Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:12:58.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a transnational industrial-hazard history: charting the circulation of workplace dangers, debates and expertise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2012

CHRISTOPHER SELLERS  and
JOSEPH MELLING
CHRISTOPHER SELLERS
Affiliation:
Department of History, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4348, United States. Email: [email protected].
JOSEPH MELLING
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4RJ, UK. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that industrial hazards have remained an integral feature of the international and ‘global’ economy since the early modern period, and invite historians of science into the study of their history. The growth and dissemination of knowledge about these hazards, as well as the production and trade that generate them, continue to generate deep inequalities in just who is exposed to them, as illustrated by the shifting impact of the asbestos-related disease plague in the past half-century. Exposure levels in poorer countries have risen as those in affluent societies have fallen, the latter due as much to popular protest and media exposure as to scientific expertise. We suggest that the best way to understand the formation of knowledge about these hazards is not to return to the epistemological battlegrounds of the ‘science wars’ of the 1990s but to seek more interdisciplinary integration of the multifaceted ways that material bodies, environments and interests contribute to an understanding of such hazards and injuries. We propose the framework of ‘industrial-hazard regimes’ as an avenue into the ways in which knowledge about risks and dangers at work are created, translated and contested in different countries and times. While urging a return, in some respects, to the early models of ‘progressive enlightenment’ devised by radical commentators and pioneering historians of the industrial hazard in the early twentieth century, we would revise these early approaches, and also offer some sceptical commentary on the difficulties raised, more recently, by narratives of ‘heroic populism’ or ‘anti-science epidemiology’. The critical standpoints for which we argue recognize the diverse social and political identities and loyalties not only of past contributors to the controversies on industrial hazard, but also of historians of science and medicine themselves.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 45 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Transnational History of Science , September 2012 , pp. 401 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tweedale, Geoffrey and McCulloch, Jock, Defending the Indefensible, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar.

2 Castleman, Barry and Joshi, Tushar Kant, ‘Global asbestos struggle today’, European Journal of Oncology (2007) 12, pp. 149–154Google Scholar; Joshi, Tushar Kant, Bhuva, Uttpal B. and Katoch, Priyanka, ‘Asbestos ban in India: challenges ahead’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2006) 1076, pp. 292–308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Subramanian, V. and Madhavan, N., ‘Asbestos problem in India’, Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (2005) 49, supplement 1, pp. S9–S12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Ansari, Furquan Ahmad et al. , ‘Monitoring and identification of airborne asbestos in unorganized sectors, India’, Chemosphere (2007) 68, pp. 716–723CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

3 Driscoll, T., Takala, J., Steenland, K., Corvalan, C. and Fingerhut, M., ‘Review of estimates of the global burden of injury and illness due to occupational exposures’, American Journal of Industrial Medicine (2005) 48, pp. 491–505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Prüss-Üstun, Annette and Corvalán, Carlos, ‘How much disease burden can be prevented by environmental interventions?’, Epidemiology (2007) 18, pp. 167–178Google ScholarPubMed.

4 Bayly, C.A., Beckert, Sven, Connelly, Matthew, Hofmeyr, Isabel, Kozol, Wendy and Seed, Patricia, ‘AHR conversation on transnational history’, American Historical Review (2006) 11, p. 1444Google Scholar (‘central concern’, ‘comparative possibility’).

5 Joseph Melling and Tim Carter, ‘Donald Hunter and the history of occupational health: precedents and perspectives’, in Peter J. Baxter et al. (eds.), Hunter's Diseases of Occupations, 10th edn, London: Arnold Hodder, 2010, pp. 5–23.

6 Oliver, Thomas, Dangerous Trades: The Historical, Social, and Legal Aspects of Industrial Occupations as Affecting Health, by a Number of Experts, London, J. Murray, 1902Google Scholar; Ramazzini, Bernardino, A Treatise of the Diseases of Tradesmen Shewing the Various Influence of Particular Trades upon the State of Health, London: Printed for Andrew Bell [and 8 others], 1705Google Scholar.

7 Legge, Thomas Morison, Shaw Lectures on Thirty Years' Experience of Industrial Maladies, London: The Society, 1929Google Scholar; Schilling, R.S.F. (Richard Selwyn Francis), Modern Trends in Occupational Health, London: Butterworths, 1960Google Scholar; Rosen, George, The History of Miners' Diseases, New York: Schuman's, 1943Google Scholar; Hamilton, Alice, Exploring the Dangerous Trades: The Autobiography of Alice Hamilton, M.D., Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1943Google Scholar; Teleky, Ludwig, History of Factory and Mine Hygiene, New York: Columbia University Press, 1948Google Scholar; Koelsch, Franz, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Arbeitsmedizin, Munich: Franz Koelsch, 1968Google Scholar.

8 Weindling, Paul and the Society for the Social History of Medicine, The Social History of Occupational Health, London: Croom Helm, 1985Google Scholar; Rosner, David and Markowitz, Gerald, Dying for Work: Workers' Safety and Health in Twentieth-Century America, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987Google Scholar.

9 See, for instance, Bayly et al., op. cit. (4), pp. 1447, 1449–1450; also Kocka, Jurgen, ‘Losses, gains and opportunities: social history today’, Journal of Social History (2003) 37, pp. 21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. 25–26.

10 Galison, Peter Louis, Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997Google Scholar.

11 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1994Google Scholar; O'Rourke, Kevin H. and Williamson, Jeffrey G., Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2001Google Scholar; Silver, Beverly J., Forces of Labor: Workers' Movements and Globalization since 1870, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hurley, Andrew, Environmental Inequalities: Class, Race, and Industrial Pollution in Gary, Indiana, 1945–1980, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995Google Scholar; White, Richard, The Organic Machine: The Remaking of the Columbia River, New York: Hill and Wang, 1996Google Scholar; Sellers, Christopher C., Hazards of the Job: From Industrial Disease to Environmental Health Science, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997Google Scholar; Rosner, David and Markowitz, Gerald, Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002Google Scholar; Nash, Linda Lorraine, Inescapable Ecologies: A History of Environment, Disease, and Knowledge, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006Google Scholar; Andrews, Thomas G., Killing for Coal: America's Deadliest Labor War, 1st edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008Google Scholar; LeCain, Timothy J., Mass Destruction the Men and Giant Mines That Wired America and Scarred the Planet, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2009Google Scholar.

12 Bullard, Robert D., Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color, San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1994Google Scholar; Pulido, Laura, Environmentalism and Economic Justice: Two Chicano Struggles in the Southwest, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1996Google Scholar; Brown, Phil and Mikkelsen, Edwin J., No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990Google Scholar; Brown, Phil and Zavestoski, Stephen, Social Movements in Health, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2005Google Scholar; Frickel, Scott and Moore, Kelly, The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2006Google Scholar; Lagroye, Jacques, Bastien, François and Sawicki, Frédéric, Sociologie politique, Paris: Presses de sciences Po et Dalloz, 2002Google Scholar; Perin, Constance, Shouldering Risks: The Culture of Control in the Nuclear Power Industry, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006Google Scholar; Perrow, Charles, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, New York: Basic Books, 1984Google Scholar.

13 Irwin, Alan and Wynne, Brian, Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter, Objectivity, 1st edn, New York: Zone Books, 2007Google Scholar; Harding, Sandra G., Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998Google Scholar.

14 Among these have been a conference organized at the University of Exeter in 2006 on Working with Dust: Health, Dust and Diseases in the History of Occupational Health, and another held at Stony Brook University in 2007 on Dangerous Trade: Histories of Industrial Hazard in a Globalizing World. Some of the latter contributions make up Sellers, Christopher and Melling, Joseph (eds.), Dangerous Trade: Histories of Industrial Hazard across a Globalizing World, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2011Google Scholar.

15 Blum, Elizabeth D., Love Canal Revisited: Race, Class, and Gender in Environmental Activism, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2008Google Scholar; McGurty, Eileen, Transforming Environmentalism: Warren County, PCBs, and the Origins of Environmental Justice, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2009Google Scholar; Sze, Julie, Noxious New York: The Racial Politics of Urban Health and Environmental Justice, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006Google Scholar; Washington, Sylvia, Goodall, Heather and Rosier, Paul, Echoes from the Poisoned Well: Global Memories of Environmental Injustice, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2006Google Scholar; Agyeman, Julian and Ogneva-Himmelberger, Yelena, Environmental Justice and Sustainability in the Former Soviet Union, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Faber, Daniel, Capitalizing on Environmental Injustice: The Polluter–Industrial Complex in the Age of Globalization, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2008Google Scholar; Pellow, David, Resisting Global Toxics: Transnational Movements for Environmental Justice, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2007Google Scholar; Carruthers, David V., Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promise, and Practice, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Castleman, Barry et al. , ‘Code of sustainable practice in occupational and environmental health and safety for corporations’, International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health (2008) 14, pp. 234–235CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

17 Daston, Lorraine, ‘Science studies and the history of science’, Critical Inquiry (2009) 25, pp. 798–813, esp. 802CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barry Barnes and David Bloor, ‘Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge’, in Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982, p. 25; Ross, Andrew, Science Wars, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996Google Scholar; Parsons, Keith M., The Science Wars: Debating Scientific Knowledge and Technology, Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 2003Google Scholar.

18 Dear, Peter and Jasanoff, Sheila, ‘Dismantling boundaries in science and technology studies’, Isis (2010) 101, pp. 759–774, esp. 771CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; calls to ‘contextualism’, as they note, go back at least as far as Steven Shapin, ‘Social uses of science’, in George Rousseau and Roy Porter (eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980, pp. 93–139.

19 For instance, Rosner, David and Markowitz, Gerald, Deadly Dust: Silicosis and the Politics of Occupational Disease in Twentieth-Century America, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991Google Scholar; for a comparison of its approach with those current in science studies see Sellers, Christopher, ‘Working disease in: silicosis, science, and the social history of medicine’, essay review for Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences (1993) 48, pp. 98–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Hacking, Ian, Historical Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004, 12Google Scholar. Daston, Lorraine (ed.), Biographies of Scientific Objects, Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 2000Google Scholar; for another application of historical ontology to an environmental topic see Hecht, Gabrielle, ‘Nuclear ontologies’, Constellations (2006) 13, pp. 320–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 White, Richard, ‘From wilderness to hybrid landscapes: the cultural turn in environmental history’, Historian (2004) 66, pp. 557–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Valencius, Conevery Bolton, The Health of the Country: How American Settlers Understood Themselves and Their Land, New York: Basic Books, 2002Google Scholar; Nash, op. cit. (11); Mitman, Gregg, Breathing Space: How Allergies Shape Our Lives and Landscapes, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007Google Scholar; Langston, Nancy, Toxic Bodies: Hormone Disruptors and the Legacy of DES, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011Google Scholar.

22 Schiebinger, Londa, Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007Google Scholar; Cook, Harold J., Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008Google Scholar; Anderson, Warwick, The Cultivation of Whiteness: Science, Health, and Racial Destiny in Australia, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006Google Scholar; Harrison, Mark, Climates and Constitutions: Health, Race, Environment, and British Imperialism in India 1600–1850, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003Google Scholar.

23 O'Rourke, Kevin, and Williamson, Jeffrey G., Globalization and the Poor Periphery before 1950, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006Google Scholar.

24 Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice, World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, Durham: Duke University Press, 2004Google Scholar; Silver, op. cit. (11).

25 Harvey, David, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 1991Google Scholar; idem, ‘The spatial fix: Hegel, Von Thunen, and Marx’, Antipode (1981) 13, pp. 1–12.

26 Greider, William, One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1997Google Scholar; Simpkins, Jackie, ‘The global workplace: challenging the race to the bottom’, Development in Practice (2004) 14, pp. 110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chan, Anita and Ross, Robert J.S., ‘Racing to the bottom: international trade without a social clause’, Third World Quarterly (2003) 24, pp. 1011–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cowie, Jefferson R., Capital Moves: RCA's Seventy-Year Quest for Cheap Labor, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999Google Scholar.

27 Grove, Richard H., Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar; McNeill, John Robert, Something New under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World, New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2000Google Scholar.

28 Tyrrell, Ian, True Gardens of the Gods: Californian–Australian Environmental Reform, 1860–1930, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999Google Scholar; Soluri, John, Banana Cultures: Agriculture, Consumption, and Environmental Change in Honduras and the United States, Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006Google Scholar; Jennifer L. Anderson, ‘Nature's currency: the Atlantic mahogany trade, 1720–1830’, PhD dissertation, New York University, 2007.

29 Patterson, C.C., ‘Contaminated and natural lead environments of Man’, Archives of Environmental Health (1965) 11, pp. 344–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nriagu, Jerome O., ‘A history of global metal pollution’, Science (1996) New Series 272, pp. 223–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Sellers, Christopher C., ‘Cross-nationalizing the history of industrial hazard’, Medical History (2010) 54, pp. 315–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

31 Morello-Frosch, Rachel and Shenassa, Edmond D., ‘The environmental “riskscape” and social inequality: implications for explaining maternal and child health disparities’, Environmental Health Perspectives (2006) 114, pp. 1150–1153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Muller-Mahn, Detlef, The Spatial Dimension of Risk: How Geography Shapes the Emergence of Riskscapes, Oxford: Earthscan Ltd, 2011Google Scholar.

32 Our definition loosely parallels that of the ‘urban regime’ which has helped enable comparative study of cities, also Michelle Murphy's ‘regimes of imperceptibility’: Mossberger, Karen and Stoker, Gerry, ‘The evolution of urban regime theory: the challenge of conceptualization’, Urban Affairs Review (2001) 36, pp. 810–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Murphy, Michelle, Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 See the essays in Sellers and Melling, op. cit. (14); also Henry, Emmanuel, Amiante, un scandale improbable: Sociologie d'un problème public, Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Massard-Guilbaud, Genvieve, Histoire de la pollution industrielle, France 1789–1914, Paris: EHESS, 2010Google Scholar.

34 Broughton, Edward, ‘The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review’, Environmental Health (2005) 4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, available at www.ehjournal.net/content/4/1/6, accessed 12 August 2010; Fortun, Kim, Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, Disaster, New Global Orders, Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Petryna, Adriana, Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002Google Scholar; Smith, Jim and Beresford, Nicholas A., Chernobyl: Catastrophe and Consequences, New York: Springer, 2005Google Scholar.

35 Ong, Aihwa and Collier, Stephen, Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, Malden: Blackwell, 2005Google Scholar; Sassen, Saskia, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006Google Scholar.

36 Joseph Melling and Christopher Sellers, ‘Objective collectives? Transnationalism and “invisible colleges” in occupational and environmental health from Collis to Selikoff’, in Sellers and Melling, op. cit. (14); Rosental, Paul-André, Cayet, Thomas and Thebaud-Sorger, Marie, ‘How international organisations compete: occupational safety and health at the ILO, a diplomacy of expertise’, Journal of Modern European History (2009) 7, pp. 174–196Google Scholar; Haas, Peter M., ‘Banning chlorofluorocarbons: epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone’, International Organization (1992) 46, pp. 187–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Tweedale and McCulloch, op. cit. (1).

38 Harvey, ‘The spatial fix’, op. cit. (25); Santiago, Myrna I., The Ecology of Oil: Environment, Labor, and the Mexican Revolution, 1900–1938, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Auyero, Javier and Swistun, Débora Alejandra, Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009Google Scholar; Davis, Mike, Planet of Slums, New York: Verso, 2007Google Scholar.

39 See essays by Melling and Carter and by Bohme in Sellers and Melling, op. cit. (14).

40 For more discussion see Rosen, Christine Meisner and Sellers, Christopher C., ‘The nature of the firm: towards an ecocultural history of business’, Business History Review (1999) 73, pp. 577–600Google Scholar.

41 The above and succeeding paragraphs summarize from the essays in Sellers and Melling, op. cit. (14), and an extensive literature; on the attention to smoke in this period see Stradling, David, Smokestacks and Progressives: Environmentalists, Engineers, and Air Quality in America, 1881–1951, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002Google Scholar; Mosley, Stephen, ‘The Chimney of the World’: A History of Smoke Pollution in Victorian and Edwardian Manchester, Cambridge: White Horse Press, 2001Google Scholar.

42 See essays by Kaur and Santiago in Sellers and Melling, op. cit. (14); Kaur, Amarjit, ‘Indian labour, labour standards, and workers’ health in Burma and Malaya, 1900–1940’, Modern Asian Studies (2006) 40, pp. 425–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Santiago, op. cit. (38); Bridge, Gavin, ‘Contested terrain: mining and the environment’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources (2004) 29, pp. 205–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Packard, Randall M., White Plague, Black Labor: Tuberculosis and the Political Economy of Health and Disease in South Africa, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989Google Scholar.

43 Hecht, op. cit. (20), is a single fine example of the large literature emphasizing the nuclear threats of this period.

44 Johnston, Ronald and McIvor, Arthur, Lethal Work: A History of the Asbestos Tragedy in Scotland, East Linton, Scotland: Tuckwell, 2000Google Scholar; Tweedale, Geoffrey, Magic Mineral to Killer Dust: Turner & Newall and the Asbestos Hazard, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bartrip, Peter W.J., The Way from Dusty Death: Turner and Newall and the Regulation of Occupational Health in the British Asbestos Industry, 1890s–1970, London: Athlone Press, 2001Google Scholar; McCulloch, Jock, Asbestos Blues: Labour, Capital, Physicians & the State in South Africa, Oxford: James Currey, 2002Google Scholar; Maines, Rachel, Asbestos and Fire: Technological Tradeoffs and the Body at Risk, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2005Google Scholar; Hardy-Hémery, Odette, Eternité et l'amiante, 1922–2000: Aux sources du profit, une industrie du risque, Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 2005Google Scholar; Bayer, Ronald, The Health and Safety of Workers: Case Studies in the Politics of Professional Responsibility, New York: Oxford University Press, 1988Google Scholar.

45 Among the few related studies are Tweedale and McCulloch, op. cit. (1); Auyero and Swistun, op. cit. (38); McCulloch, op. cit. (44).

46 Hajer, Maarten A., The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mol, Arthur P.J., Globalization and Environmental Reform: The Ecological Modernization of the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003Google Scholar.

47 Friedman, Thomas L., The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005Google Scholar.

48 Baron, Ava and Boris, Eileen, ‘“The body” as a useful category for working-class history’, Labor (2007) 4, pp. 23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kasson, John, ‘Follow the bodies: commentary on “‘The body’ as a useful category for working-class history”’, Labor (2007) 4, pp. 45–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roberts, Jody A. and Langston, Nancy, ‘Toxic bodies/toxic environments: an interdisciplinary forum’, Environmental History (2008) 13, pp. 629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and articles that follow, available at www.historycooperative.org.libproxy.cc.stonybrook.edu/journals/eh/13.4/roberts.html, accessed 5 September 2009.

49 See essay by Santiago in Sellers and Melling, op. cit. (14); McIvor, Arthur and Johnston, Ronald, Miners' Lung: A History of Dust Disease in British Coal Mining, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007Google Scholar; Auyero and Swistun, op. cit. (38).

50 See essays by Menendez-Navarro and Allen in Sellers and Melling, op. cit. (14); also Menendez-Navarro, Alfredo, Un Mundo Sin Sol: La Salud de los Trabajdores de las Minas de Amaden, 1750–1900, Grenada: Universidad de Grenada, 1996Google Scholar; Allen, Barbara L., Uneasy Alchemy: Citizens and Experts in Louisiana's Chemical Corridor Disputes, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003Google Scholar.

51 Sellers, Christopher, ‘The Cold War over the worker's body’, work-in-progress; B.I. Castleman and G.E. Ziem, ‘Corporate influence on threshold limit values’, American Journal of Industrial Medicine (1988) 13, pp. 531–559Google Scholar.

52 Brown and Mikkelsen, op. cit. (12); Corburn, Jason, Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2005Google Scholar; Bloor, Michael, ‘The South Wales Miners Federation, miners’ lung and the instrumental use of expertise, 1900–1950’, Social Studies of Science (2000) 30, pp. 125–140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Allmark, P. and Tod, A., ‘How should public health professionals engage with lay epidemiology?’, Journal of Medical Ethics (2006) 32, pp. 460–463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

53 Brown, Phil, Toxic Exposures: Contested Illnesses and the Environmental Health Movement, New York: Columbia University Press, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Melling and Sellers, in Sellers and Melling, op. cit. (14).

55 See Allen and Barca essays in Sellers and Melling, op. cit. (14); Melling, Joseph, ‘Beyond a shadow of a doubt? Experts, lay knowledge, and the role of radiography in the diagnosis of silicosis in Britain, c.1919–1945’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine (2010) 84, pp. 424–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar; also Allison Hepler, ‘Your job or your life: workplace advocacy in the wake of OSHA and Earth Day’, manuscript in possession of the authors.

56 For instance, Johnson, Jay, Pecquet, Gary and Taylor, Leon, ‘Potential gains from trade in dirty industries: revisiting Lawrence Summers’ memo’, Cato Journal (2007) 24, pp. 397–410Google Scholar.