¹ Cf. Durkheim, Emile, The elementary forms of the religious life (London, 1915)Google Scholar; Evans-Pritchard, E. E., Witchcraft oracles and magic among the Azande (London, 1937).Google Scholar

² Purity and danger (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966)Google Scholar; Natural symbols (London: Barrie & Rockliff, The Cresset Press, 1970)Google Scholar; Rules and meanings (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973).Google Scholar

³ E.g. McGuire, J. E. and Rattansi, P. M., ‘Newton and the “Pipes of Pan”’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, xxi (1966), 108–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McGuire, J. E., ‘Force, active principles, and Newton's invisible realm’, Ambix, xv (1968), 157–208.Google Scholar

⁴ Cowan, Ruth Schwartz, ‘Francis Galton's statistical ideas: the influence of eugenics’, Isis, lxiii (1972), 509–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Forman, Paul, ‘Weimar culture, causality and quantum theory, 1918–1927: adaptation by German physicists and mathematicians to a hostile intellectual environment’, Historical studies in the physical sciences, iii (1971), 1–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and note the explicit appeal to anthropology in his ‘The discovery of the diffraction of X-rays by crystals: a critique of the myths’, Archive for history of exact sciences, vi (1969), 38–71.Google Scholar

⁶ E.g. Rudwick, M. J. S., The meaning of fossils (London: MacDonald, 1972)Google Scholar; MacKenzie, Donald and Barnes, Barry, ‘Biometrician versus Mendelian: a controversy and its explanation’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, xviii (1975), 165–96.Google Scholar

⁷ E.g. Rattansi, P. M., ‘The Helmontian-Galenist controversy in Restoration England’, Ambix, xii (1964), 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shapin, S., ‘Phrenological knowledge and the social structure of early nineteenth-century Edinburgh’, Annals of science, xxxii (1975), 219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸ Notably his ‘Malthus and the evolutionists: the common context of biological and social theory’, Past and present, No. 43 (1969), 109–45Google Scholar; but see also his citation of Douglas's views in ‘The historiographic and ideological contexts of the nineteenth-century debate on man's place in nature’, in Teich, M. and Young, R. M. (eds.), Changing perspectives in the history of science (London: Heinemann, 1973), pp. 344–438 (434–5).Google Scholar

⁹ E.g. Jacob, M. C., ‘The Church and the formulation of die Newtonian world-view’, Journal of European studies, i (1971), 128–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and ‘John Toland and the Newtonian ideology’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, xxxii (1969), 307–31.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Hill, Christopher, ‘William Harvey and the idea of monarchy’, Past and present, No. 37 (1964), 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Miller, Jonathan, ‘The dog beneath the skin’, The listener (20 07 1972), pp. 74–6.Google Scholar

¹² Cf. Bloor, David, ‘Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the sociology of mathematics’, Studies in history and philosophy of science, iv (1973), 173–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barnes, Barry, Scientific knowledge and sociological theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974).Google Scholar

¹³ Hesse, Mary, The structure of scientific inference (London: Macmillan, 1974)Google Scholar; Bloor, David, ‘Epistemology or psychology?’, Studies in history and philosophy of science, v (1974–1975), 382–95Google Scholar; idem., Knowledge and social imagery (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976)Google Scholar. Cf. also Bhaskar, Roy, A realist theory of science (Leeds: Leeds Books, 1975).Google Scholar