Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:31:06.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Liquidity: essence, risk, institutions, markets and regulation: a report of the liquidity working party

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Abstract

This study is a subjective synthesis of the work of many academics, supervisors and practitioners on the topic of liquidity and many of its multiple aspects. It borrows heavily and freely from those works in the pursuit of coherence, as this subject can be both confused and confusing. Although many hypotheses, both established and speculative, are referred to, none is proposed in this paper. In order to be of possible use to a range of readers, it roams from the most basic and elementary to some of the most recent and advanced. In pursuit of brevity and readability, in many instances it can do little more than introduce a particular feature and leave further investigation to the reader. Liquidity is clearly a topic with much unfinished business. Our ambition in writing this paper is threefold: first, to raise awareness amongst actuaries of the wide-ranging implications for actuarial work of liquidity; second, to bring some coherence to the manifold measures and uses of the concept of liquidity by attempting to synthesise some of the key elements of knowledge today; finally, to highlight some of the more high profile and open questions relevant for actuarial work. This paper makes many references to behaviour during the crisis and its aftermath; however, it is not intended to be a forensic analysis of the crisis attributing causality. The crisis has simply served as an experiment during which many things became observable.

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Advances in Monetary and Financial Measurement (AMFM). Available at: http://www.centerforfinancialstability.org/amfm.php [Accessed 15 December 2015].Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for lemons, qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amato, M. & Fantacci, L. (2012). The End of Finance. Polity.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. (1976). Agreeing to disagree. The Annals of Statistics 4(6), 12361239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, J., Pan, J. & Wang, J. (2011). The illiquidity of corporate bonds. Journal of Finance 66(3), 911946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank for International Settlements (1999). Market liquidity: research findings and selected policy implications. CGFS Publications No. 11.Google Scholar
BIS Committee on the Global Financial System (2011). Global liquidity – concept, measurement and policy implications, Paper 45, available at http://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs45.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015).Google Scholar
Bloomfield, R.J., O’Hara, M. & Saar, G. (2006). The limits of noise trading: an experimental analysis, Cornell University working paper, Cornell University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clower, R. (1965). The Keynesian Counter-Revolution: A Theoretical Appraisal” in Hahn & Brechling “The Theory of Interest Rates”. Macmillan.Google Scholar
D’Souza, C. & Gaa, C. (2004). The effect of economic news on bond market liquidity, Bank of Canada Working Paper No. 2004–16, Bank of Canada.Google Scholar
Demyanyk, Y. & Van Hemert, O. (2008). Understanding the subprime mortgage crisis, working paper, Federal Reserve Bank, St Louis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, J. & Renault, O. (2001). Liquidity and credit risk, FAME Research Paper Series rp42, International Center for Financial Asset Management and Engineering.Google Scholar
Fender, I. & Scheicher, M. (2008). The ABX: how do the markets price subprime mortgage risk. BIS Quarterly Review, September.Google Scholar
Fender, I. & Scheicher, M. (2009). The pricing of subprime mortgage risk in good times and bad, Working Paper No. 1056, European Central Bank, May.Google Scholar
Fleming, M.J. (2003). Measuring treasury market liquidity. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, September, available at http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/epr/03v09n3/0309flem.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015).Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.-S., Garcia, R. & Gungor, S. (2013). Funding liquidity risk and the cross-section of stock returns (preprint).Google Scholar
Gehr, A.K. & Martell, T.F. (1992). Pricing efficiency in the secondary market for investment-grade corporate bonds. The Journal of Fixed Income 2(3), 2438.Google Scholar
Hauser, A. (2014). Why there is life after death: four myths about the future of securities financing markets, Speech given at JP Morgan’s Collateral Management and Securities Financing Forum, London.Google Scholar
Hogan, T.L. (2012). Competition in currency, the potential for private money, Cato Institute, 23 May.Google Scholar
Holl, T. & Winn, R. (1995). Comparability of different measures of liquidity on the Australian stock exchange, technical report, Security Industry Research Center of Asia-Pacific.Google Scholar
Holmström, B. & Tirole, J. (2011). Inside and Outside Liquidity. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotchkiss, E. & Jostova, G. (2007). Determinants of corporate bond trading: a comprehensive analysis, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1001459 (accessed 15 December 2015).Google Scholar
Houweling, P., Mentink, A. & Vorst, T. (2005). Comparing possible proxies of corporate bond liquidity. Journal of Banking and Finance 29(6), 13311358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Capital Market Association (2014). 26th ICMA ERC European Repo Survey, available at http://www.icmagroup.org/Regulatory-Policy-and-Market-Practice/short-term-markets/Repo-Markets/repo/latest/ (accessed 15 December 2015).Google Scholar
Jankowitsch, R., Mösenbacher, H. & Pichler, S. (2006). Measuring the liquidity impact on EMU government bond prices The European Journal of Finance 12(2), 153169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jevons, W.S. (1875). Money and the Mechanism of Exchange D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
Jurgilas, M. & Zikes, F. (2012). Implicit intraday interest rate in the UK unsecured overnight money market, Working Paper No. 447, Bank of England.Google Scholar
Keating, C. & Marshall, B. (2010a). Trust and markets – the SubPrime WhoDunnit solved? EFFAS-EBC European Bond Commission.Google Scholar
Keating, C. & Marshall, B. (2010b). Banking on liquidity: liquidity, collateral and derivatives, Edhec Risk Institute, available at http://ebookbrowsee.net/banking-on-liquidity-con-keating-and-barry-marshall-pdf-d109765458 (accessed 15 December 2015).Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1936). General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
King, M. (2006). Trusting in money: from Kirkcaldy to the MPC, The Adam Smith lecture.Google Scholar
Kiyotake, N. & Moore, J. (2001). Evil is the root of all money, Clarendon lecture.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. ([1969] 2002). Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press, 1969. Reissued by Blackwell Publishers, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahanti, S., Nashikkar, A., Subrahmanyam, M., Chacko, G. & Mallik, G. (2008). Latent liquidity: a new measure of liquidity, with an application to corporate bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 88(2), 272298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malherbe, F. (2014). Self-fulfilling liquidity dry-ups. The Journal of Finance 69(2), 947970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeay, M., Raida, A. & Thomas, R. (2014). Money in the modern economy: an introduction. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Q1.Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute (2013). Financial globalisation: Retreat or Reset? Global capital markets.Google Scholar
Memorandum to Members of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (2010). Wall Street and the financial crisis: the role of investment banks, 26 April.Google Scholar
Morris, S. & Shin, H. (2010). Contagious adverse selection, working paper, Princeton University, March.Google Scholar
Nunn, K.P., Hill, J. & Schneeweis, T. (1986). Corporate bond price data sources and return/risk measurement. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis V, 197208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. (2012). What we don’t understand about trust, available at http://www.ted.com/talks/onora_o_neill_what_we_don_t_understand_about_trust (accessed 15 December 2015).Google Scholar
Roll, R. (1984). A simple effective measure of the implicit bid-ask spread in an efficient market. Journal of Finance XXXIX.Google Scholar
Singh, M. (2013). The changing collateral landscape, IMF Working Paper No. 13/25, IMF.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. (1963). Commercial banks as creators of “money”, Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers No. 159, Cowles Foundation.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P.C. (2007). Does liquidity affect securities market efficiency? University of Texas, working paper, University of Texas, available at http://www.columbia.edu/~pt2238/papers/Tetlock_Liquidity_and_Efficiency_03_07.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015).Google Scholar
Turner, A. (2014). Escaping the debt addiction: monetary and macro-prudential policy in the post crisis world, Centre for Financial Studies.Google Scholar
Werner, R. (2014). The money game, Talk presented to the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Risk and Investment Conference.Google Scholar
Zhou, X. (2009). Reform the international monetary system. BIS Review 41.Google Scholar
Zigrand, J.-P. (2014). Systems and systemic risk in finance and economics, London School of Economics SRC Special Paper No. 1, London School of Economics, available at http://www.systemicrisk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/publications/sp-1_0.pdf (accessed 15 December 2015).Google Scholar
Z/Yen (2011). Capacity trade and credit: Emerging architectures for commerce and money, Report prepared for the City of London Corporation, ESRC, and Recipco.Google Scholar