Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:12:10.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The history of transdisciplinary race classification: methods, politics and institutions, 1840s–1940s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

RICHARD MCMAHON
RICHARD MCMAHON*
Affiliation:
School of Social, Historical and Literary Studies, University of Portsmouth, UK. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A recently blossoming historiographical literature recognizes that physical anthropologists allied with scholars of diverse aspects of society and history to racially classify European peoples over a period of about a hundred years. They created three successive race classification coalitions – ethnology, from around 1840; anthropology, from the 1850s; and interwar raciology – each of which successively disintegrated. The present genealogical study argues that representing these coalitions as ‘transdisciplinary’ can enrich our understanding of challenges to disciplinary specialization. This is especially the case for the less well-studied nineteenth century, when disciplines and challenges to disciplinary specialization were both gradually emerging. Like Marxism or structuralism, race classification was a holistic interpretive framework, which, at its most ambitious, aimed to structure the human sciences as a whole. It resisted the organization of academia and knowledge into disciplines with separate organizational institutions and research practices. However, the ‘transdisciplinarity’ of this nationalistic project also bridged emerging borderlines between science and politics. I ascribe race classification's simultaneous longevity and instability to its complex and intricately entwined processes of political and interdisciplinary coalition building. Race classification's politically useful conclusions helped secure public support for institutionalizing the coalition's component disciplines. Institutionalization in turn stimulated disciplines to professionalize. They emphasized disciplinary boundaries and insisted on apolitical science, thus ultimately undermining the ‘transdisciplinary’ project.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 41 - 67
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rüegg, Walter, ‘Themes’, in Rüegg, (ed.), A History of the University in Europe, vol. 3, Universities in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries (1800–1945), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 3–31, 9Google Scholar; Christophe Charle, ‘Patterns’, in ibid., pp. 33–80, 59; Wagner, Peter, The Twentieth Century: The Century of the Social Sciences?, Paris: ISSC, 1999, pp. 16–41, 19Google Scholar.

2 Wagner, op. cit. (1).

3 William Wilde, ‘The early races of mankind in Ireland’, Irish Builder, 1 September, 15 September, 1 October 1874, 245–246, 258–259, 273–274, 245; Périer, J.A.N., Bertillon, Alphonse and Lagneau, Gustave, ‘Notice-questionnaire sur l'anthropologie de la France’, Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1861) 2, pp. 327–420, 327–328, 338Google Scholar.

4 Manias, Chris, Race, Science and the Nation: Reconstructing the Ancient Past in Britain, France and Germany, 1800–1914, New York: Routledge, 2013, pp. 10–11 Google Scholar; Reynaud-Paligot, Carole, De l'identité nationale: Science, race et politique en Europe et aux Etats-Unis XIXe–XXe siècle, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2011, p. 7 Google Scholar; McMahon, Richard, The Races of Europe: Construction of National Identities in the Social Sciences 1839–1939, Houndmills: Palgrave, 2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Lawrence, Roderick J., ‘Advances in transdisciplinarity: epistemologies, methodologies and processes’, Futures (2015) 65, pp. 1–9, 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bernstein, Jay Hillel, ‘Transdisciplinarity: a review of its origins, development, and current issues’, Journal of Research Practice (2015) 11(1), pp. 1–20, 5Google Scholar.

6 Choi, B.C. and Pak, A.W., ‘Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness’, Clinical and Investigative Medicine (2006) 29(6), pp. 351–364, 355Google ScholarPubMed; Osborne, P., ‘Problematizing disciplinarity: transdisciplinary problematics’, Theory, Culture & Society (2015) 32(5–6), pp. 3–35, 14–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Klein, Julie Thompson, ‘Discourses of transdisciplinarity: looking back to the future’, Futures (2015) 63, pp. 68–74, 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Klein, J.T., Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1990, p. 23 Google Scholar; Osborne, op. cit. (6), p. 5.

8 Osborne, op. cit. (6), pp. 4–5; Heilbron, J. and Gingras, Y., ‘La résilience des disciplines’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales (2016) 5, pp. 4–9, 5Google Scholar.

9 Agar, Jon, Science in the 20th Century and Beyond, Cambridge: Polity, 2012, pp. 170–172 Google Scholar.

10 Osborne, op. cit. (6), p. 3; Stichweh, Rudolf, ‘The sociology of scientific disciplines: on the genesis and stability of the disciplinary structure of modern science’, Science in Context (1992) 5(1), pp. 3–15, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Heilbron, J., Guilhot, N. and Jeanpierre, L., ‘Toward a transnational history of the social sciences’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences (2008) 44(2), pp. 146–160, 149–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Heilbron, W.J., ‘A regime of disciplines: toward a historical sociology of disciplinary knowledge’, in Camic, C. and Joas, H. (eds.), The Dialogical Turn: New Roles for Sociology in the Postdisciplinary Age, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, pp. 23–42, 25, 31–32Google Scholar; Valenza, R., Literature, Language, and the Rise of the Intellectual Disciplines in Britain, 1680–1820, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, p. 5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Heilbron and Gingras, op. cit. (8), pp. 5, 8; Charle, op. cit. (1), p. 59; Wagner, Peter, A History and Theory of the Social Sciences: Not All That Is Solid Melts into Air, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2001, pp. 1–2 Google Scholar; Osborne, op. cit. (6), p. 3.

13 Chapoulie, J.M., ‘Un cadre d'analyse pour l'histoire des sciences sociales’, Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines (2005) 2, pp. 99–126, 105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Heilbron and Gingras, op. cit. (8), p. 8.

14 Chris Manias, op. cit. (4), pp. 5–6.

15 Heilbron, op. cit. (12), pp. 31–32.

16 Bowler, Peter, The Invention of Progress: The Victorians and the Past, Oxford: Blackwell, 1989, p. viii Google Scholar.

17 Messer-Davidow, E., Shumway, D.R. and Sylvan, D., ‘Introduction: disciplinary ways of knowing’, in Messer-Davidow, Shumway and Sylvan (eds.), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1993, pp. 1–21, 4Google Scholar. The term is Foucault's, but I do not adopt the full suite of implications that attend his perspective.

18 Laurent Mucchielli, ‘Durkheimiens dans le contexte “fin de siècle” (1885–1902)’ (1997), at http://laurent.mucchielli.free.fr/raciologie.htm, accessed 25 May 2014.

19 Messer-Davidow, Shumway and Sylvan, ‘Introduction’, op. cit. (17), p. 4.

20 Adler-Nissen, R. and Kropp, K., ‘A sociology of knowledge approach to European integration: four analytical principles’, Journal of European Integration (2015) 37(2), pp. 155–173, 156, 160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Lawrence, op. cit. (5), p. 4.

22 Osborne, op. cit. (6), pp. 10–11.

23 Cited in Odom, Herbert H., ‘Generalizations on race in nineteenth-century physical anthropology’, Isis (1967) 58(1), pp. 4–18, 9Google ScholarPubMed.

24 Avery, J. Gould, ‘Civilisation; with especial reference to the so-called Celtic inhabitants of Ireland’, Journal of the Anthropological Society of London (1869) 7, pp. ccxxi–ccxxxvii, ccxxivCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Bunzl, Matti and Penny, H. Glenn, ‘Introduction: rethinking German anthropology, colonialism, and race’, in Penny, H. Glenn and Bunzl, Matti (eds.), Worldly Provincialism: German Anthropology in the Age of Empire, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003, pp. 1–30, 5Google Scholar.

26 Manias, op. cit. (4), p. 4–5. Reynaud-Paligot, op. cit. (5), p. 9.

27 McMahon, op. cit. (4), pp. 49–50.

28 Messer-Davidow, Shumway and Sylvan, ‘Introduction’, op. cit. (17), p. 7.

29 McMahon, op. cit. (4), pp. 20–23.

30 Stocking, George W. Jr, The Ethnographers’ Magic and Other Essays in the History of Anthropology, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1992, p. 350 Google Scholar.

31 Augstein, Hannah Franziska, James Cowles Prichard's Anthropology: Remaking the Science of Man in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999, p. 231 Google Scholar. Staum, Martin S., Labeling People: French Scholars on Society, Race, and Empire, 1815–1848, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2003, pp: 132–133 Google Scholar; Blanckaert, Claude, ‘On the origins of French ethnology: William Edwards and the doctrine of race’, in Stocking, George W. Jr (ed.), Bodies, Bones, Behaviour: Essays on Biological Anthropology, Madison and London: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988, pp. 18–55, 18–19Google Scholar.

32 Blanckaert, op. cit. (31), pp. 38–39, 46.

33 Blanckaert, op. cit. (31), pp. 27–28; McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 25.

34 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 18.

35 Edwards, William, ‘Des caractères physiologiques des races humaines considérés dans leur rapports avec l'histoire: lettre à M. Amédée Thierry, auteur de l'histoire des Gaulois’, Mémoires da la Société ethnologique (1841 [1829]) 1, pp. 1–108, 2Google Scholar; Blanckaert, op. cit. (31), p. 19.

36 Dias, Nélia, Le Musée d'ethnographie du Trocadéro (1878–1908): Anthropologie et muséologie en France, Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 1991, p. 19 Google Scholar.

37 Massin, Benoit, ‘From Virchow to Fischer: physical anthropology and “modern race theories” in Wilhelmine Germany’, in Stocking, George W. Jr (ed.), Volksgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996, pp. 79–154, 120–121Google Scholar.

38 Blanckaert, op. cit. (31), p. 26; Edwards, op. cit. (35), pp. 82–83.

39 Gould, Stephen Jay, The Mismeasure of Man, New York: Norton, 1981, p. 25 Google Scholar; Blanckaert, op. cit. (31), p. 38.

40 Edwards, op. cit. (35), pp. 37–39.

41 Stocking, op. cit. (30), p. 350.

42 Stocking, George W. Jr, Victorian Anthropology, New York: Free Press, 1991, p. 244 Google Scholar; Blanckaert, Claude, ‘L'indice céphalique et l'ethnogénie européenne: A. Retzius, P. Broca, F. Pruner-Bey (1840–1870)’, Bulletins et mémoires de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1989), n.s. 1(3–4), pp. 165–202, 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Edwards, op. cit. (35), pp. 82–83.

43 Blanckaert, op. cit. (31), pp. 41, 44.

44 Hecht, Jennifer Michael, The End of the Soul: Scientific Modernity, Atheism, and Anthropology in France, New York: Columbia University Press, 2003, p. 56 Google Scholar.

45 Hunt, James, ‘The President's Address’, Journal of the Anthropological Society of London (1864) 2, pp. lxxx–xcv, xciiCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stocking, op. cit. (42), p. xcii.

46 Stocking, op. cit. (42), pp. 247–248.

47 Blanckaert, op. cit. (42), p. 46; McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 25.

48 E.g. Thurnham, John, ‘Sur les deux principales formes des anciens crânes Bretons et gaulois’, Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1864) 5, pp. 395–421, 402CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Wilde, William R., The Beauties of the Boyne and Its Tributary, the Blackwater, Dublin: James McGlashan, 1849, p. 230 Google Scholar.

50 Dias, Nélia, ‘Séries de crânes et armée de squelettes: les collections anthropologiques en France dans la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle’, Bulletins et memoires de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1989) n.s. 1(3–4), pp. 203–230, 205–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Blanckaert, op. cit. (42), pp. 166–167; Retzius, Gustaf, ‘The so-called north European race of mankind. A review of, and views on, the development of some anthropological questions’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (1909) 39(2), pp. 277–313, 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Stocking, op. cit. (42), p. 248; Vallois, H., ‘Zum hundertjährigen Bestehen der Societe d'Anthopologie de Paris (1859–1959)’, Anthropologische Anzeiger (1959) 23(1), pp. 75–81, 77Google Scholar.

53 Hunt, op. cit. (45), p. xcii; Wilde, op. cit. (3), p. 245; Quine, Maria Sophia, ‘Making Italians: Aryanism and anthropology in Italy during the Risorgimento’, in Turda, M. (ed.), Crafting Humans: From Genesis to Eugenics and Beyond, Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2013, pp. 127–152, 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Stocking, op. cit. (42), p. 248; Mucchielli, op. cit. (18), p. 2; Dias, op. cit. (36), p. 22.

55 Ripley, William Z., A Selected Bibliography of the Anthropology and Ethnology of Europe, Boston: Public Library, 1899, pp. vii–viii Google Scholar.

56 Stocking, op. cit. (42), p. 249; Mucchielli, op. cit. (18), p. 2.

57 Massin, op. cit. (37), p. 126; von Eickstedt, Egon Freiherr, Die Forschung am Menschen, Teil 1, Geschichte und Methoden der Anthropologie, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1940, 156 Google Scholar; Taylor, E.B., ‘President's Address’, Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (1880) 9, pp. 443–458, 448Google Scholar.

58 MacCurdy, G.G., ‘Extent of instruction in anthropology in Europe and the United States’, Science (1899) 10, pp. 910–917, 915–916CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Făcăoaru, Iordache, ‘Antropologia în ţările de cultură’, Buletinul Eugenic şi Biopolitic (1938) 9(7–8), pp. 207–218, 212, 216Google Scholar.

59 Stocking, op. cit. (42), pp. 249–254.

60 Robert Proctor, ‘From Anthropologie to Rassenkunde in the German anthropological tradition’, in Stocking, op. cit. (31), , pp. 138–179, 141.

61 Day, John V., ‘Aryanism’, in Spencer, Frank (ed.), History of Physical Anthropology: An Encyclopedia, vol. 1, New York: Garland, 1997, pp. 109–112, 110Google Scholar; Proctor, op. cit. (60), p. 141; Vallois, op. cit. (52), p. 78.

62 Evans, Andrew D., Anthropology at War: World War I and the Science of Race in Germany, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010, p. 27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Spencer, Frank, ‘Broca, Paul (Pierre) (1824–1880)’, in Spencer (ed.), History of Physical Anthropology: An Encyclopedia, New York: Garland, 1997, pp. 221–222, 221Google Scholar.

64 Vallois, op. cit. (52), p. 78.

65 Bonté, Louis-Achille, ‘Sur les Celtes’, Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1864) 5, pp. 624–633, 629CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Tristram, Hildegard L.C., ‘Celtic linguistic taxonomy in the nineteenth century’, in Brown, Terrence (ed.), Celticism, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1996, pp. 35–60, 45Google Scholar; de Raille, Julien Girard, ‘De la race celtique’, Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1864) 5, pp. 550–556, 552Google Scholar.

67 Blanckaert, op. cit. (42), pp. 172–173, 180–182; Orsucci, Andrea, ‘Ariani, indogermani, stirpi mediterranee: aspetti del dibattito sulle razze europee (1870–1914)’, Cromohs (1998) 3 Google Scholar, at www.unifi.it/riviste/cromohs, p. 9.

68 Périer, J.A.N., ‘Que les vrais Celtes sont les vrais Galois’, Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1864) 5, pp. 590–624, 621CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Bonté, op. cit. (65), pp. 630–631.

70 von Hölder, H., Zusammenstellung der in Württemberg vorkommenden Schädelformen, Stuttgart: Schweizerbart, 1876, pp. 6, 19Google Scholar; Périer, op. cit. (68), pp. 617.

71 Ripley, William, The Races of Europe: A Sociological Study, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1900, p. 125 Google Scholar.

72 Pruner-Bey, Franz, ‘Sur les deux principales formes des anciens crânes bretons et gaulois’, Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1864) 5, pp. 405–419, 412–415Google Scholar.

73 Hölder, op. cit. (70), p. 18.

74 Pruner-Bey, Franz, ‘Sur la question Celtique’, Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1864) 5, pp. 657–679, 666–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Myres, John L., ‘Presidential Address. Anthropology: national and international’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (1930) 60, pp. 17–45, 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goodrum, Matthew R., ‘The beginnings of human palaeontology: prehistory, craniometry and the “fossil human races”’, BJHS (2016) 49(3), pp. 387–409, 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 Blanckaert, op. cit. (42), pp. 187, 189; Girard de Raille, op. cit. (66), pp. 568–569.

77 Pruner-Bey, op. cit. (74), 664.

78 Hovelacque, Abel, ‘Les Celtes de la linguistique’, Revue d'anthropologie (1873) 2, pp. 187–199, 499Google Scholar; Bertrand, Alexandre, ‘Sur les origines européennes’, Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1864) 5, pp. 302–318, 367–383, 370CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79 Périer, op. cit. (68), pp. 620–621.

80 McMahon, op. cit. (4), pp. 50–51.

81 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 53.

82 Sklenář, Karel, Archaelogy in Central Europe: The First 500 Years, Leicester: Leiecster University Press, 1983, p. 134 Google Scholar.

83 Vallois, op. cit. (52), pp. 77–79; Pogliano, Claudio, L'ossessione della razza: antropologia e genetica nel xx secolo, Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 2005, pp. 405, 415Google Scholar.

84 Stocking, op. cit. (30), p. 353.

85 Sklenář, op. cit. (82), p. 135–138; Puschner, Uwe, ‘Die Germanenideologie im Kontext der völkischen Weltanschauung’, Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft (2001) 4, pp. 85–97, 93Google Scholar.

86 Myres, John L., ‘Presidential Address: anthropology, pure and applied’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (1931) 61, pp. xxv–xli, xxviCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Comas, Juan, Historia y Bibliografia de los Congresos Internacionales de Ciencias Antropologicas: 1865–1954, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, 1956, p. 47 Google Scholar.

87 Fee, Elizabeth, ‘Nineteenth-century craniology: the study of the female skull’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine (1979) 53(3), pp. 415–433, 419, 426–427Google Scholar; Massin, op. cit. (37), p. 106.

88 Ripley, op. cit. (71), p. 34.

89 Massin, op. cit. (37), pp. 106, 110–111; Retzius, op. cit. (51), p. 278; Quine, op. cit. (53), ‘Making Italians’, p. 147.

90 Keane, Augustus Henry, Ethnology, 2nd revised edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1896, p. 151 Google ScholarPubMed; Pogliano, op. cit. (83), p. 395; de Quatrefages, Armand, Histoire générale des races humaines: Introduction à l’étude des races humaines, Paris: Hennuyer, 1889, p. 488 Google Scholar.

91 Pöch, Rudolf, ‘Bericht über die von der Wiener Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in den k. u. k. Kriegsgefangenenlagern veranlassten Studien’, Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft Wien (1917) 47, pp. 77–100, 78–79Google Scholar; Dias, op. cit. (50), pp. 221–222.

92 Morant, G.M., ‘Racial theories and international relations’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (1939) 69(2), pp. 151–162, 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pöch, op. cit. (91), pp. 78–79.

93 ‘Types fondamentaux et types secondaires en Europe’, Institut International d'Anthropologie: IIe session: Prague 14–21 Septembre 1924, Paris: Nourry, 1926, pp. 145–150, 149Google Scholar.

94 Lutzhöft, Hans-Jürgen, Der Nordische Gedanke in Deutschland 1920–1940, Stuttgart: Klett, 1971, pp. 96, 98Google Scholar.

95 Talko-Hryncewicz, Julian, ‘Słów pare ze stanowiska antropologji w kwestii pochodzenia Slowian’, Wisła (1902) 16, pp. 754–761, 761Google Scholar.

96 Kollmann, Julius, ‘Beitrag zu einer Kraniologie der europäischen Völker’, Archiv für Anthropologie (1880) 13, pp. 79–122 Google Scholar, Tafeln II–IV, (1881) 14, pp. 1–40, Tafeln I–II, 12.

97 Massin, op. cit. (37), p. 109–110.

98 Myres, op. cit. (75), pp. 19–21.

99 von Eickstedt, Egon Freiherr, ‘Geschichte der anthropologische Namengabung und Klassifikation (unter Betonung von Sudasien)’, Zeitschrift für Rassenkunde (1937) 5, pp. 220–282 Google Scholar, (1937) 6, pp. 36–96, 87–88.

100 Sklenář, op. cit. (82), pp. 82–85.

101 Hammond, Michael, ‘Anthropology as a weapon of social combat in late-nineteenth-century France’, Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences (1980) 16, pp. 118–132, 118Google Scholar.

102 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 31.

103 McMahon, op. cit. (4).

104 Myres, op. cit. (86), p. xxvi; Comas, op. cit. (86), p. 47.

105 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 28.

106 Barkan, Elazar, The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the World Wars, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, p. 19 Google Scholar.

107 Massin, op. cit. (37), pp. 128.

108 Massin, op. cit. (37), pp. 84–85; Proctor, op. cit. (60), p. 154.

109 Myres, op. cit. (75), p. 40; Sklenář, op. cit. (82), pp. 105, 134–135.

110 MacCurdy, op. cit. (58), p. 916; Făcăoaru, op. cit. (58), pp. 210–216.

111 Eickstedt, op. cit. (99), p. 88; Vallois, op. cit. (52), p. 77.

112 Zimmerman, Andrew, Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2001, pp. 38, 112–113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

113 MacLoughlin, James L., ‘The race-type in Celtic literature’, New Ireland Review (1896) 5(2), pp. 81–94 Google Scholar; (1896) 6(1), pp. 26–38, 26.

114 MacMaster, Neil, Racism in Europe, Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001, pp. 8–9 Google Scholar.

115 Eickstedt, op. cit. (99), pp. 42, 82; Knox, Robert, The Races of Men: A Philosophical Enquiry into the Influence of Race over the Destinies of Nations: A Fragment, London: Renshaw, 1850, p. 15 Google Scholar; Arnold, Matthew, Lectures and Essays in Criticism, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962, pp. 298–299 Google Scholar.

116 Manias, op. cit. (4), p. 111.

117 Todorov, Tzvetan, On Human Diversity: Nationalism, Racism, and Exoticism in French Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993, pp. 106–109, 114–118, 145, 156–159Google Scholar.

118 Mucchielli, op. cit. (18), pp. 8–12, 18–22; Pogliano, op. cit. (83), p. 446; Mogilner, Marina, Homo Imperii: A History of Physical Anthropology in Russia, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2013, pp. 169–170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; MacMaster, op. cit. (114), p. 44.

119 Manias, op. cit. (4), p. 175.

120 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 61.

121 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 58.

122 Blanckaert, op. cit. (31), p. 48; Mogilner, op. cit. (118), pp. 59–60.

123 Berger, Stefan and Miller, Alexei (eds), Nationalizing Empires, Budapest: Central European University Press, 2015 Google Scholar.

124 Făcăoaru, op. cit. (58), pp. 210–211, 215; Spencer, Frank, ‘The rise of academic physical anthropology in the United States (1880–1980): a historical overview’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology (1981) 56(4), pp. 353–364, 355CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Myres, op. cit. (86), pp. xxviii–xxix.

125 Bunzl and Penny, op. cit. (25), p. 11.

126 Conklin, Alice L., In the Museum of Man: Race, Anthropology, and Empire in France, 1850–1950, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013, pp. 2–3 Google Scholar.

127 Zimmerman, op. cit. (112), pp. 243–244; Evans, op. cit. (62), p. 12.

128 Barkan, op. cit. (106), pp. 57–58; Dias, op. cit. (36), p. 56; Rees, Amanda, ‘Stories of stones and bones: disciplinarity, narrative and practice in British popular prehistory, 1911–1935’, BJHS (2016) 49(3), pp. 433–451, 437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

129 Stocking, op. cit. (30), pp. 351–352; Blanckaert, op. cit. (31), p. 48; Hammond, op. cit. (101), pp. 126, 128.

130 Stocking, op. cit. (42), pp. 248–249.

131 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 61; Dias, op. cit. (36), pp. 26–27, 56.

132 Hammond, op. cit. (101), p. 129; Stocking, op. cit. (30), p. 357.

133 Modesto Sanemeterio Cobo, ‘Les origines de l’Ecole d'anthropologie de Paris’ (1999), at http://archive.is/svvH, accessed 22 February 2014.

134 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 53.

135 Broca, Paul, ‘La race celtique ancienne et moderne: Arvernes et Armoricains – Auvergnats et bas-Bretons’, Revue d'anthropologie (1873) 2, pp. 577–628, 591, 599Google Scholar.

136 Dias, op. cit. (50), pp. 208, 224; Quine, op. cit. (53), pp. 130–131, 141.

137 Flower, W.H., ‘On the classification of the varieties of the human species’, Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (1885) 14, pp. 378–395, 378Google Scholar.

138 Haddon, Alfred Cort, The Races of Man, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1924, p. 27 Google Scholar; Coon, Carlton, The Races of Europe, New York: Macmillan, 1939, p. 284 Google Scholar.

139 Pittard, Eugène, Les peuples des Balkans: Recherches anthropologiques dans la péninsule das Balkans, spécialement dans la Dobrudja, Geneva: Georg, 1920, p. 10 Google Scholar.

140 Făcăoaru, Iordache, ‘Amesticul rasial şi etnic in România’, Buletinul Eugenic şi Biopolitic (1938) 9(9–10), pp. 276–287, 210–211Google Scholar; McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 29.

141 Blanckaert, op. cit. (31), p. 48.

142 Myres, op. cit. (86), p. xxvi; Comas, op. cit. (86), p. 66; Pogliano, op. cit. (83), p. 42.

143 Blanckaert, op. cit. (42), p. 195; MacMaster, op. cit. (114), p. 13.

144 Keane, op. cit. (90), p. 205; Odom, op. cit. (23), p. 16.

145 Deniker, Joseph, ‘Les races européennes’, Bulletins de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris (1897), Ser. 4 8, pp. 189–208, 291–302, 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

146 Todorov, op. cit. (117), pp. 141, 144.

147 Keith, Arthur, ‘The evolution of the human races’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (1928) 58, pp. 305–321, 310–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lahovary, Nicolae, Istoria şi o nouă metodă de determinare a rasselor: Încercare de sinteză cu privire la bazele bioantropologice ale istoriei în legatură cu trecutul europei şi al neamului românesc, Bucharest: Cultura Natională, 1927, p. 10 Google Scholar; Rosiński, Boleslav, ‘Spostrzeżenia z pogranicza antropologji i socilogji’, Kosmos (1929) Ser. B 54(2), pp. 265–276, 265Google Scholar.

148 Pogliano, op. cit. (83), pp. 45, 492.

149 Majewski, Erazm, ‘Rasa a narod: Naród i cywilizacya’, Światowit (1905) 6, pp. 162–171, 164–165Google Scholar.

150 Czekanowski, Jan, Antropologia polska w międzywojennym dwudziestoleciu 1919–1939, Warsaw: Towarzystwo Naukowe Warszawskie: Wydział IV Nauk Biologychnych, 1948, p. 27 Google Scholar; Eickstedt, op. cit. (99), p. 82–83.

151 Kollmann, op. cit. (96), pp. 115–117; Sergi, Giuseppe, Specie e Varietà Umane: Saggio di una sistematica antropologica, Turin: Fratelli Bocca, 1900, p. 8 Google Scholar.

152 Günther, Hans F.K., Kleine Rassenkunde des Deutsches Volkes, Munich: Lehmann, 1933, p. 11 Google Scholar; Czekanowski, Jan, ‘The racial structure of Silesia’, Baltic and Scandinavian Countries (1937) 3(2 [6]), pp. 227–233, 228–230Google Scholar.

153 Morant, op. cit. (92), p. 153; Evola, Julius, Sintesi di dottrina della razza, Milan: Ulrico Hoepli, 1941, pp. 34–35 Google Scholar.

154 Proctor, op. cit. (60), p. 143–145, 148; Massin, op. cit. (37), pp. 116, 130–131; Puschner, op. cit. (85), pp. 87–89; MacMaster, op. cit. (114), p. 5–6.

155 Field, Geoffrey G., ‘Nordic racism’, Journal of the History of Ideas (1977) 38(3), pp. 523–540, 528CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

156 Mazumdar, Pauline M.H., ‘Blood and soil: the serology of the Aryan racial state’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine (1990) 64(2), pp. 187–219, 194Google ScholarPubMed; Kühl, Stefan, Die Internationale der Rassisten: Aufstieg und Niedergang der internationalen Bewegung für Eugenik und Rassenhygiene im 20. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1997, p. 38 Google Scholar; Field, op. cit. (155), p. 528.

157 Lutzhöft, op. cit. (94), p. 23; Kurnatowska, Zofia and Kurnatowski, Stanislaw, ‘Der Einfluss nationalistischer Ideen auf die mitteleuropaeische Urgeschichtsforschung’, in Piskorski, Jan M., Hackmann, Joerg and Jaworski, Rudolf (eds.), Deutsche Ostforschung und polnische Westforschung in Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft und Politik, Osnabrück: Fibre, 2002, p. 98 Google Scholar; Kossinna, Gustaf, ‘Der Ursprung der Urfinnen und der Urindogermanen und ihre Ausbreitung nach dem Osten’, Mannus (1909) 1, pp. 17–52, 225–245Google Scholar, (1910) 2, pp. 59–108, 18–19.

158 Mazumdar, op. cit. (156), p. 191; Schneider, W.H., ‘The history of research on blood group genetics: initial discovery and diffusion’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences (1996) 18(3), pp. 273–303, 296Google Scholar.

159 Fee, op. cit. (87), p. 427.

160 Herz, Friedrich, Rasse und Kultur: Eine kritische Untersuchung der Rassentheorien, Leipzig: Kröner, 1925, p. 14 Google Scholar; Chamberlain, Houston Steward, Die Grundlagen des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts, Munich: F. Bruckmann K.-G., 1938 Google Scholar; first published 1899, pp. 313, 317–318.

161 Chamberlain, op. cit (160), pp. 313, 317–320.

162 Turda, Marius, ‘In search of racial types: soldiers and the anthropological mapping of the Romanian nation, 1914–44’, Patterns of Prejudice (2012) 47(1), pp. 1–21, 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Malik, Kenan, The Meaning of Race: Race, History and Culture in Western Society, Houndmills and London: Macmillan, 1996, p. 84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hannaford, Ivan, Race: The History of an Idea in the West, 1996, Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, pp. 349–350 Google Scholar.

163 Proctor, op. cit. (60), p. 138; Rosenberg, Alfred, Der Mythos des 20. Jahrhunderts: Eine Wertung der seelisch-geistigen Gestaltenkämpfe unsere Zeit, 1930, Munich: Hoheneichen Google Scholar; Evola, op. cit. (153), pp. 34–35, 73–77.

164 Köster, Werner, Die Rede über den “Raum”: Zur semantischen Karriere eines deutschen Konzepts, Heidelberg: Synchron, 2002, p. 74 Google Scholar.

165 Lixfeld, Hannajost, Folklore and Fascism: The Reich Institute for German Volkskunde, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994, pp. 12–13, 20–21Google Scholar; Sklenář, op. cit. (82), p. 151.

166 Lixfeld, op. cit. (165), pp. 12–13, 20–21.

167 Rączkowski, Włodzimierz, ‘“Drang nach Westen”? Polish archaeology and national identity’, in Díaz-Andreu, Margarita and Champion, Timothy, Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe, London: UCL Press, 1996, pp. 189–217, 190–194Google Scholar; Kossinna, op. cit. (157), 18–19.

168 MacMaster, op. cit. (114), pp. 42–43; Kühl, op. cit. (156), pp. 23, 54–55.

169 Făcăoaru, op. cit. (58), pp. 211–217; Kühl, op. cit. (156), pp. 59, 93; Felder, Björn M., ‘“God forgives – but Nature never will”: racial identity, racial anthropology, and eugenics in Latvia 1918–1940’, in Felder, Björn M. and Weindling, Paul J. (eds.), Baltic Eugenics: Bio-politics, Race and Nation in Interwar Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania 1918–1940, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2013, pp. 115–146, 129Google Scholar.

170 Weindling, Paul, Health, Race and German Politics between National Unification and Nazism 1870–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 7 Google Scholar; Massin, op. cit. (37), pp. 137; Kühl, op. cit. (156), pp. 56–57.

171 Klein, op. cit. (7), p. 65; Alvargonzález, D., ‘Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and the sciences’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (2011) 25(4), pp. 387–403, 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kevles, Daniel J., In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985, pp. 70–72 Google Scholar.

172 Gould, op. cit. (39), p. 124.

173 Odom, op. cit. (23), p. 16; MacMaster, op. cit. (114), pp. 38–39.

174 Pogliano, op. cit. (83), pp. 34–35; Gould, op. cit. (39), p. 162.

175 Gheorghe Popoviciu, ‘Asemănări şi diferenţe în structura de rase sanghine a Românilor şi popoarelor conlocuitoare şi învecinate’, Dare De Seamă Asupra Şedinţelor: Societăţii Române De Antropologie Din Cluj (1935–1936), p. 78; Făcăoaru, Iordache, ‘Valoarea biorasială a naţiunilor europene şi a provinciilor româneşti: O primă încercare de ierarhizare etnică’, Buletinul Eugenic şi Biopolitic (1943) 14(9–10), pp. 278–310, 296Google Scholar; Manuilă, Al., Originea Neamului Românesc în interpretarea sa biologică, Bucharest: Institutul Statistic, 1943, p. 7 Google Scholar; Schneider, op. cit. (158), p. 282

176 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 39.

177 Boyd, William C., ‘Critique of methods of classifying mankind’, in Count, Earl W. (ed.), This Is Race: An Anthology Selected from the International Literature on the Races of Man, New York: Schuman, 1950, pp. 637–653, 642Google Scholar; Marks, Jonathan, ‘The legacy of serological studies in American physical anthropology’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences (1996) 18(3), pp. 345–362, 353Google ScholarPubMed; Pogliano, op. cit. (83), pp. 102, 396–397.

178 Hirschfeld, L. and Hirschfeld, H., ‘Essai d'application des méthodes sérologiques au problème des races’, L'Anthropologie (1918) 29, pp. 505–537, 509, 518, 535–536Google Scholar.

179 Pogliano, op. cit. (83), pp. 33, 100; Necrasov, Olga C., Etude anthropologique de la Moldavie et de la Bessarabie septentrionales, Bucharest: Imprimerie nationale, 1941, pp. 132, 136Google Scholar; Schneider, op. cit. (158), p. 285.

180 MacMaster, op. cit. (114), pp. 35–41; Kevles, op. cit. (171), p. 46; Majewski, op. cit. (149), pp. 162–163.

181 Massin, op. cit. (37), p. 130.

182 Field, op. cit. (155), pp. 524–526; Czekanowski, Jan, Człowiek w czasie i przestrzenie, Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1967, p. 47 Google Scholar; Lutzhöft, op. cit. (94), pp. 21, 92.

183 Proctor, op. cit. (60), pp. 146, 157; Czekanowski, op. cit. (182), p. 48.

184 Proctor, op. cit. (60), pp. 158–169; Coon, op. cit. (138), p. 286.

185 McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 56.

186 Eickstedt, op. cit. (57), pp. 140–141; Kühl, op. cit. (156), pp. 34, 50, 53, 58–60, 66–68, 87; Felder, op. cit. (169), p. 120.

187 McMahon, op. cit. (4), pp. 59–64. I explore the reasons in McMahon, op. cit. (4), p. 60–64; and McMahon, Richard, ‘Transnational race classification: scientific network and system of narratives’, in McMahon (ed.), National Races: Scientific Classification and Political Identity, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, forthcomingGoogle Scholar.

188 McMahon, op. cit. (4).

189 T. Bielicki, T. Krupinski and J. Strzalko, History of Physical Anthropology in Poland, International Association of Human Biologists, Occasional Papers (1985) 6, 7.

190 Schwidetzky, Ilse, ‘Die Rassenforschung in Polen’, Zeitschrift für Rassenkunde und ihre Nachbargebiete (1935) 1, pp. 76–83, 136–204, 289–314, 140–141Google Scholar.

191 Schwidetzky, op. cit. (190).

192 Collis, John, The Celts: Origins, Myths & Inventions, Stroud: Tempus, 2003, pp. 86, 151Google Scholar; Kurnatowska and Kurnatowski, op. cit. (157), pp. 97–98; Sklenář, op. cit. (82), p. 151.

193 Czekanowski, Jan, ‘Sto Lat Antropologii Polskiej 1856–1956, Osrodek Lwowski’, Materiały i Prace Antropologiczne (1956) 34, pp. 41–42 Google Scholar; Schwidetzky, op. cit. (190), pp. 152, 162–164, 199, 302.

194 Marks, op. cit. (177), p. 346.

195 Pogliano, op. cit. (83), p. 47; Mazumdar, op. cit. (156), p. 193. Eastern German concentrations of group B therefore ‘proved’ Slav influence. Râmneanţu, Petru, ‘Distribuţia grupelor de sînge la populaţia din Transilvania’, Buletinul Eugenic şi Biopolitic (1941) 12(9–12), pp. 137–159, 147Google Scholar.

196 Rees, op. cit. (128), p. 450.

197 McMahon, op. cit. (4), pp. 48–50.