal of Sociology (1993) 99, pp. 559–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 559–576.

14 Wim van Binsbergen, ‘Things, agency, and identities: introduction’, in Wim van Binsbergen and Peter Geschiere (eds.), Commodification: Things, Agency and Identities: The Social Life of Things Revisited, Berlin, Münster, Vienna and London: LIT Verlag, 2005, pp. 9–51; Thomas, Nicholas, Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture and Colonialism in the Pacific, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991Google Scholar. For her explication of ‘materio-semiotic actors’ see Donna Haraway, ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, in Mario Biagioli (ed.), The Science Studies Reader, London: Routledge, 1999, pp. 172–188.

15 Stoler and Cooper, ‘Between metropole and colony’, op. cit. (3).

16 See especially Stoler, Ann Laura, Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault's History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 1995Google Scholar; McClintock, Anne, Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Conquest, London: Routledge, 1995Google Scholar; Burke, Timothy, Lifebuoy Men, Lux Women: Commodification, Consumption and Cleanliness in Modern Zimbabwe, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996Google Scholar.

17 On the theme of locality in science studies see Chambers, David Wade and Gillespie, Richard, ‘Locality in the history of science: colonial science, technoscience and indigenous knowledge’, Osiris (2000) 15, pp. 221–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar; For a recent summary see Raj, Kapil, ‘Introduction: circulation and locality in early modern science’, BJHS (2010) 43, pp. 513–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the politics of the vernacular in colonial medicine see Mukharji, Projit Bihari, Nationalizing the Body: The Medical Market, Print and Daktari Medicine, London and New York: Anthem Press, 2009Google Scholar.

18 For an analysis of recalcitrant ‘tactics’ of consumption see de Certeau, Michel, The Practice of Everyday Life, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1984Google Scholar.