Article contents
Extract
One of the difficulties with which scientific endeavour is fraught is that of maintaining detachment. The scientist's interest in his work will lead him to formulate hypotheses and the hypotheses will lead him to expectations about future observations. Is disinterested investigation then possible? Surely the very formulation of a hypothesis engenders a paternal affection and a desire to preserve it. Knowing this, however, the scientist is able to guard against his expectations influencing his observations, defending thus both his objectivity and his honour. But in cases where discriminations are exceptionally difficult to make, then here perhaps, in spite of fore-knowledge of the danger, and in spite of all precautions, an expectation may influence a judgement.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1967
References
1 Phil. Trans., lxxi (1781), part ii, 498.Google Scholar
2 The author wishes to thank Professor J. B. Thornton for drawing his attention to this interesting anomaly.
3 Ibid., 492.
4 Ibid., 493
5 Ibid., 494
6 Phil. Trans., lxxiii (1783), part i, 11.Google Scholar
7 The oblateness of Jupiter is easily seen through a small telescope. The measure of oblateness is
8 The last two effects described in personal communication from Professor R. H. Day, Monash University.
9 Personal communication J. R. Trotter, Australian National University.
10 Phil. Trans., lxxi (1781), part ii, 495.Google Scholar
11 Ibid., 494.
12 Singer, G., Variables in Suggestibility. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by