Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:20:32.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Miscellaneous methods: authors, societies and journals in early modern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2000

ADRIAN JOHNS
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of California, San Diego: 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

Abstract

Historians of science have long acknowledged the important role that journals play in the scientific enterprise. They both secure the shared values of a scientific community and certify what that community takes to be licensed knowledge. The advent of the first learned periodicals in the mid-seventeenth century was therefore a major event. But why did this event happen when it did, and how was the permanence of the learned journal secured? This paper reveals some of the answers. It examines the shifting fortunes of one of the earliest of natural-philosophical periodicals, the Philosophical Transactions, launched in London in 1665 by Henry Oldenburg. The paper shows how fraught the enterprise of journal publishing was in the Europe of that period, and, not least, it draws attention to a number of publications that arose out of the commercial realm of the Restoration to rival (or parody) Oldenburg's now famous creation. By doing so it helps restore to view the hard work that underpinned the republic of letters.

And as for natural philosophy, is it not removed from Oxford and Cambridge to Gresham College in London, and to be learned out of their gazettes?

Thomas Hobbes, Behemoth (written c. 1668).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)