Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:29:08.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Reasons for the Rediscovery and Appreciation of Mendel's Work in the First Years of the Present Century*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

J. S. Wilkie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three questions of major historical interest may be asked concerning the neglect and the rediscovery of Mendel's work.

1. Why was it so little noticed between its publication in 1866 and its rediscovery in 1900?

2. What factors determined its rediscovery?

3. What factors favoured the rapid growth of Mendelian genetics?

It is with the second and third of these questions that this paper is concerned.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , June 1962 , pp. 5 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 de Vries, Hugo, Die Mutationstheorie, Leipzig, 1901, vol. i, p. 7.Google Scholar

2 Bateson, Beatrice, William Bateson, F.R.S., Cambridge, 1928, pp. 30–37.Google Scholar

3 Bateson, William, Materials for the Study of Variation, treated with especial regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species, London, 1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Ibid., p. 574.

5 p. 61.

6 The paper is reprinted in Bateson, Beatrice, op. cit. (2), pp. 161–170.Google Scholar

7 de Vries, Hugo, Die Mutalionstheorie, Leipzig, 1901, vol. i, pp. 7–149.Google Scholar

8 Jordan, A., De l'origine des diverses variélés ou espèces d'arbres fruitiers, Paris, 1853.Google Scholar

9 Vilmorin, L., Notices sur l'amélioration des plantes par le semis, 2nd ed., Paris, 1886.Google Scholar

10 Müller, F., Kosmos, 1886, ii, 22.Google Scholar

11 Johannsen, W., Ueber Erblichkeit in Populationen und in reinen Linien, Jena, 1903.Google Scholar

12 Haldane, J. B. S., Ency. Brit., 14th ed., vol. xi, p. 496.Google Scholar

13 Sutton, W. S., ‘The chromosomes in heredity’. Biol. Bull. Wood's Hole, 1903, iv, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 van Beneden, E., ‘Recherches sur la maturation de l'oeuf et la Fécondation’. Arch. de Biol., 1883, iv., 265.Google Scholar

15 Kölliker, R. A., Grundriss der Entwickelungsgeschichte, 2nd ed., Leipzig, 1884, p. 18.Google Scholar

16 See, for example, Strasburger, E., Hislologische Beiträge, Heft I, Jena, 1888.Google Scholar

17 Weismann, A., Das Keimplasma, eine Theorie der Vererbung, Jena, 1892, pp. 321–322.Google Scholar

18 Boveri, Th., ‘Ueber mehrpolige Mitosen als Mittel zur Analyse des Zellkerns’. Verh. phys-med. Ges. Würzburg, 1902, n.s. xxxv, 67.Google Scholar

19 Sutton, W. S., ‘On the morphology of the chromosome group in Brachystola magna’. Biol. Bull. Wood's Hole, 1902, iv, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar