Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:23:30.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring and Managing the Economic Risks and Costs of With-Profits Business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

A.J. Hibbert  and
C.J. Turnbull
A.J. Hibbert
Affiliation:
Barrie & Hibbert Limited, 48 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7HF, U.K., Tel: +44(0)131-625-0203, Fax: +44(0)131-625-0215, Email: [email protected]
C.J. Turnbull
Affiliation:
Barrie & Hibbert Limited, 48 Melville Street, Edinburgh EH3 7HF, U.K., Tel: +44(0)131-625-0203, Fax: +44(0)131-625-0215, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The approaches to liability valuation, assessment of prudential capital and measurement of profit for life offices are undergoing radical change. A common thread runs through all of these proposed changes — each change represents a move away from traditional actuarial approaches towards a more economically coherent, market-consistent approach. These changes should encourage a general improvement in the life industry's risk management processes. However, they will come at a cost. The measurement of the economic risks generated by the complex guarantees written by life offices is far more difficult than applying the latest resilience test equity fall. This will require a step change in the sophistication of life offices' risk and capital measurement and management know-how. The measurement of value, risk and capital will soon demand the application of ‘stochastic’ modelling tools. In this paper, we explore some of the issues raised by the application of these approaches to the valuation and risk management of with-profits business.

Keywords

Market-Consistent ValuationStochastic Asset ModellingWith-ProfitsRisk-Based CapitalOption PricingRisk-Neutral PricingDynamic HedgingDeltas
Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , 01 October 2003 , pp. 725 - 777
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxter, M. & Rennie, A. (1996). Financial calculus. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F. & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, P., Broadie, M. & Glasserman, P. (1997). Monte-Carlo methods for security pricing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21, 1267–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, M.H.D. (1997). Actuaries and derivatives. British Actuarial Journal, 3, 51–180 and 381–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M. & Pliska, S. (1981). Stochastic processes and their applications. 11, 215–260.Google Scholar
Hull, J. & White, A. (1994). Numerical procedures for implementing term structure models. Journal of Derivatives, 2, no 2, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, J. & White, A. (2000). Forward rate volatilities, swap rate volatilities, and implementation of the LIBOR market model. Journal of Fixed Income, 10, no 2, 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 141–183.Google Scholar
Wilkie, A.D. (1987). An option pricing approach to bonus policy. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 114, 21–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmott, P. (1998). Derivatives. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar