Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:18:03.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English Catholic Bishops in the Early Elizabethan Era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

Kenneth W. T. Carleton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Queen Mary Tudor died on the night of 17 November 1558. A few hours later, across the river at Lambeth, her cousin, Reginald Pole, Cardinal Archbishop of Canterbury, followed her, victim of the ague which he had contracted in the summer. England again had a change of monarch, the third in less than twelve years. What was not clear at the time was whether there would be another change in religion. With hindsight, it is clear that the programme of reform which sought to reunite the English Church with the see of Rome and to revivify it with the Tridentine reforms with which Pole had been so closely involved, had died also on that November night. Parliament was in session when Mary died, and immediately Elizabeth was proclaimed queen by Nicholas Heath, Archbishop of York, in his capacity as Lord Chancellor; there was no dissent such as had accompanied the accession of the new Queen's half-sister. It soon became clear, however, that the daughter of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn was unlikely to retain the settlement of religion in the precise form in which it had been left by the daughter of Katharine of Aragon. On Christmas Day, the Queen ordered that the elevation of the Blessed Sacrament was not to take place during the Mass to be celebrated in her chapel by the Bishop of Carlisle, Owen Oglethorpe. His refusal to obey this command led the Queen to leave the chapel after the gospel had been read. Two days later, a royal proclamation restored the first liturgical changes of Henry VIII, ordering that the epistle and gospel of the Mass were thenceforward to be read in English, along with the litany which usually preceded the service. The coronation of Elizabeth should have been conducted by the senior surviving churchman, Heath of York; he had resigned the Chancellorship before the end of 1558, and declined to conduct the service. It was Oglethorpe, as bishop of a suffragan see of the Northern Province, who crowned the new Queen, with no other diocesan bishops present. The coronation Mass was sung by one of the Reformers, Dr. George Carewe, who omitted the elevation, and another Reformer preached the sermon.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Catholic History , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , May 1996 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Catholic Record Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 John Jewel to Peter Martyr, from London, 28 April 1559, ZL p. 20.

2 Letter of Richard Scudamore to Sir Philip, Hoby, 23 February 1550, Camden Miscellany XXX, Camden Fourth Series, Volume 39, (London, 1990), p. 122.Google Scholar

3 Loades, D. M., The Oxford Martyrs, (London, 1970), p. 217.Google Scholar

4 If we exclude the Bishop of Sodor and Man, Stanley Thomas, who took the oath and continued in office until his death in 1570, on the basis that his see, unlike every other diocese of the English Church, had no temporal baronetcy attached to it giving its bishop a seat in the House of Lords.

5 The letters of Robert Joseph, a Benedictine of Evesham, covering the period of his residence there from 1521 to 1530 give a very strong impression of a place where Erasmian humanism was flourishing.

6 Hughes, P., The Reformation in England, (London, 1950–54), Vol. 3, p. 36.Google Scholar

7 Tunstall had been reassured by the King in a letter of 1533 that no claim to potestas ordinis arose out of the Supremacy; see Davies, E. T., Episcopacy and the Royal Supremacy in the Church of England in the Sixteenth Century, (Oxford, 1950), pp. 63–64.Google Scholar

8 Tunstall, sig.C.iiii r.

9 Theophylact ad Romanos, cited Tunstall, sig.D.ii v.

10 Strype, J., Ecclesiastical Memorials, (Oxford, 1822), Vol. 1, part 1, p. 519.Google Scholar

11 Cyprian, De ecclesiae cathoticae unitate, ed. and trans. Bevenot, M., (Oxford, 1971), p. 64.Google Scholar

12 Hall, S. G. Doctrine and Practice in the Early Church, (London, 1991), p. 89.Google Scholar

13 Strype, Ecclesiastical Memorials, Vol. 1, part 2, pp. 314—5.

14 1 Mary Stat.3 c.2.

15 Dickens, A. G., The Marian Reaction in the Diocese of York, (Part 1, The Clergy; Part 2, The Laity) Borthwick Institute, St. Anthony's Hall Publications Nos 11 and 12 (York, 1957), part 1, pp. 5–8.Google Scholar

16 The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe, ed. Cattley, S. R., 8 volumes (London, 1837–9), Vol. VIII, p. 86;Google Scholar Hughes, P., Rome and the Counter-Reformation in England, ([London], 1942), p. 103;Google Scholar Brigden, S., London and the Reformation, (Oxford, 1989), pp. 613–4.Google Scholar

17 Hembry, P. M., The Bishops of Bath and Wells, 1530-1640, (London, 1967), pp. 89, 98.Google Scholar

18 Vage, J. A. ‘The Diocese of Exeter 1519-1641: a Study of Church Government in the Age of the Reformation’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1991, p. 105.Google Scholar

19 Frere, W. H., and Kennedy, W. M., ed., Visitation Articles and Injunctions of the period of the Reformation, Volume II, 1536–1558, Alcuin Club Collections, XV, (London, 1910), p. 328.Google Scholar

20 Duffy, E., The Stripping of the Altars. Traditional Religion in England C.1400–C.1580, (New Havenand London, 1992), p. 534.Google Scholar

21 Visitation Articles and Injunctions, pp. 360-1, 401.

22 The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe, Vol. 4, p. 621.Google Scholar

23 Haigh, C., English Reformations. Religion, Politics, and Society under the Tudors, (Oxford, 1993),pp. 240–1.Google Scholar

24 Watson, fol.clviii.

25 Watson, fol.clxiii, v.

26 Watson, fol.clvi, v. However, the importance given to the sacrament of penance would suggest that it, with its requirement of at least annual recourse to auricular confession to a priest, was seen to be one of the principal means of restoring Catholicism amongst the ordinary people. His own later history was one of the most troubled of all the deposed Marian bishops.

27 Barraclough, G., The Medieval Papacy, (London, 1968), p. 108.Google Scholar

28 Fenlon, D., Heresy and Obedience in Tridentine Italy, (Cambridge, 1972), p. 155.Google Scholar

29 Hughes, Rome and the Counter-Reformation, p. 93.

30 Jewel to Martyr, from London, 22 May 1560, ZL p. 79.

31 Jewel to Martyr, from London, 1 August 1559, ZL p. 39.

32 The letter, and the Queen's reply, are now lost.

33 Hughes, The Reformation in England, Vol. 3, p. 42.

34 Letters of William Allen and Richard Barret 1572-1598, ed. Renold, P., Catholic Record Society 1967, p. 280.Google Scholar