Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2012
In the extended introduction to this special issue on British nuclear culture, the guest editors outline the main historiographical and conceptual contours of British nuclear scholarship, and explore whether we can begin to define ‘British nuclear culture’ before introducing the contributors to this special issue, whose work we have organized into three broad areas. The first part is devoted to three articles that offer explicit and extended attempts to reconceptualize British nuclear culture, illuminating the complex links between nuclear science, the state and the individual citizen. The second part of this issue is devoted to three articles that concentrate on aspects of the history of nuclear science – focusing particularly on intellectuals, nuclear scientists and enthusiasts – alongside analysis of the popularization of nuclear science as well as the relationship between the state and nuclear science and its practitioners. In the third part, four articles examine the diverse ways in which ‘official’ narratives of the atomic age can be questioned, disrupted or enhanced by analysing the significance of journalistic, anti-nuclear and fictional narratives to the development of nuclear culture in Britain.
1 Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. Mark Ritter, London: Sage, 1992Google Scholar; Hamblin, Jacob Darwin, ‘Fukushima and the motifs of nuclear history’, Environmental History (2012) 17, pp. 285–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Throughout this special issue contributors may use the terms ‘atomic’ and ‘nuclear’ interchangeably, and the same applies to this introduction.
2 The literature is extensive here. See Freedman, Michael I., ‘Frederick Soddy and the practical significance of radioactive matter’, BJHS (1979) 12, pp. 257–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sclove, Richard E., ‘From alchemy to atomic war: Frederick Soddy's “technology assessment” of atomic energy, 1900–1915’, Science, Technology and Human Values (1989) 14, pp. 163–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shire, Edward, Rutherford and the Nuclear Atom, Harlow: Longman, 1972Google Scholar; Trenn, Thaddeus J., The Self-Splitting Atom: The History of the Rutherford–Soddy Collaboration, London: Taylor and Francis, 1977Google Scholar; Trenn, Thaddeus, ‘The central role of energy in Soddy's holistic and critical approach to nuclear science, economics, and social responsibility’, BJHS (1979) 12, pp. 261–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gowing, Margaret, ‘James Chadwick and the atomic bomb’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London (1993) 47, pp. 79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, Andrew, The Neutron and the Bomb: A Biography of Sir James Chadwick, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997Google Scholar; Hartcup, Guy and Allibone, T.E., Cockcroft and the Atom, Bristol: A. Hilger, 1984Google Scholar.
3 Arnold, Lorna, ‘The history of nuclear weapons: the Frisch–Peierls memorandum on the possible construction of atomic bombs of February 1940’, Cold War History (2003) 3, pp. 111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Brown, Andrew, Keeper of the Nuclear Conscience: The Life and Work of Joseph Rotblat, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012Google Scholar; Laucht, Christoph, Elemental Germans: Klaus Fuchs, Rudolf Peierls and the Making of British Nuclear Culture 1939–59, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Arnold, Lorna, with Katherine Pyne, Britain and the H-Bomb, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barnaby, Frank and Holdstock, Douglas (eds.), The British Nuclear Weapons Programme, London: Cass, 2003Google Scholar; Cathcart, Brian, Test of Greatness: Britain's Struggle for the Atom Bomb, London: Murray, 1994Google Scholar; Clark, Ronald W., The Birth of the Bomb: The Untold Story of Britain's Part in the Weapon That Changed the World, London: Phoenix House, 1961Google Scholar; Gowing, Margaret, Britain and Atomic Energy, 1939–1945, London: Macmillan, 1964Google Scholar; Hoddeson, Lillianet al., Critical Assembly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herran, Néstor, ‘Spreading nucleonics: the Isotope School at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment, 1951–67’, BJHS (2006) 39, pp. 569–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laucht, Christoph, ‘“Los Alamos in a way was a city of foreigners”: German-speaking émigré scientists and the making of the atom bomb at Los Alamos, New Mexico, 1943–1946’, New Mexico Historical Review (2011) 86, pp. 223–250Google Scholar; Spinardi, Graham, ‘Aldermaston and British nuclear weapons development: “testing the Zuckerman Thesis”’, Social Studies of Science (1997) 27, pp. 547–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Szasz, Ferenc M., British Scientists and the Manhattan Project: The Los Alamos Years, New York: St Martin's Press, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Welsh, Ian, ‘The NIMBY syndrome: its significance in the history of the nuclear debate in Britain’, BJHS (1993) 26, pp. 15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lee, Sabine, ‘“In no sense vital and actually not even important”? Reality and perception of Britain's contribution to the development of nuclear weapons’, Contemporary British History (2006) 20, pp. 159–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, Greta, ‘The mushroom-shaped cloud: British scientists’ opposition to nuclear weapons policy, 1945–57’, Annals of Science (1986) 43, pp. 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On Americanization see Krige, John, American Hegemony and the Postwar Reconstruction of Science in Europe, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006Google Scholar; Laucht, Christoph, ‘“An extraordinary achievement of the ‘American Way’:” Hollywood and the Americanization of the making of the atom bomb in Fat Man and Little Boy’, European Journal of American Culture (2009) 28, pp. 41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Willis, Kirk, ‘The origins of British nuclear culture, 1895–1939’, Journal of British Studies (1995) 34, pp. 59–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Kirstein, Peter N., ‘Hiroshima and spinning the atom: America, Britain, and Canada proclaim the Nuclear Age, 6 August 1945’, The Historian (2009) 71, pp. 805–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Hughes, Michael, Conscience and Conflict: Methodism, Peace and War in the Twentieth Century, Peterborough: Epworth, 2008, pp. 140–179Google Scholar; Kirby, Dianne, ‘The Church of England and the Cold War nuclear debate’, Twentieth Century British History (1993) 4, pp. 250–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Willis, Kirk, ‘“God and the atom”: British churchmen and the challenge of nuclear power 1945’, Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies (1997) 29, pp. 422–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Peter Hennessy, ‘Revealed, 30 years after our first nuclear explosion … How Bevin saved Britain's Bomb’, The Times, 30 September 1982, p. 10.
9 Ball, Simon, ‘Military nuclear relations between the United States and Great Britain under the terms of the McMahon Act, 1946–1958’, Historical Journal (1995) 38, pp. 439–454Google Scholar.
10 Margaret Gowing, assisted by Arnold, Lorna, Independence and Deterrence: Britain and Atomic Energy, 1945–1952, London: Macmillan, 1974, p. 184Google Scholar.
11 Gowing, Margaret, Britain and Atomic Energy 1939–1945, London: Macmillan, 1964Google Scholar; Gowing, op. cit. (10); Arnold and Pyne, op. cit. (4); Arnold, Lorna, Windscale 1957: Anatomy of a Nuclear Accident, 2nd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Arnold, Lorna and Smith, Mark, Britain, Australia and the Bomb: The Nuclear Tests and Their Aftermath, 2nd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 See Hennessy, Peter (ed.), Cabinets and the Bomb, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007Google Scholar; Baylis, John and MacMillan, A., ‘The British global strategy paper of 1952’, Journal of Strategic Studies (1993) 16, pp. 200–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clark, Ian, Nuclear Diplomacy and the Special Relationship: Britain's Deterrent and America, 1957–1962, Oxford: Clarendon, 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Croft, Stuart, ‘Continuity and change in British thinking about nuclear weapons’, Political Studies (1994) 42, pp. 228–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Edgerton, David, Warfare State: Britain, 1920–1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006Google Scholar; Epstein, Leon D., ‘The Nuclear deterrent and the British election of 1964’, Journal of British Studies (1966) 5, pp. 139–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Freedman, Lawrence, Britain and Nuclear Weapons, London: Macmillan, 1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grant, Matthew (ed.), The British Way in Cold Warfare, London: Continuum, 2008Google Scholar; Maguire, Richard, ‘Scientific dissent amid the United Kingdom government's nuclear weapons programme’, History Workshop Journal (2007) 63, pp. 113–135Google Scholar; Navias, Martin, Nuclear Weapons and British Strategic Planning, 1955–1958, Oxford: Clarendon, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar; O'Neill, Robert, ‘Britain and the future of nuclear weapons’, International Affairs (1995) 71, pp. 747–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Reynolds, David, Britannia Overruled: British Policy and World Power in the 20th Century, London: Longman, 1991Google Scholar.
13 For recent work published on the British nuclear weapons programme as part of an AHRC-funded project based in the Mountbatten Centre for International Studies, Southampton, see Walker, John R., British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban, 1954–1973: Britain, the United States, Weapons Policies and Nuclear Testing: Tensions and Contradictions, Farnham: Ashgate, 2010Google Scholar; Moore, Richard, Nuclear Illusion, Nuclear Reality: Britain, the United States and Nuclear Weapons, 1958–1964, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012Google Scholar; Stoddart, Kristan, Losing an Empire and Finding a Role: Britain, the USA, NATO and Nuclear Weapons, 1964–70, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Baylis, John, Anglo-American Defence Relations 1939–1984: The Special Relationship, 2nd edn, London: Macmillan, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Baylis, , Ambiguity and Deterrence: British Nuclear Strategy, 1945–1964, Oxford: Clarendon, 1994Google Scholar; Bourantonis, Dimitris and Johnson, Edward, ‘Anglo-American diplomacy and the introduction of the atomic energy issue in the United Nations: discord and cooperation in 1945’, Contemporary British History (2004) 18, pp. 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goodman, Michael S., Spying on the Nuclear Bear: Anglo-American Intelligence and the Soviet Bomb, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007Google Scholar; Jones, Matthew, ‘Great Britain, the United States, and consultation over use of the atomic bomb, 1950–1954’, Historical Journal (2011) 54, pp. 797–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kelly, Saul, ‘No ordinary Foreign Office official: Sir Roger Makins and Anglo-American atomic relations, 1945–55’, Contemporary British History (2000) 14, pp. 107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Paul, Septimus H., Nuclear Rivals: Anglo-American Atomic Relations, 1941–1952, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2000Google Scholar; Schrafstetter, Susanna, ‘“Loquacious … and pointless as ever?” Britain, the United States and the United Nations negotiations on international control of nuclear energy 1945–48’, Contemporary British History (2002) 16, pp. 87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Simpson, John, The Independent Nuclear State: The United States, Britain and the Military Atom, London: Macmillan, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Twigge, Stephen and Scott, Len, Planning Armageddon: Britain, the United States and the Command of Western Nuclear Forces, 1945–1964, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic, 2000Google Scholar; Mackby, Jenifer and Cornish, Paul, US–UK Nuclear Cooperation After 50 Years, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies Press, 2008Google Scholar; Priest, Andrew, ‘In American hands: Britain, the United States and the Polaris nuclear project, 1962–1968’, Contemporary British History (2005) 19, pp. 353–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Ball, Simon, ‘Harold Macmillan and the politics of defence: the market for strategic ideas during the Sandys era revisited’, Twentieth Century British History (1995) 6, pp. 78–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moore, Richard, The Royal Navy and Nuclear Weapons, London: Cass, 2001Google Scholar; Priest, op. cit. (13); Quinlan, Michael, Thinking about Nuclear Weapons: Principles, Problems, Prospects, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Redford, Duncan, ‘The “hallmark of a first-class navy”: the nuclear-powered submarine in the Royal Navy 1960–77’, Contemporary British History (2009) 23, pp. 181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 Aldrich, Richard J., The Hidden Hand: Britain, America and Cold War Secret Intelligence, London: Murray, 2001Google Scholar; Goodman, op. cit. (13); Goodman, , ‘The grandfather of the hydrogen bomb? Anglo-American intelligence and Klaus Fuchs’, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences (2003) 34, pp. 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goodman, , ‘Who is trying to keep what secret from whom and why?’, Journal of Cold War Studies (2005) 7, pp. 124–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Cocroft, Wayne D. and Thomas, Roger J.C., Cold War: Building for Nuclear Confrontation 1946–1989, Swindon: English Heritage, 2003Google Scholar; Grant, op. cit. (12); Hennessy, Peter, The Secret State: Preparing for the Worst 1945–2010, 2nd edn, London: Penguin, 2010Google Scholar.
17 Jamieson, Brian P., ‘Britain's national deterrent: Scotland's answer to the cycle of unemployment?’, Contemporary British History (2007) 21, pp. 449–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 Sean Johnston, F., The Neutron's Children: Nuclear Engineers and the Shaping of Identity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Jon Agar, ‘Sacrificial Experts? Science, senescence and saving the British nuclear project’, History of Science (forthcoming), examines scientists and engineers as volunteers after Chernobyl.
19 Forgan, Sophie, ‘Atoms in wonderland’, History and Technology (2003) 19, pp. 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Campbell, Duncan, War Plan UK: The Truth about Civil Defence in Britain, London: Burnett, 1982Google Scholar; Grant, Matthew, ‘Home defence and the Sandys White Paper, 1957’, Journal of Strategic Studies (2008) 31, pp. 925–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grant, Matthew, After the Bomb: Civil Defence and Nuclear War in Cold War Britain, 1945–68, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grant, , ‘“Civil defence gives meaning to your leisure”: citizenship, participation, and cultural change in Cold War recruitment propaganda, 1949–54’, Twentieth Century British History (2010) 22, pp. 52–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hughes, Jeff, ‘The Strath Report: Britain confronts the H-bomb, 1954–1955’, History and Technology (2003) 19, pp. 257–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, Melissa, ‘Architects of Armageddon: the Home Office Scientific Advisers’ Branch and civil defence in Britain, 1945–68’, BJHS (2010) 43, pp. 149–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, , ‘“What to do if it happens”: planners, pamphlets and propaganda in the age of the H-bomb’, Endeavour (2009) 33, pp. 60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 Carpenter, Charles A., Dramatists and the Bomb: American and British Playwrights Confront the Nuclear Age, 1945–1964, London: Greenwood Press, 1999Google Scholar; Chapman, James, ‘The BBC and the censorship of The War Game (1965)’, Journal of Contemporary History (2006) 41, pp. 75–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chapman, , ‘The War Game controversy – again’, Journal of Contemporary History (2008) 43, pp. 105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Luckhurst, Roger, Science Fiction, Cambridge: Polity, 2005Google Scholar; Shaw, Tony, British Cinema and the Cold War: The State, Propaganda and Consensus, London: I.B. Tauris, 2001Google Scholar; Shaw, Tony, ‘The BBC, the state and Cold War culture: the case of television's The War Game (1965)’, English Historical Review (2006) 121, pp. 351–384Google Scholar; Wayne, Mike, ‘Failing the public: the BBC, The War Game and revisionist history, a reply to James Chapman’, Journal of Contemporary History (2007) 42, pp. 627–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar; David Seed, ‘TV docudrama and the nuclear subject: The War Game, The Day After and Threads’, in John R. Cook and Peter Wright (eds.), British Science Fiction Television: A Hitchhiker's Guide, London: I.B. Tauris, 2006, pp. 154–173.
22 Hornsey, Richard, ‘“Everything is made of atoms”: the reprogramming of space and time in post-war London’, Journal of Historical Geography (2008) 34, pp. 94–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 Welsh, Ian, Mobilising Modernity: The Nuclear Moment, London: Routledge, 2003Google Scholar.
24 Gill, David James, ‘Ministers, markets and missiles: the British government, the European Economic Community and the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, 1964–68’, Diplomacy and Statecraft (2010) 21, pp. 451–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Helen Parr, ‘Transformation and tradition: Anglo-French nuclear cooperation and Britain's policy towards the European Community’, in Grant, op. cit. (12), pp. 87–103.
25 See Davies, Tracy, Stages of Emergency: Cold War Nuclear Civil Defense, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nehring, Holger, ‘National internationalists: British and West German protests against nuclear weapons, the politics of transnational communications and the social history of the Cold War, 1957–1964’, Contemporary European History (2005) 14, pp. 559–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mark B. Smith, ‘Peaceful coexistence at all costs: Cold War exchanges between Britain and the Soviet Union in 1956’, Cold War History (forthcoming).
26 Crawford, John, ‘“A political H-bomb”: New Zealand and the British thermonuclear weapon test of 1957–58’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History (1998) 26, pp. 127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cross, Roger, ‘British nuclear tests and the indigenous people of Australia’, in Holdstock, Douglas and Barnaby, Frank (eds.), The British Nuclear Weapons Programme 1952–2002, London: Cass, 2003, pp. 76–90Google Scholar; Smith, Joan, Clouds of Deceit: The Deadly Legacy of Britain's Bomb Tests, London: Faber, 1985Google Scholar; Arnold and Smith, op. cit. (11).
27 See www.sellafieldstories.org.uk; Davies, Hunter (ed.), Sellafield Stories: Life with Britain's First Nuclear Plant, London: Constable, 2012Google Scholar; Robinson, Derek, Just Testing, London: Collins Harvill, 1985Google Scholar.
28 Jasanoff, Sheila and Kim, Sang-Hyun, ‘Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea’, Minerva (2009) 47, pp. 119–146, 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
29 For critical analyses of the concept of ‘Britishness’ see Colley, Linda, Britons: Forging the Nation 1707–1837, new edn, London: Pimlico, 2003Google Scholar; Richards, Jeffrey, Films and British National Identity: From Dickens to ‘Dad's Army’, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997Google Scholar; Rose, Sonya O., Which People's War? National Identity and Citizenship in Wartime Britain 1939–1945, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003Google Scholar.
30 ‘The future of the United Kingdom's nuclear deterrent’, Cm. 6994, London: HMSO, 2006; ‘Meeting the energy challenge: a White Paper on Nuclear Energy, January 2008’, Cm. 7296 , London: HMSO, 2008.
31 Hecht, Gabrielle, The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998, p. 15Google Scholar.
32 Gowing, op. cit. (10), passim.
33 Arnold, op. cit. (11), pp. xxi–xxii; Central Office of Information, Nuclear Energy in Britain, 2nd edn, London: HMSO, 1960, 9, pp. 11–13; Josephson, Paul, Red Atom: Russia's Nuclear Power Program from Stalin to Today, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000, p. 2Google Scholar.
34 Boyer, Paul S., By the Bomb's Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age, New York: Pantheon, 1985Google Scholar, repr. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994.
35 See, for example, Weart, Spencer R., Nuclear Fear: A History of Images, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988Google Scholar; revised version repr. as The Rise of Nuclear Fear, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012; Winkler, Allan M., Life under a Cloud: American Anxiety about the Atom, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993Google Scholar, repr. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1999; Henriksen, Margot A., Dr. Strangelove's America: Society and Culture in the Atomic Age, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997Google Scholar; Zeman, Scott C. and Amundson, Michael A., eds., Atomic Culture: How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 2004Google Scholar; Mariner, Rosemary B. and Piehler, G. Kurt (eds.), The Atomic Bomb and American Society: New Perspectives, Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 2009Google Scholar; and Jacobs, Robert A., The Dragon's Tail: Americans Face the Atomic Age, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2010Google Scholar.
36 Boyer, op. cit. (34), pp. xix–xx.
37 Hales, Peter B., ‘The atomic sublime’, American Studies (1991) 32, pp. 5–31, 28Google Scholar. See also Rosenthal, Peggy, ‘The nuclear mushroom cloud as cultural image’, American Literary History (1991) 3, pp. 63–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
38 Norman Cousins, ‘Modern Man is obsolete’, Saturday Review of Literature, 18 August 1945, p. 5. See also Cousins, Modern Man Is Obsolete, New York: Viking Press, 1945, repr. London: Falcon Press, 1946.
39 Deren, Maya, An Anagram of Ideas on Art, Form and Film, Yonkers: Alicat Book Shop Press, 1946, p. 10Google Scholar, repr. in Bill Nichols (ed.), Maya Deren and the American Avant-Garde, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001, 267–322. We thank Dr Henning Engelke for pointing us towards this source.
40 Canaday, John, The Nuclear Muse: Literature, Physics, and the First Atomic Bombs, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2000, p. 24Google Scholar.
41 Messmer, Michael W., ‘Nuclear culture, nuclear criticism’, Minnesota Review (1988) 30, pp. 161–180, 161Google Scholar. Also see Messmer, , ‘“Thinking it through completely”: the interpretation of nuclear culture’, Centennial Review (1988) 34, pp. 397–413Google Scholar.
42 Scott Zeman and Michael Amundson, ‘Introduction’, in Zeman and Amundson, op. cit. (35), pp. 1–9, 2.
43 Willis, op. cit. (5), p. 60.
44 Laucht, Elemental Germans, op. cit. (4), p. 5.
45 Nehring, Holger, ‘The British and West German protests against nuclear weapons and the cultures of the Cold War’, Contemporary British History (2005) 19, pp. 223–241, 224CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
46 Jutta Weldes, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson and Raymond Duvall, ‘Introduction: constructing insecurity’, in Weldes et al., Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger, Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1999, pp. 1–33, 2.
47 Masco, Joseph, ‘“Survival is your business”: engineering ruins and affect in nuclear America’, Cultural Anthropology (2008) 23, pp. 361–398, 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
48 Arnold, op. cit. (11); Wynne, Brian, Rationality and Ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain, Chalfont St Giles: British Society for the History of Science, 1982Google Scholar.
49 O'Driscoll, Mervyn, ‘Missing the nuclear boat? British policy and French military nuclear ambitions during the EURATOM Foundation Negotiations, 1955–56’, Diplomacy and Statecraft (1998) 9, pp. 135–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Krige, John, ‘The peaceful atom as political weapon: Euratom and American foreign policy in the late 1950s’, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences (2008) 38, pp. 5–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
50 Schrafstetter, Susanna and Twigge, Stephen, ‘Spinning in Europe: Britain, West Germany and the Netherlands – uranium enrichment and the development of the gas centrifuge, 1964–1970’, Contemporary European History (2002) 11, pp. 253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Twigge, Stephen, ‘A baffling experience: technology transfer, Anglo-American nuclear relations, and the development of the gas centrifuge, 1964–1970’, History and Technology (2003) 19, pp. 151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
51 Wynne, Brian, ‘Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science’, Public Understanding of Science (1992) 1, pp. 281–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
52 Hecht, op. cit. (31); Radkau, Joachim, Aufstieg und Krise der deutschen Atomwirtschaft 1945–1975: Verdrängte Alternativen in der Kerntechnik und der Ursprung der nuklearen Kontroverse, Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1982Google Scholar.
53 Nye, David, Narratives and Space: Technology and the Construction of American Culture, New York: Columbia University Press, 1997, pp. 81–83Google Scholar.
54 Hennessy, op. cit. (16).
55 Nye, David, American Technological Sublime, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994, p. 231Google Scholar.
56 Josephson op. cit. (33), pp. 299–300.
57 Nye, op. cit. (55), p. 231.
58 Wills, Garry, Bomb Power: The Modern Presidency and the National Security State, New York: Penguin Press, 2010, p. 1Google Scholar.
59 Vincent, David, The Culture of Secrecy: Britain, 1832–1998, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 9–18, 194–210Google Scholar.
60 Gowing, op. cit. (10), pp. 126–127.
61 Wilkinson, Nicholas, Secrecy and the Media: The Official History of the United Kingdom's D-Notice System, London: Routledge, 2009Google Scholar.
62 Wittner, Lawrence S., Resisting the Bomb, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997Google Scholar; Wittner, , ‘Gender roles and nuclear disarmament activism, 1954–1965’, Gender and History (2000) 12, pp. 197–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Young, Alison, Femininity in Dissent, London: Routledge, 1990Google Scholar; Phythian, Mark, ‘CND's Cold War’, Contemporary British History (2001) 15, pp. 133–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nehring, op. cit. (45).
63 Badash, Lawrence, A Nuclear Winter's Tale: Science and Politics in the 1980s, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hamblin, Jacob D., Poison in the Well: Radioactive Waste in the Oceans at the Dawn of the Nuclear Age, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2008Google Scholar; McNeill, J.R. and Unger, Corinna R. (eds.), Environmental Histories of the Cold War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wynne, op. cit. (51).