Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:09:36.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Darwin at Llanymynech: the evolution of a geologist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Michael B. Roberts
Michael B. Roberts
Affiliation:
Chirk Vicarage, Trevor Road, Chirk, Wrexham, Clwyd LL14 5HD.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1831 was a momentous year for Charles Darwin. He passed his BA examination on 22 January, stayed up in Cambridge for two further terms and returned to The Mount, his home in Shrewsbury, in mid-June. On 6 August he left Shrewsbury with Adam Sedgwick for a geological field trip to North Wales, and after his lone traverse over the Harlech Dome returned to The Mount on Monday 29 August to find letters from John Stevens Henslow and George Peacock inviting him to joint HMS Beagle. This geological field trip was crucial for his work on the Beagle. For example, when he began his first geological work of the voyage on Quail Island, he was by that time a competent geologist. Though others have studied the North Wales tour in some detail, there is also another earlier and much briefer episode to consider. Darwin appears to have geologized on his own at Llanymynech in July. The contrast between his first recorded attempts at Llanymynech in July 1831 and then elsewhere in North Wales in August 1831 is most instructive, as his development as a geologist can be followed in his field notes. Retracing his steps today, and comparing his measurements and observations with new ones, throws light on what he might have learnt at different points during that summer.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 469 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Herbert, S., ‘Charles Darwin as a prospective geological author’, BJHS (1991), 24, 159–92, on 164–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Burkhardt, F. and Smith, S. (eds.), Correspondence of Charles Darwin, 9 vols., Cambridge, 1985–1995, i, 124.Google Scholar

3 Burkhardt, and Smith, , op. cit. (2), i, 125.Google Scholar

4 Cambridge University Library (CUL), Manuscripts, DAR 5 (series 2), 1–2.

5 Barrett, P. H., ‘The Sedgwick-Darwin geological tour of North Wales’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (1974), 118, 146–64Google Scholar, transcription on 155–62. The manuscript of Darwin's North Wales trip is in CUL, DAR 5, fols. 5–14. There are twenty sheets, the first being numbered ‘5’, and those are referred to here as 5i, 5ii, 6i, 6ii etc.

6 Secord, J. A., ‘The discovery of a vocation; Darwin's early geology’, BJHS (1991), 24, 133–57; 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Darwin's annotations on his copy of Jameson.

7 Miles, T. R., Dyslexia, London, 1983, ch. 11.Google Scholar

8 Secord, , op. cit. (6), 144 n31.Google Scholar

9 I was given an estimate of 9 m.p.h. from Miss Joan Hanmer, former groom at Chirk Castle, where Fanny Mostyn Owen lived after she married Robert Myddelton Biddulph. Fanny was buried in the crypt at Chirk Parish Church in 1888. See also Burkhardt, and Smith, , op. cit. (2), i, 192.Google Scholar

10 Adam Sedgwick, entries for 4 and 5 August 1831, Sedgwick's Journal, No. XXI (1831), pp. 11 and 13, Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge. See also Sedgwick, to Murchison, R. I., 13 09 1831Google Scholar, in Clark, J. W. and Hughes, T. M., The Life and Letters of Adam Sedgwick, 2 vols., Cambridge, 1890, i, 377–9, on 378.Google Scholar In his notes on Llanymynech Sedgwick uses a particular manuscript notation,‘+NB’, which is also used to mark notes made by the leadkilns at Pontesford (Pontesbury) referring to ‘a very rich lead vein at Snailbeach’, a lead mine 5 miles from Pontesbury, a place Sedgwick could hardly have visited that day on time grounds, yet was worthy of detailed notes.

11 Darwin, C. and Huxley, T. H., Autobiographies, Oxford, 1983, 39.Google Scholar Personal communication, Adam Perkins, Cambridge University Library. However, a library search is necessary.

12 Secord, , op. cit. (6), 137.Google Scholar

13 Barrett, , op. cit. (5), 159Google Scholar; CUL, DAR 5, fol. 10ii.

14 Barrett, , op. cit. (5), 162Google Scholar; CUL, DAR, 5, fol. 14i.

15 Burkhardt, and Smith, , op. cit. (2), iv, 280Google Scholar, 18 November 1849.

16 Secord, , op. cit. (6).Google Scholar

17 Herbert, , op. cit. (1), 164–5.Google Scholar

18 Barrett, , op. cit. (5), 156Google Scholar; CUL, DAR 5, fol. 8ii.

19 Secord, , op. cit. (6), 146Google Scholar; Barrett, , op. cit. (5), 147–8, 157Google Scholar; and CUL, DAR 5, fol. 8i and ii.

20 Darwin, and Huxley, , op. cit. (11), 39Google Scholar; Clarke, and Hughes, , op. cit. (10), i, 380–1Google Scholar; Burkhardt, and Smith, , op. cit. (2), i, 137–8.Google Scholar

21 Barrett, , op. cit. (5), 159–60Google Scholar; CUL, DAR 5, fol. 11i.

22 Barrett, , op. cit. (5), 160Google Scholar; CUL, DAR 5, fol. 11ii.

23 Barrett, , op. cit. (5), 160Google Scholar; CUL, DAR 5, fol. 11i and ii.

24 Burkhardt, and Smith, , op. cit. (2), i, 137.Google Scholar

25 Dr S. Tunnicliff, private correspondence; Internal British Geological Survey reports, WH/PD/80/12, WH/PD/80/87 and WH/PD/80/32.

26 Darwin, and Huxley, , op. cit. (11), 39.Google Scholar

27 Burkhardt, and Smith, , op. cit. (2), i, 238, 308.Google Scholar

28 Secord, , op. cit. (6), 144.Google Scholar

29 CUL, DAR 5 (series 2), fols 1–2.