Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-4thr5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:18:02.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corporate Decisions in General Insurance: Beyond the Frontier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

M. P. Cumberworth
Affiliation:
Prudential Portfolio Managers U. K. Limited, Laurence Pountney Hill, London, EC4R 0HH, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)20-7548-3411; Fax: +44 (0)20-7548-3875; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper shows how the powerful and flexible tool of stochastic modelling can be applied to a range of business decisions extending far beyond the asset allocation solutions that are common to many asset/liability modelling studies. The example used to demonstrate these techniques is a general insurance case study, but similar principles can be extended to many different business situations. At each stage of the analysis we consider the implications of modern financial theory on the management decision process together with a practical perspective on observed behaviour in the real world. Opportunities are taken to suggest directions in which further research may be of benefit to the actuarial profession.

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bride, M. & Lomax, M.W. (1994). Valuation and corporate management in a non-life insurance company. J.I.A. 121, 363440.Google Scholar
Copeland, T., Koller, T. & Murrin, J.(1995) Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies. Wiley.Google Scholar
Elton, E. J. & Gruber, M. J. (1981). Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis. Wiley.Google Scholar
Goovaerts, M.J., De Vylder, F. & Haezendonck, J. (1984). Insurance premiums. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hooker, N.D., Bulmer, J.R., Cooper, S.M., Green, P.A.G. & Hinton, P.H. (1996). Risk-based capital in general insurance. B.A.J. 2, 265324.Google Scholar
Ineson, D., Czernuszewicz, A., Eabry, M., Kelsey, R., Moss, G., Orr, J.Pollack, S., Sayers, J., Smith, A., Williamson, I. & Wright, T. (1999). Preliminary report of the capital allocation working group. General Insurance Convention. Institute of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Jensen, F. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm, managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structures. Journal of Financial Economics, October 1976, 3, No 4, 305360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, C.G., Carne, S.A., De Rivaz, N.F.C., Hall, R.E.G., McKelvey, K.J. & Wilkie, A.D. (1995). Capital projects. B.A.J. 1, 155330.Google Scholar
Mehta, S.J.B. (1992). Allowing for asset, liability and business risk in the valuation of a life office. J.I.A. 119, 385455.Google Scholar
Mehta, S.J.B. (1998). Pricing of insurance risk. General Insurance Convention, Institute of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. & Miller, M.H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investments. American Economic Review, 48, 261297.Google Scholar
Sweeney, J.C., Sonlin, S.M., Correnti, S. & Williams, A.P. (1998). Optimal insurance asset allocation in a multi-currency environoment. In Worldwide Asset and Liability Modelling, edited by Ziemba, W.T. & Mulvey, J.M., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F. & French, R. K. (1988). Dividend yields and expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 22, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, Jianmin, & Dyer, J. There is a broad spectrum of papers considering risk and risk perception (many with direct applications to finance) available from the Institute for Operational Research and Management Science website: www.informs.orgGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, M. E. (1973). The fundamental theorem of parameter-preference security valuation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, January, 6169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar