Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:38:08.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Endocrinology and expectations in 1930s America: Louis Berman's ideas on new creations in human beings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2007

CHRISTER NORDLUND
Affiliation:
Department of Historical Studies, Umeå University, SE 901 87 Umeå, Sweden. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

In the first half of the twentieth century, hormones took pride of place as life's master molecules and the endocrinologist took precedence over the geneticist as the scientist offering the means to control life. But, as with molecular genetics and biotechnology today, the status of endocrinology was not based solely on contemporary scientific and medical practices. To a high degree it was also reliant on expectations or visions of what endocrinologists would soon be able to do. Inspired by the approach of social studies of techno-scientific expectations, the aim of this article is to explore some of the great expectations connected to the development of endocrinology in the 1930s. The analysis is based on popular books written by the American physician and endocrinologist Louis Berman. The paper argues that Berman thought not only that it was perfectly possible to understand human nature through hormone analysis but that endocrinologists would be able to control, design and ‘improve’ humans by using hormone replacement therapy. Furthermore, in contrast to most of the eugenics of his time, Berman suggested that the whole population of the world should be improved. As a political activist he wanted to contribute to the development of new human beings, ‘ideal normal persons’, thereby reaching an ‘ideal society’. That HRT could involve risks was something that he seems not to have taken into account.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper draws on two articles previously published in Swedish: ‘Naturliga drivkrafter och universalsmörjelser: Om hormoner och hormonterapi ur ett idéhistoriskt perspektiv’, Thule: Kungl. Skytteanska Samfundets Årsbok (2003), 23–42; ‘Hormoner och visioner i mellankrigstid: Louis Bermans idéer om möjligheten att förädla mänskligheten’, Lychnos: Årsbok för idé- och lärdomshistoria (2004), 179–206. For their help in the process of finishing this article the author would like to thank Dr Soraya de Chadarevian, Dr Stephen Fruitman, Prof. Kjell Jonsson and the anonymous referees. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the British Society for the History of Science's Annual Conference in Liverpool 2004, and at the conference ‘Idéhistoria på gång’ in Umeå 2005. I thank the participants for their remarks, and the Swedish Foundation for Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT) for sponsoring my postdoc visit at Clare Hall and the Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University, UK.