Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T06:32:48.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Jodhpur and the aeroplane: aviation and diplomacy in an Indian state 1924–1952

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2023

Aashique Ahmed Iqbal*
Affiliation:
Faculty of History, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Krea University, India

Abstract

This paper is a study of the intersection between aviation and diplomacy in the semi-autonomous Indian state of Jodhpur in the final decades of British colonial rule in India. Jodhpur's Maharaja Umaid Singh established a major international aerodrome, patronized one of India's first flying clubs and collaborated with British authorities to make aviation laws for the Indian states. He would also serve in the Royal Air Force during the war and placed Jodhpur state's aviation resources at the disposal of the king-emperor. This paper argues that Jodhpur was able to leverage its aviation resources to wield substantial influence both within and beyond the British Empire through both war and peace. An analysis of Jodhpur's engagement with aviation diplomacy is also revealing of some of the limitations as well as possibilities for the deployment of science diplomacy frameworks, especially in non-Western contexts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 The remainder of this paragraph draws from The Report on the Administration of the Jodhpur State for the year 1938–39, Jodhpur: Jodhpur Government Press, 1941, p. 148.

2 For a discussion of India's substitution of science with technology see Itty Abraham, The Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb: Science, Secrecy and the Postcolonial State, New Delhi: Zed Books, 1998.

3 David Edgerton, ‘“The supremacy of Uruguay”: thinking with the periphery as method’, keynote lecture delivered at the Fractured Skies: Aviation and the Global South Workshop, 29 June 2022.

4 The total number of Indian states remains contested since historians do not agree on the precise definition of what constitutes a princely state. Copland, Ian, The Princes of India in the Endgame of Empire 1917–1947, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Ramusack, Barbara, The Indian Princes and Their States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Bhagwan, Manu, Sovereign Spheres: Princes, Education and Empire in Colonial India, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 4Google Scholar.

7 I borrow the term ‘fragmented sovereignty’ from Eric Beverly, who used it to describe the complicated nature of shared sovereignty in another princely state, Hyderabad. Beverly, Eric Lewis, Hyderabad, British India and the World: Muslim Networks and Minor Sovereignty, c.1850–1950, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Turekian, Vaughan C., Mackindoe, Sarah, Copeland, Daryl, Davis, Lloyd S., Patman, Robert G. and Pozza, Maria, ‘The emergence of science diplomacy’, in Davis, Lloyd S. and Patman, Robert G. (eds.), Science Diplomacy: New Day or False Dawn, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2014, pp. 324Google Scholar.

9 Jacobsen, Lif Lund and Olšáková, Doubravka, ‘Diplomats in science diplomacy: promoting scientific and technological collaboration in international relations’, Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte (2020) 43(4), pp. 465–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

10 See, for instance, Arnold, David, Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Arnold, , Everyday Technology: Machines and the Making of India's Modernity, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sukumar, Arun Mohan, Midnight's Machines: A Political History of Technology in India, Gurgaon: Viking, 2019Google Scholar; Phalkey, Jahnavi and Lam, Tong, ‘Science of giants: China and India in the twentieth century’, BJHS Themes (2016) 1, pp. 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kumar, Deepak, Science and the Raj: A Study of British India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Phalkey., Jahnavi Atomic State: Big Science in Twentieth-Century India, Ranikhet: Permanent Black, 2013Google Scholar: Macleod, Roy and Kumar, Deepak, Technology and the Raj: Western Technology and Technical Transfers to India 1700–1947, New Delhi: Sage, 1995Google Scholar; Haines, Dan, Rivers Divided: Indus Basin Waters in the Making of India and Pakistan, Gurgaon: Viking, 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Haines, , Building the Empire, Building the Nation: Development, Legitimacy and Hydro-politics in Sind, 1919–1969, Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2003Google Scholar.

11 Prakash, Gyan, Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 168Google Scholar.

12 See, for instance, Robin Jeffrey, People, Princes, and Paramount Power: Society and Politics in the Indian Princely States, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1978; Ian Copland, The British Raj and the Indian Princes, Bombay: Orient Longman, 1982; Barbara Ramusack, The Princes of India in the Twilight of Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. For an exception to this see Jahnavi Phalkey, ‘Flights of freedom: German emigres, aeronautics and self-reliance in India’, in Srinath Raghavan and Nandini Sundar (eds.), A Functioning Anarchy: Essays for Ramachandra Guha, New Delhi: Allen Lane, 2021, pp. 251–270.

13 For exceptions to this trend see Aparajith Ramnath, ‘International networks and aircraft manufacture in late-colonial India: Hindustan Aircraft Limited, 1940–47’, Working Papers 205, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode; Priya Mirza, ‘Lessons from India's long journey to gaining the right to fly’, Caravan Magazine, 30 April 2021.

14 Priya Mirza, ‘“Sovereignty of the air”: the Indian princely states, the British empire and carving out of air-space (1911–1933)’, History and Technology (2022) 38(1), pp. 62–83, 63.

15 Peter Vacher, History of the Jodhpur Flying Club, Ontario: Griffin Media, 2008; P. Anuradha Reddy, Aviation in the Hyderabad Dominions, Secunderabad: Avi-Oil, 2001.

16 David Edgerton, England and the Aeroplane: Militarism, Modernity and Machines, London: Penguin, 2013; Uri Bialer, The Shadow of the Bomber, London: Royal Historical Society, 1980.

17 Ramusack, op. cit. (5), p. 106.

18 ‘A Lane Farman biplane for a maharajah’, Flight Magazine, 17 December 1910.

19 Mirza, op. cit. (13), p. 82.

20 Proceedings of the Chamber of Princes, 1931, Mehrangarh Museum Archive, Mehrangarh (subsequently MMA), Mahakhma Khas (subsequently M-KHAS), Aviation No 23 P1 FN-C-9 BN-3 1929-32.

21 Resolution dated 8 August 1932, MMA, M-KHAS Aviation No 23 P1 FN-C-9 BN-3 1929–32.

22 Rima Hooja, A History of Rajasthan, New Delhi: Rupa & Co, 2006, p. 373.

23 Nirmala M. Upadhyay, The Administration of Jodhpur State, 1800–1947 A.D., Jodhpur: International Publishers, 1973, p. 63.

24 Upadhyay, op. cit. (23), p. 64.

25 Dhananjay Singh, The House of Marwar, New Delhi: Roli Books, 1994, p. 173.

26 Janaki Nair, Mysore Modern: Rethinking the Region under Princely Rule, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011, p. 218.

27 Sahdev Singh Kheeche, Economic Reforms of Maharaja Umaid Singh's Reign, Jodhpur: Maharaja Mana Singh Pustak Prakash Research Centre, 2004, p. 29.

28 Kheeeche, op. cit. (27), p. x (Introduction).

29 Dhanajay Singh, op. cit. (25), p. 151.

30 Kheeche, op. cit. (27), p. 19.

31 Anvar Ali Khan, ‘The real Zubeida’, Rediff.com, January 2001, at www.rediff.com/movies/2001/jan/17zub.htm (accessed 17 July 2016).

32 Kheeche, op. cit. (27), p. 93.

33 Kheeche, op. cit. (27), p. 19.

34 Willie Hiatt, The Rarified Air of the Modern: Airplanes and Technological Modernity in the Andes, New York: Oxford University Press, 2016 (ebook).

35 Air mail postal notice, MMA, M-KHAS AVIATION-NO-11 P-1 FN-C-3 B-NO-02-YEAR-1929-39.

36 ‘Indian air mails’, Flight Magazine, 8 December 1932.

37 ‘The log of the Astraea’, Flight Magazine, 16 November 1933.

38 The Report on the Administration of the Jodhpur State for the year 1938–39, op. cit. (1), p. 150.

39 Office order, 1 March 1929, MMA, M-KHAS AVIATION NO-1 P-1 FN-C-1 B-NO-01-YEAR-1928-31.

40 Rajputana States Residency to Col. Windham, 9 October 1928, MMA, M-KHAS AVIATION NO-1 P-1 FN-C-1 B-NO-01-YEAR-1928-31.

41 Finance member, State Council, to member-in-waiting, State Council, 26 August 1931, MMA, Household Records, File No. 2.

42 Vacher, op. cit. (15), p. 15.

43 Report on the progress of civil aviation for the year 1938, MMA, M-KHAS AVIATION-NO-31 P-1 FN-C-18 B-NO-04-YEAR-1937-42.

44 Superintending engineer, Public Works Department, Jodhpur, to judicial member, State Council, Jodhpur, 24 September 1931, MMA, M-KHAS AVIATION-NO-23 P-1 FN-C-9 B-NO-03-YEAR-1929-32.

45 Copland, op. cit. (4), p. 80.

46 Superintending engineer, Public Works Department, Jodhpur, to judicial member, State Council, Jodhpur, op. cit. (44).

47 General principles for flying in Jodhpur, National Archives of India, New Delhi Foreign & Political-Reforms Branch-72 (21)-R/1931.

48 Secretary to the resident to chief secretary of Mysore State, 22 June 1940, Karnataka State Archive, Bangalore, General and Revenue Secretariat File 26.

49 For a detailed discussion of aviation in Hyderabad see Reddy, op. cit. (15).

50 The ‘martial-races theory’ was a pseudoscientific discourse constructed by the British to justify racial heirarchies and colonial recruiting practices. For a detailed critique of the martial races theory see Gajendra Singh, The Testimonies of Indian Soldiers and the Two World Wars: Between Self and Sepoy, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.

51 Singh, op. cit. (50), p. 148.

52 Their Highnesses of Bhopal and Jodhpur, report on Indian Air Force, MMA, Household Record No. 6.

53 Vacher, op. cit. (15), p. 118; Upadhyay, op. cit. (23), p. 197.

54 India: regulations regarding the grant of honourary commissions in the RAF, The National Archives (subsequently TNA), London, Air Ministry Files (subsequently AIR) 2/4912.

55 Operations Record Book (ORB), Royal Air Force Station Jodhpur, 28 August 1942, TNA, AIR 28/406.

56 Operations Record Book (ORB), Royal Air Force Station Jodhpur, 11 August 1942, op. cit. (55).

57 Vacher, op. cit. (15), p. 100.

58 Copland, op. cit. (4), pp. 187–9.

59 Chief engineer, Jodhpur, to Development Secretary, Jodhpur, 6 May 1947, MMA, M-KHAS AVIATION-NO-13 P-3 FN-C-3 B-NO-02-YEAR-1947.

60 The Indian Air Force was given the title ‘royal’ by the king-emperor in recognition for its wartime service in 1945.

61 Political agent, Rajputana States, to prime minister, Jodhpur, MMA, M-KHAS AVIATION-NO-13 P-3 FN-C-3 B-NO-02-YEAR-1947.

62 Singh, op. cit. (25), p. 177.

63 Noorani, A.G., The Kashmir Dispute, Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2014, p. 7Google Scholar.

64 Lapierre, Dominic and Collins, Larry, Freedom at Midnight, London: Granada, 1983, p. 242Google Scholar.

65 Hooja, op. cit. (22), p. 1143.

66 Arnold, op. cit. (10), p. 9.

67 Ferguson, Jane M., ‘Flight school for the spirit of Myanmar: aerial nationalism and Burmese–Japanese cinematic collaboration in the 1930s,’ South East Asia Research (September 2018) 26(3), pp. 268–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Zaidi, Waqar, ‘Pakistani civil aviation and U.S. aid to Pakistan, 1950 to 1961’, History of Global Arms Transfer (2019) 8, pp. 8397Google Scholar.

69 BL, IOR/V/27/770/5, Agreement between the Government of India and the Government of the United States of America Relating to Air Services (New Delhi, 1946).