No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2019
What are cells? How are they related to each other and to the organism as a whole? These questions have exercised biology since Schleiden and Schwann (1838–1839) first proposed cells as the key units of structure and function of all living things. But how do we try to understand them? Through new technologies like the achromatic microscope and the electron microscope. But just as importantly, through the metaphors our culture has made available to biologists in different periods and places. These two new volumes provide interesting history and philosophy of the development of cell biology. Reynolds surveys the field's changing conceptual structure by examining the varied panoply of changing metaphors used to conceptualize and explain cells – from cells as empty boxes, as building blocks, to individual organisms, to chemical factories, and through many succeeding metaphors up to one with great currency today: cells as social creatures in communication with others in their community. There is some of this approach in the Visions edited collection as well. But this collection also includes rich material on the technologies used to visualize cells and their dialectical relationship with the epistemology of the emerging distinct discipline of cell biology. This volume centres on, but is not limited to, ‘reflections inspired by [E.V.] Cowdry's [1924 volume] General Cytology’; it benefits from a conference on the Cowdry volume as well as a 2011 Marine Biological Lab/Arizona State University workshop on the history of cell biology.
1 Geison, Gerald, ‘The protoplasmic theory of life and the vitalist–mechanist debate’, Isis (1969) 60, pp. 273–292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
2 Rasmussen, Nicolas, Picture Control, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997Google Scholar; Rothman, Stephen, Lessons from the Living Cell, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002Google Scholar.
3 Pollock, Gerald, Cells, Gels and the Engines of Life: A New, Unifying Approach to Cell Function, Seattle: Ebner and Sons, 2001Google Scholar; Hillman, Harold, ‘Biochemical cytology: has it advanced in the last 35 years?’, The Biologist (1983) 65, pp. 1–16Google Scholar; Hillman, , ‘Some microscopic considerations about cell structure: light versus electron microscopy’, Microscopy (1991) 36, pp. 557–576Google Scholar; Hillman, , The Case for New Paradigms in Cell Biology and in Neurobiology, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1991Google Scholar; Hillman, , Evidence-Based Cell Biology, Maastricht: Shaker Publications, 2008Google Scholar; Hillman, Harold and Sartory, Peter, The Living Cell: A Re-examination of Its Fine Structure, Chichester: Packard, 1980Google Scholar.
4 Bechtel, William, Discovering Cell Mechanisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006Google Scholar.
5 DuNoüy, Pierre LeComte, ‘Tissue culture in vitro’ (1931), in DuNoüy, LeComte, Between Knowing and Believing (Paris: Hermann, 1966), pp. 21–38Google Scholar; DuNoüy, LeComte, Biological Time, New York: Macmillan, 1937Google Scholar; Strick, James, ‘Adrianus Pijper and the debate over bacterial flagella, 1946–1956’, Isis (1996) 87, pp. 274–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Strick, , Wilhelm Reich, Biologist, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Ronald Canti, ‘Cultivation of living tissue, part 3’ (1933), at www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIhaaNeFgdE&t=48s, for example. For more on this see Stramer, Brian M. and Dunn, Graham A., ‘Cells on film: the past and future of cinemicroscopy’, Journal of Cell Science (2015) 128, pp. 9–13, doi:10.1242/jcs.165019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. On the Lewis films see Landecker, Hannah, ‘The Lewis films: tissue culture and “living anatomy”, 1919–1940’, in Maienschein, Jane and Glitz, Marie (eds.), History of the Carnegie Institute Laboratory of Embryology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 117–144Google Scholar; Landecker, , ‘Creeping, drinking, dying: the cinematic portal and the microscopic world of the twentieth-century cell’, Science in Context (2011) 24, pp. 381–416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Adrianus Pijper's films are at the American Society for Microbiology archives at University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Catonsville, MD.
7 See, e.g., ‘Forbidden Fertilization’, at www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATQrxZSLia4.
8 Gooday, Graeme, ‘Instrumentation and interpretation’, in Lightman, Bernard (ed.), Victorian Science in Context, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1997, pp. 409–437Google Scholar.
9 Coen, Deborah R., Vienna in the Age of Uncertainty: Science, Liberalism and Private Life, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, p. 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Landecker, Hannah, Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Schloegel, Judy Johns and Schmidgen, Henning, ‘General physiology, experimental psychology, and evolutionism: unicellular organisms as objects of psychophysiological research, 1877–1918’, Isis (2002) 93, pp. 614–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Strick, Wilhelm Reich, op. cit. (5), pp. 26–27, 60–61.
13 Geison, Gerald, Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978Google Scholar.
14 Reich, Wilhelm, The Mass Psychology of Fascism, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1969Google Scholar; first published 1946, esp. Chapters 11–13.
15 See e.g. E.F. Keller, ‘One woman and her theory’, New Scientist, 3 July 1986, pp. 46–50, esp. the section ‘A job for a woman’. Also Strick, James, ‘Exobiology at NASA: incubator for the Gaia and serial endosymbiosis theories’, in Clarke, Bruce (ed.), Earth, Life, and System: Evolution and Ecology on a Gaian Planet, New York: Fordham University Press, 2015, pp. 80–104, esp. 95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar.