Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T16:12:34.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Charles Lyell and G. B. Brocchi: A Study in Comparative Historiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Paul J. McCartney
Paul J. McCartney
Affiliation:
Walfson College, Oxford OX2 6UD.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the second volume of the Principles of geology Lyell had occasion to speak of G. B. Brocchi, ‘whose untimely death in Egypt’, he said, ‘is deplored by all who have the progress of geology at heart’. Whatever he understood to be the debt of other geologists to that Italian fossil conchologist, Lyell himself owed him much for providing scientific data and interpretations integrated in his own geological synthesis, but especially for furnishing the escutcheon of the third chapter in the review of the history of geology which Lyell appended as a late but enthusiastic embellishment to the Principles of geology. The ‘Discorso sui progressi dello studio della conchiologia fossile in Italia’, an eighty-page essay on the history of his subject, was contained in the first volume of Brocchi's Conchiologia fossile subappennina and afforded Lyell succinct notices on Italian geologists from the sixteenth century to his own time, as well as cues for the introduction of other non-Italian sources.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , July 1976 , pp. 175 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Principles of geology, being an attempt to explain the former changes of the earth's surface, by reference to causes now in operation (3 vols., London, 1830–1833), ii. 128.Google Scholar
2 See Wilson, Leonard G., Charles Lyell: The years to 1841: the revolution in geology (New Haven and London, 1972), p. 267.Google Scholar
3Brocchi, G. B. (1772–1826), Conchiologia fossile subappennina con osservazioni geologiche sugli appennini e sul suolo adjacente (2 vols., Milan, 1814), i. pp. I–LXXX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 See for example Rudwick, Martin J. S., ‘The strategy of Lyell's Principles of geology’, Isis, lxi (1970), 4–33. A number of contributors to this Charles Lyell Centenary Symposium also discuss the merits of Lyell's history of geology.Google Scholar
5 E. B. Bailey speaks enthusiastically of these historical essays ‘since splendidly expanded by Geikie in his Founders of geology and Zittel in his History of the same’; see Bailey, , Charles Lyell (London 1962), p. 81. A. Geikie also consulted Brocchi's Discourse and included information from it omitted by Lyell (see note 27 for an example).Google Scholar
6 Quoted by Giacomini, V. in Dizionario biografico degli Italiani (17 volumes to 1974, Rome), xiv (1972), 397. The translation is mine, as are all the following from Brocchi's Discourse.Google Scholar
8 See Lyell, , op. cit. (1), ii. 128 ff.,Google Scholar
and Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. 219–40.Google Scholar
9 See Lyell, , op. cit., (1), i. 135–7.Google Scholar
10 Letter of Greenough, G. B. to De la Beche, H. T., [12 1834],Google Scholar
De la Beche papers, National Museum of Wales, Cardiff. Wilson, , op. cit. (2), p. 219, makes the curious and unverifiable assertion thatGoogle Scholar
10Lyell, , op. cit. (1), ii. 33.Google Scholar
Internal evidence seems to indicate that Moro, Lazzaro's De'crostacei e degli altri marini corpi che si truovano su’ monti (2 vols., Venice 1740) and Generelli's presentation of the ideas contained in that workGoogle Scholar
(De’crostacei e di altre produzioni del mare [1749])Google Scholar
were the only other Italian works extensively consulted by Lyell. The impression of considerable research was achieved by Lyell's copying from Brocchi not only the text but also the footnotes. This impression has remained with some until very recently. E. B. Bailey says that ‘Lyell's familiarity with Italian and other literature concerning long-continued gropings after geological truths fills readers with admiration’; see Bailey, , op. cit. (5), p. 82.Google Scholar
11Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. p. I. See also i. 302, where Brocchi delcares his preference for a division of geological time into an initial period and an actual period (aspetto attuale).Google Scholar
12Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. p. II. Italics mine. For the sake of brevity, this view of Brocchi will be referred to in these terms.Google Scholar
13Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. pp. II–III.Google Scholar
14Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. 8.Google Scholar
15 Of Moro, 's theory, Brocchi asks the question:Google Scholar
‘In his lifetime, Brocchi was reproached for having tarried in the Neptunism of Werner at a time when Breislak had already openly propounded Plutonism. But as a result of the vast number of observations carried out on volcanic areas of the Peninsula, he publicly changed his mind’ (Giacomini, , op. cit. [6], xiv. 399).Google Scholar
16Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. chapter III, passim.Google Scholar
17Brocchi, , op. cit., (3), i. p. IV.Google Scholar
The statement made by Brocchi about Alessandro degli Alessandrini was used by Lyell, without acknowledgement, when he affirmed that a ‘change in the inclination of the earth's axis … was a leading dogma in Burnet's system’ and was not original,Google Scholar
‘for it was borrowed from an Italian Alessandro degli Alessandrini, who had suggested it in the beginning of the fifteenth century to account for the former occupation of the present continents by the sea’ (Lyell, , op. cit. [1], i. 39).Google Scholar
18Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. pp. IV–V.Google Scholar
19‘Quante dispute, quanti traviamenti e quanta tempo perduto!’; see Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. p. XXI.Google Scholar
20Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 29.Google Scholar
21Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 4.Google Scholar
22Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 20.Google Scholar
23Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 21–3.Google Scholar
24Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 23–4.Google Scholar
25Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. p. V.Google Scholar
26Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 26.Google Scholar
27Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. pp. V–VI.Google Scholar
The final sentence of this notice is an example of information from Brocchi added by Geikie, to Lyell, 's account. See The founders of geology (2nd edn., 1905; Dover reprint, New York, 1962), p. 52.Google Scholar
28Lyell, , op. cit. (i), i. 25–6.Google Scholar
29 The use of analogy by Agricola and his contemporaries is a major methodological device which literal translation often overlooks. What might Lyell have said about the remark of his eminent palaeontological contemporary John Phillips when working on the fossils of the Marloes Bay section of the Geological Survey: ‘I think in 1842–3 to draw whatever is most striking on or near the spot where it grew.’?; see letter of Phillips, J. to De la Beche, H. T., 5 03 1842, De la Beche papers, National Museum of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
30Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. p. VI.Google Scholar
31Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 25–6.Google Scholar
32Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. pp. VII–VIII.Google Scholar
33Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 26.Google Scholar
34Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 27.Google Scholar
Brocchi's account has the year 1574 in the margin, intended probably to date the formation of the collection, and it notices the publication of the description of it ‘by Lancisi under the auspices of Clement XI nearly a century and a half later’; see Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. p. VII.Google Scholar
35Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. p. VIII.Google Scholar
36Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 26.Google Scholar
37Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. p. XIV.Google Scholar
38Brocchi, Google Scholar
39Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. p. XV.Google Scholar
40Brocchi, Google Scholar
41Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 27–8.Google Scholar
42Lyell, Google Scholar
43Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. pp. XV–XVI.Google Scholar
44 See Rudwick, Martin J. S., The meaning of fossils (New York and London, 1972), p. 58. The first two chapters of this work afford excellent examples of a discussion of the scientific dilemmas of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century thinkers which takes into account the contemporary intellectual framework of their opinions.Google Scholar
45Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. pp. XV–XVI.Google Scholar
46Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 29.Google Scholar
47Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. pp. XVI–XVII.Google Scholar
48Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 30–1.Google Scholar
49Brocchi, , op. cit. (3), i. pp. XXXVII–XXXVIII.Google Scholar
50Lyell, , op. cit. (1), i. 42.Google Scholar
51SirSidney, Philip, An apology for poetry (1595).Google Scholar