¹ The literature on the culture of British science during the first half of the nineteenth century is now vast. The classic is Cannon, S., Science in Culture, New York, 1978.Google Scholar For an overview of some more recent literature see Morus, I. R., Schaffer, S. and Secord, J., ‘Scientific London’, in London: World City, 1800–1840 (ed. Fox, C.), New Haven, 1992, 129–42.Google Scholar

² Berman, M., Social Change and Scientific Organization: The Royal Institution, 1799–1844, London, 1978.Google Scholar

³ Morrell, J. and Thackray, A., Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Oxford, 1981.Google Scholar

⁴ Boas-Hall, M., All Scientists Now, Cambridge, 1984Google Scholar; MacLeod, R., ‘Whigs and savants: reflections on the Reform Movement in the Royal Society, 1830–1848’, in Metropolis and Province: Science in British Culture, 1780–1850 (ed. Inkster, I. and Morrell, J.), London, 1977, 55–90Google Scholar; Morus, I. R., ‘Correlation and control: William Robert Grove and the construction of a new philosophy of scientific reform’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (1991), 22, 589–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Cannon, , op. cit. (1)Google Scholar; Secord, J., Controversy in Victorian Geology, Princeton, 1985Google Scholar; Ashworth, W., ‘The calculating eye: Baily, Herschel, Babbage and the business of astronomy’, BJHS (1994), 27, 409–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶ Grove, W. R., On the Correlation of Physical Forces, London, 1846Google Scholar; Morus, I. R., ‘The Politics of Power: Reform and Regulation in the Work of William Robert Grove’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1989Google Scholar; and Morus, , op. cit. (4).Google Scholar

⁷ [Chambers, R.], Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, London, 1844Google Scholar, new edition with Introduction by J. Secord, Chicago, 1994; Secord, J., ‘Behind the veil: Robert Chambers and Vestiges’, in History, Humanity and Evolution (ed. Moore, J. R.), Cambridge, 1989, 165–94.Google Scholar

⁸ For a discussion of such literature see Dolby, R. G. A., ‘On the autonomy of pure science: the construction and maintenance of barriers between scientific establishments and popular culture’, in Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies (ed. Elias, N., Martins, H. and Whitley, R.), Dordrecht, 1982, 267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹ See Laudan, R., ‘Natural alliance or forced marriage? Changing relations between the histories of science and technology’, Technology and Culture (1995), 36 (Supplement), S17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰ Burke, P., Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe, London, 1978Google Scholar; Darnton, R., The Great Cat Massacre, Harmondsworth, 1984Google Scholar; Thompson, E. P., Customs in Common, Harmondsworth, 1993.Google Scholar

¹¹ Williams, R., Culture and Society, Harmondsworth, 1961Google Scholar; Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (eds.), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge, 1983Google Scholar; Colley, L., Britons: Forging the Nation 1707–1837, New Haven, 1992.Google Scholar

¹² For an overview of recent discussions of the historiography of popular science see Cooter, R. and Pumfrey, S., ‘Separate spheres and public places: reflections on the history of science popularization and science in popular culture’, History of Science (1994), 32, 237–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a discussion of ‘cultural’ studies of the sciences see Dear, P., ‘Cultural history of science: an overview with reflections’, Science, Technology, and Human Values (1995), 20, 150–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³ The term ‘cultural space’ here is used to suggest a more generalized notion of the concept of ‘evidential context’ introduced by Trevor Pinch to define the setting within which particular episodes of experimental work gain their significances. See Pinch, T., ‘Towards an analysis of scientific observation: the externality and evidential significance of observational reports in physics’, Social Studies of Science (1985), 15, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ Babbage, C., Reflections on the Decline of Science in England, London, 1830Google Scholar; and The Exposition of 1851, London, 1851.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Babbage, C., On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures, London, 1832Google Scholar; Ashworth, , op. cit. (5).Google Scholar

¹⁶ Schaffer, S., ‘Babbage's intelligence: calculating engines and the factory system’, Critical Inquiry (1994), 21, 203–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Behagg, C., ‘Secrecy, ritual and folk violence: the opacity of the workplace in the first half of the nineteenth century’, in Popular Culture and Custom in Nineteenth-Century England (ed. Storch, R.), London, 1982, 154–79.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Prothero, I., Artisans and Politics in early Nineteenth-Century London: John Gast and his Times, London, 1981Google Scholar; Rule, J., ‘The property of skill in the period of manufacture’, in The Historical Meanings of Work (ed. Joyce, P.), Cambridge, 1987, 99–118.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Behagg, , op. cit. (17).Google Scholar

²⁰ [Wright, T.], Habits and Customs of the Working Classes, by a Journeyman Engineer, London, 1867, 85.Google Scholar

²¹ Behagg, C., ‘The democracy of work, 1820–1850’, British Trade Unionism, 1780–1850: The Formative Years (ed. Rule, John), London, 1988, 162–77.Google Scholar

²² See, for example, Senior, N., An Outline of the Science of Political Economy, London, 1836.Google Scholar An exhaustive analysis of contemporary discussions of machinery is Berg, M., The Machinery Question and the Making of Political Economy, Cambridge, 1980.Google Scholar

²³ Babbage, , op. cit. (15).Google Scholar

²⁴ Babbage, , op. cit. (15), 175.Google Scholar This became known as the ‘Babbage principle’. See Braverman, H., Labor and Monopoly Capital, New York, 1974.Google Scholar

²⁵ Babbage, , op. cit. (15), 174 and 54.Google Scholar

²⁶ Barlow, P., A Treatise on the Manufactures and Machinery of Great Britain, London, 1836, 91.Google Scholar

²⁷ Ure, A., The Philosophy of Manufactures, London, 1835, 13–14.Google Scholar

²⁸ For a comparative study of Babbage and Ure on these matters see Rosenbloom, R. S., ‘Men and machines: some nineteenth century analyses of mechanization’, Technology and Culture (1964), 5, 489–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁹ Ure, , op. cit. (27), 20–1.Google Scholar

³⁰ Ure, , op. cit. (27), 301.Google Scholar Things had clearly changed a great deal by the time Engels visited much the same mills a decade later. Engels, F., Condition of the Working Class in England, Harmondsworth, 1987Google Scholar; originally published in German, 1845.

³¹ Gaskell, P., Artisans and Machinery, London, 1836.Google Scholar

³² Gaskell, P., op. cit. (31), 357–8.Google Scholar

³³ Gaskell, P., op. cit. (31), 361–2.Google Scholar

³⁴ Hodgskin, T., Popular Political Economy, London, 1827.Google Scholar

³⁵ See, for example, the excerpt from the Pioneer in Berg, M., Technology and Toil in Nineteenth Century Britain, London, 1979, 90–1.Google Scholar

³⁶ Hodgskin, T., Natural and Artificial Rights to Property Contrasted, London, 1832, 180–1.Google Scholar

³⁷ Wahrman, D., Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain, c. 1780–1840, Cambridge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁸ Anderson, P., The Printed Image and the Transformation of Popular Culture, 1790–1860, Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar

³⁹ ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, 99–102.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ ‘Preface’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, pp. iii–iv, on p. iii.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Russell, C., Science and Social Change, 1700–1900, London, 1983, 139–46Google Scholar; Golinski, J., Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820, Cambridge, 1992, 243–5.Google Scholar

⁴² ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, op. cit. (39), 99–100.Google Scholar

⁴³ Kelly, T., George Birkbeck, Pioneer of Adult Education, Liverpool, 1957.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ McCalman, I., Radical Underworld: Prophets, Revolutionaries and Pornographers in London, 1795–1840, Cambridge, 1988, 181–203Google Scholar; Royle, E. and Walvin, J., English Radicals and Reformers, 1760–1848, London, 1982, 124–41.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Omega, , ‘London Mechanics' Institute’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, 147–8, on 147.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, 210–11, on 210.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ ‘Public meeting for the establishment of the London Mechanics' Institute’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, 177–92.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Mechanic's Magazine, op. cit. (47), 188.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Mechanic's Magazine, op. cit. (47), 190.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Telltruth, Tom, ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, 195–8, on 196.Google Scholar

⁵¹ L.M., ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, 234–6, on 236.Google Scholar

⁵² ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, 236–8.Google Scholar

⁵³ ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, 227–9.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ McCalman, , op. cit. (44), 183–4.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Berg, , op. cit. (22), 169–73.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, Mechanic's Magazine (1824), 2, 306–8, on 308.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Shapin, S. and Barnes, B., ‘Science, nature and control: interpreting Mechanics' Institutes’, Social Studies of Science (1977), 7, 31–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁸ Behagg, C., Politics and Production in the Early Nineteenth Century, London, 1990.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, Mechanic's Magazine (1824), 3, 187–92, on 192.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ ‘London Mechanics' Institution’, Mechanic's Magazine (1825), 4, 232–40, on 239.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Mechanic's Magazine, op. cit. (60), 239.Google Scholar

⁶² Mechanic's Magazine, op. cit. (60), 239.Google Scholar

⁶³ Rule, , op. cit. (18)Google Scholar; Prothero, , op. cit. (18).Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Hodgskin, , op. cit. (36).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Herschel, J., Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Knowledge, London, 1830, 70.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Telltruth, , op. cit. (50)Google Scholar. Drives towards a new respectability by artisan radicals are well documented. See McCalman, , op. cit. (44)Google Scholar; Prothero, , op. cit. (18)Google Scholar, as well as Francis Place's autobiography: Thale, M. (ed.), The Autobiography of Francis Place, Cambridge, 1972.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Dutton, H., The Patent System and Inventive Activity during the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1852, Manchester, 1984.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Dutton, , op. cit. (67), 110.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Dutton, , op. cit. (67), 69–75Google Scholar; MacLeod, C., Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1600–1800, Cambridge, 1988, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁰ Bathe, D. and Bathe, G., Jacob Perkins: His Inventions, his Times and his Contemporaries, Philadelphia, 1943.Google Scholar For his Philadelphia background see Sinclair, B., Philadelphia's Philosopher Mechanics, Baltimore, 1974.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Stokes, M. V., ‘The Lowther Arcade in the Strand’, London Topographical Record (1974), 23, 119–28.Google Scholar

⁷² Altick, R., The Shows of London, Cambridge, MA, 1978.Google Scholar

⁷³ ‘New Exhibition Room, Adelaide Street, Strand’, Literary Gazette (1832), 16, 378.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Quoted in Altick, , op. cit. (72), 377.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Society for the Illustration and Encouragement of Practical Science, Gallery for the Exhibition of Objects Blending Instruction with Amusement, Adelaide Street, and Lowther Arcade, West Strand. Catalogue for May, 1836, 14th edn, London, 1836.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Catalogue, op. cit. (75), 37.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Menebrea, L. F., ‘Sketch of the analytic engine invented by Charles Babbage’Google Scholar (tr. A. Lovelace), Taylor's Scientific Memoirs (1843), 3, 666–731, on 706.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Ferguson, E. S. (ed.), Early Engineering Reminiscences (1815–40) of George Escol Sellars, Washington, DC, 1965, 131–2.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ For a contemporary account of the financial role of the coffee houses see [Evans, D. M.], City Men and City Manners: The City; or, the Physiology of London Business, London, 1852.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Saxton Diary, Smithsonian Institution Archives, Washington, DC, 17 November 1832.

⁸¹ Cunningham, P., Handbook of London, Past and Present, 2nd edn, London, 1850Google Scholar; Punch (1843), 5, 91.Google Scholar

⁸² Adelaide Gallery Handbill, Adelaide Gallery File, Theatre Museum, London.

⁸³ Harris, N., Humbug, Boston, MA, 1973, 98.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Poe, E. A., ‘The balloon-hoax’, The Science Fiction of Edgar Allen Poe (ed. Beaver, H.), Harmondsworth, 1976, 110–23Google Scholar, first published anonymously in the New York Sun, 13 April 1844.

⁸⁵ Mason, T. M., Remarks on the Ellipsoidal Balloon, London, 1843.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ ‘The Royal Polytechnic Institution’, Patent Journal and Inventor's Magazine (1848), 4, 256–7, on 157.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ ‘The Royal Polytechnic Institution’, Patent Journal and Inventor's Magazine (1848), 4, 411.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Cunningham, , op. cit. (81).Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Nowrojee, J. and Merwanjee, H., Journal of a Residence of Two and a Half years in Great Britain, London, 1841, 120.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Lampe, D., The Tunnel, London, 1964.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Beamish, R., Memoir of the Life of Sir Marc Isambard Brunel, London, 1862.Google Scholar

⁹² Beamish, , op. cit. (91), 206.Google Scholar

⁹³ Beamish, , op. cit. (91), 208–10.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Cooper, C., ‘The Portsmouth system of manufacture’, Technology and Culture (1984), 25, 182–225, on 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹⁵ Beamish, , op. cit. (91), 213.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Babbage, C., Passages from the Life of a Philosopher, London, 1864, 279.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Beamish, , op. cit. (91), 208.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Brunel, M. I., ‘Description of a new plan of tunneling, calculated for opening a roadway under the Thames’, Mechanic's Magazine (1823), 1, 65–7, on 66–7.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ ‘The Thames Tunnel’, Mirror of Literature, Amusement and Instruction (1836), 27, 160Google Scholar; ibid. (1837), 29, 208.

¹⁰⁰ Hawthorne, N., English Notebooks, London, 1941, 232–3.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Lampe, , op. cit. (90), 210Google Scholar

¹⁰² ‘National Gallery of Practical Science’, Literary Gazette (1833), 17, 730.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Morus, I. R., ‘Currents from the underworld: electricity and the technology of display in early Victorian England’, Isis (1993), 84, 50–69.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Extracts from the Private Letters of the Late Sir William Fothergill Cooke, London, 1895, 8.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Wheatstone, Charles to Cooke, William Fothergill, 20 01 1838Google Scholar. Cooke Papers, vol. 1, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London.

¹⁰⁶ ‘National Repository’, Mechanic's Magazine (1829), 11, 58–60, on 60.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ The earliest were of course contemporary. Babbage, , op. cit. (15)Google Scholar; Ure, , op. cit. (27).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Richards, T., The Commodity Culture of Victorian England, London, 1991.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Morus, I. R., ‘Different experimental lives: Michael Faraday and William Sturgeon’, History of Science (1992), 30, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹⁰ Berg, , op. cit. (22).Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Joule, J. P., ‘Experiments and observations on the mechanical powers of electro-magnetism, steam, and horses’, Scientific Papers of James Prescott Joule, 2 vols., London, 1887, ii, 1–11.Google Scholar

¹¹² Joule, , op. cit. (111), i.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Cardwell, D., James Joule: A Biography, Manchester, 1989.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Sturgeon, W., ‘Description of an electro-magnetic machine for turning machinery’, Annals of Electricity (1836), 1, 75–8.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Davenport, W. R., Thomas Davenport: Pioneer Inventor, Montpelier, VT, 1929.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ ‘Davenport's electro-magnetic engine’, Mechanic's Magazine (1837), 27, 404–5.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ ‘Electro-magnetic locomotive’, Railway Times (1842), 5, 1012.Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ L., ‘Electro-magnetic power’, Railway Times (1842), 5, 1342.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Joule, , ‘On electro-magnetic forces’, op. cit. (111), ii, 19–26, 27–39.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Joule, , op. cit. (111)Google Scholar. See also Morton, A., ‘Concepts of power: natural philosophy and the uses of machines in mid-eighteenth-century London’, BJHS (1995), 28, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹²¹ Mechanic's Magazine, op. cit. (59), 187–92, on 192.Google Scholar

¹²² Mechanic's Magazine, op. cit. (59), 92.Google Scholar

¹²³ Faraday, , quoted in the Literary Gazette, 2 02 1839.Google Scholar Quoted in Buckland, G., Fox Talbot and the Invention of Photography, London, 1980, 39.Google Scholar

¹²⁴ Grove, W. R., ‘On a voltaic process for etching daguerreotype plates’, Philosophical Magazine (1842), 20, 18–24, on 24.Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Smee, A., Elements of Electro-metallurgy, or the Art of Working in Metals by the Galvanic Fluid, London, 1841, 147.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Ryland, W., ‘The plated wares and electroplating trades’, in The Resources, Products, and Industrial History of Birmingham and the Midland Hardware District (ed. Timmins, S.), London, 1866, 494.Google Scholar

¹²⁷ Shaw, G., A Manual of Electro-metallurgy, London, 1842Google Scholar; Smee, , op. cit. (125)Google Scholar; Walker, C. V., Electrotype Manipulations, London, 1843.Google Scholar

¹²⁸ Walker, , op. cit. (127), 5–6.Google Scholar

¹²⁹ Walker, , op. cit. (127), 6.Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Walker, , op. cit. (127), 6.Google Scholar

¹³¹ On the industrialization of photography and its relationships to the electroplating industry see Bargos, S. and White, W. B., The Daguerreotype: 19th Century Technology and Modern Science, Washington, DC, 1991, 49–51.Google Scholar

¹³² Altick, , op. cit. (72).Google Scholar

¹³³ Quoted in Chilton, D. and Coley, N., ‘The laboratories of the Royal Institution in the nineteenth century’, Ambix (1980), 27, 173–203, on 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³⁴ Richards, , op. cit. (108).Google Scholar