Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T22:32:52.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pairing in Mendel's Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Margaret Campbell
Margaret Campbell
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, P.O. Box 1144, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2500.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Note
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , November 1985 , pp. 337 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I should like to express my thanks to Dr. D. J. Campbell, Department of Biology, for assisting with critical comments during the draft stage.

1 Olby, R. C., ‘Mendel No Mendelian,’ History of Science, xvii, 1979, pp. 53–72, p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Ibid., p. 62.

3 Heimans, J., ‘Ein Notizblatt aus dem Nachlass Gregor Mendels mit Analysen eines seiner Kreuzungsversuche.’ Folia Mendeliana, iv, 1968, pp. 5–36Google Scholar; ‘Mendel's Ideas on the Nature of Hereditary Characters. The Explanation of Fragmentary Records of Mendel's Hybridizing Experiments,’ Folia Mendeliana, vi, 1971, pp. 91–98.Google Scholar

4 Mendel, G., ‘Experiments on Plant Hybrids,’ in The Origin of Genetics, (ed. Stern, C. and Sherwood, E.), San Francisco and London, 1966, pp. 1–48, p. 33.Google Scholar

5 Ibid. p. 35.

6 Ibid.

7 Ibid.

8 Ibid.

9 Ibid.

10 Ibid. (italics inserted)

11 Ibid.

12 Olby, , Op. Cit., (1), p. 60.Google Scholar

13 Ibid.

14 Campbell, M., ‘The Concepts of Dormancy, Latency and Dominance in Nineteenth Century Biology,’ Journal of the History of Biology, 16, 1983, pp. 409–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

15 Olby, , Op. Cit., (1), p. 66.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., p. 61.

17 Ibid.

18 See Mendel, , Op. Cit., (4), p. 30.Google Scholar

19 Olby, , Op. Cit., (1), p. 61.Google Scholar

20 Ibid.

21 Ibid., p. 60.

22 Naegeli, C., ‘Ueber die abgeleiteten Pflanzenbastarde,” Vorgetragen den 13, Januar 1866, in Botanische Mittheilungen, Munchen, 1866, Vol. II, pp. 237–291, p. 242.Google Scholar

23 Olby quotes Heimans, , Op. Cit., (1) p. 62.Google Scholar

24 Naegeli, , Op. Cit., p. 244.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., p. 245.

26 Mendel, , Op. Cit., (4), p. 43.Google Scholar

27 Brannigan, A., The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries, Cambridge, 1981, Ch. 6.Google Scholar