¹ For a similar characterisation applied by Victor Hugo to the history of literature, see p. 1239n. of the present volume. For Cuvier, see his Discours de réception on entry to the Académie française, 27 August, 1818, Receuil des éloges historiques 3 vols., Paris–Strasbourg, 1819–1827, II, 443–67Google Scholar; Outram, Dorinda, ‘The language of natural power: the éloges of Georges Cuvier’, History of Science, 1978, 16, 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² Sarton, George, Introduction to the history of Science, 5 vols., Washington, 1927–1948.Google Scholar

³ E.g. Bilancioni, Guglielmo, Veteris vestigia flammae: pagine storiche della scienza nostra (Rome, 1922)Google Scholar; reviewed in Isis, 1923, 5, 475–77.Google Scholar

⁴ Jay, Martin, The dialectical imagination: a history of the Frankfurt School (Berkeley, 1973)Google Scholar; Ginzburg, Carlo, ‘Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and Scientific method’, History workshop, 1980, 9, 5–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; also in Ombre Rosse, 06 1979, 39Google Scholar, and Gargani, A., Crisi della Ragione, Turin, 1979Google Scholar; Ginzburg, Carlo, ‘High and low: the theme of forbidden knowledge in the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries’, Past and Present, 1976, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Fabbroni's career is currently being explored in depth by Renato Pasta (University of Princeton); see also Dorinda Outram, ‘Politics, publicisation and natural history: the correspondence of Georges Cuvier and Giovanni Fabbroni’, to appear, Richerche storiche, 1981.Google Scholar

⁶ E.g. da Como, Ugo, I comizi nazionali in Lione per la Costituzione della Repubblica italiana: vol. III, fase. 2: Notizie biografiche dei deputati, Bologna, 1940.Google Scholar

⁷ Landucci, Giovanni, Darwinismo a Firenze: tra scienza e ideologia, 1860–1900, Florence, 1977Google Scholar; Pancaldi, Giuliano, Charles Darwin: ‘storia’ ed ‘economia’ della natura, Florence, 1977.Google Scholar

⁸ Piveteau, Jacques, ‘Le débat entre Cuvier et Geoffroy St Hilaire sur l'unité de plan et de composition’, Revue d'histoire des sciences et de leurs applications, 1950, 3, 343–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar