Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:27:47.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Concept of Investment Efficiency and its Application to Investment Management Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

T.M. Hodgson ,
S.J. Breban ,
C.L. Ford ,
M.P. Streatfield  and
R.C. Urwin
R.C. Urwin
Affiliation:
Watson House, London Road, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 9PQ, U.K. Tel: +44(0)1737-241-144; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investment efficiency is a function of the risk, return and total cost of an investment management structure, subject to the fiduciary and other constraints within which investors must operate. Institutional investors implement their investment policies through investment management structures. In this paper the aim is to enhance the investment management structure by broadening the financial objectives, by recognising the effect of behavioural issues and by incorporating governance constraints. We therefore suggest that investment efficiency should be considered as a combination of financial efficiency and non-financial efficiency.

Modern portfolio theory had a revolutionary effect on portfolio construction. In the same way, we believe that investment management structures should be constructed in a more disciplined and quantitative manner. In this paper we outline the quantitative and qualitative methods by which these structures can be developed. The proposed new framework for designing investment management structures seeks to optimise net information ratios while simultaneously recognising the level of regret risk facing fiduciaries, minimising non-financially-productive behavioural biases and taking account of the resources available to the fiduciary to monitor these structures.

Keywords

Active ReturnActive RiskBehavioural FinanceGovernanceInvestmentInvestment Management StructureNet Information Ratio
Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , 01 October 2000 , pp. 451 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AIMR (1995). Behavioural finance and decision theory in investment management. Selected papers, 4 April 1995.Google Scholar
Barber, B.M. & Odean, T. (1998). Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Working Paper, University of California, November 1998.Google Scholar
Beckers, S. (1997). Manager skill and investment performance: how strong is the link? Journal of Portfolio Management, 23, 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.L. (1998a). Why convention dominates pension fund trustee investment decisionmaking. Environment and Planning, 30, 997–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.L. (1998b). The anatomy of corruption: the practice of pension fund trustee decisionmaking. Environment and Planning A 1998, 30, 1235–1253.Google Scholar
Clarke, R.G., Krase, S. & Statman, M. (1994). Tracking errors, regret and tactical asset allocation. Journal of Portfolio Management, 20, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coval, J. & Moskowitz, T. (1999). Home bias at home: local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance, 54, No 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, C. & Tversky, A. (1991). Preferences and beliefs: ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indro, D., Jiang, C., Hu, M. & Lee, W. (1999). Mutual fund performance: does fund size matter? Financial Analysts Journal, May/June 1999, 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, R.N. (1996). Seven quantitative insights into active management: insight two. Barra Newsletter, 165, Fall 1996.Google Scholar
Perold, A. & Salomon, R. (1991). The right amount of assets under management. Financial Analysts Journal, 47, 3, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speidell, L. (1990). Embarrassment and riches: the discomfort of alternative investment strategies. Journal of Portfolio Management, 17, Fall 1990 No 1, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R.H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 12, 3, 183–206.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. (1995). The psychology of decision making. Behavioural Finance and Decision Theory in Investment Management, AIMR Publication, 4 April 1995, 2–6.Google Scholar
The WM Company (1998). Does changing manager improve performance?: an update. The WM Company Research Note, August 1998.Google Scholar
Urwin, R. (1994). Defining and exploiting investment manager skills. Paper presented to Staple Inn Actuarial Society, 18 January 1994.Google Scholar
Urwin, R. (1998). Avoiding disappointment in investment manager selection. Paper presented to the International Association of Consulting Actuaries, March 1998.Google Scholar
Urwin, R. (1999). Mirror, mirror. Pensions World, January 1999.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. & Edwards, M. (1993). Best execution. Financial Analysts Journal, 49, 1, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Wyatt (1999). Structured alpha - its application to institutional funds. Watson Wyatt Monograph, December 1999.Google Scholar
James, K. (2000). The price of retail investing in the U.K. Financial Standards Authority occasional paper OP06.Google Scholar
Leroy, S.F. (1989). Efficient markets and martingales. Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 1583–1621.Google Scholar