Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:50:12.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Sanctuary at Wood Lane End, Hemel Hempstead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

David S. Neal
David S. Neal
Affiliation:
Central Excavation Unit, Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England, 23 Savile Row, London WIX IAB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The context numbering for 1983 follows on from the 1982 excavations. Feature numbers quoted and shown on plans and sections are those used on site. However, for the convenience of this report the actual buildings are renumbered (1–11) and either retain the number given in the previous report (Vol. xiv), or follow on.

Following the reporting of the excavations at this site in the previous issue of Britannia (Vol. xiv), adjacent plots of land were purchased by the developers and incorporated into the new housing estate, the enlarged area comprising a broad swathe of land south of Nos. 108-114 Wood Lane End (FIG. I ) and, in particular, part of the garden of No. 104 which covered much of Building I. Most of the additional land lay outside the protected area but scheduled monument consent was required for construction over the garden of No. 104. This was granted by the DOE provided that the Roman building known to lie there remained undisturbed within the gardens of the new houses. However, during top-soil clearance the south-west side of Building I was accidentally exposed and it became apparent that its plan was not that previously assumed on the evidence of trial-trenching and geophysical survey carried out in 1966-7 and 1982 respectively. In addition, following the stripping of top-soil elsewhere, traces of other Roman buildings and features were discovered. Although development had already begun, the architect and builders were most co-operative in allowing excavation to take place; the excavations were carried out by the DOE's Central Excavation Unit between August and October 1983.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 15 , November 1984 , pp. 193 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © David S. Neal 1984. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Meates, G. W., The Roman Villa at Lullingstone, Kent Vol. 1: The Site Monograph Series of the Kent Archaeological Society No. 1 (1979), fig. 31.Google Scholar

2 For plan see Roman Britain in 1983. FIG. 000 within this issue (Britannia XV).

3 Gillam, J. P. and Daniels, C. M., ‘The Roman Mausoleum on Shorden Brae…’, Arch. Ael. xxxix (1961), 37–62Google Scholar.

4 Lewis, M. J. T., Temples in Roman Britain (Cambridge, 1966), 12.Google Scholar

5 Rodwell, W. (ed.). Temples, Churches and Religions in Roman Britain BAR 77 (1) (1980), 5–30.Google Scholar

6 Lewis, M. J. T., op. cit. (note 4), 26.Google Scholar

7 ibid., 27.

8 These walls, exposed during building operations, were excavated and planned within minutes; their orientation on plan may be liable to error.

9 Fox, G. E. and Hope, W. H. St John, Archaeologia liii, pt. 2(1892), 564.Google Scholar

10 Wheeler, R. E. M. and Wheeler, T. V., Verulamium: A Belgic and two Roman Cities, Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, No. XI (1936), 122–3, Pl. xxxv.Google Scholar

11 Richmond, I. A., ‘Roman Legionaries at Corbridge…‘ Arch. Ael. xxi, 1943, 132–3.Google Scholar

12 Neal, D. S., The Excavations of the Roman Villa in Gadebridge Park, Hemel Hempstead 1963–8, Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, No. XXXI (1974), 14, pl. iv a.Google Scholar

13 Lowther, A. W. G., ‘Report on the Excavation of the Roman Structure at Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden’, Trans. St Albans and Herts. Arch. Soc. (1936–1938), 108–114.Google Scholar

14 King, A. and Soffe, G., ‘A Romano-Celtic temple at Ratham Mill, Funtington, West Sussex’, Britannia xiv (1983), 264–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Anthony, I., Hertfordshire Past and Present i (1960), 2–7.Google Scholar

16 Excavations by the writer completed in 1982. Report in preparation.

17 The writer is grateful to J. Hunn for discussion on the estate boundaries which will be described in the forthcoming Gorhambury report.

18 For discussion of commemorative sites and the cult of the dead see Toynbee, J. M. C., Death and Burial in the Roman World (1971), 61–4, particularly as described in the will of a citizen of Andematunnum, (civitas Lingonum-Langres). CIL xiii, 5708.Google Scholar

18 Hull, M. R., Roman Colchester Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, No. XX (1958), fig. 106.Google Scholar

20 Fox, G. E. and Hope, W. H. St John, ‘Excavations on the site of the Roman city at Silchester, Hants, Archaeologia lii (1890), 773–758, pl. xxx.Google Scholar

21 Lowther, A. W. G. ‘Relief Patterned flue-tiles from the Forum site’ in Kenyon, K., Excavations at the Jewry Wall Site, Leicester, 1948. Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, No. XV. 275–8, fig. 98.Google Scholar

22 ibid., p. 276.

23 cf. Stanfield, J. A. and Simpson, J., Central Gaulish Potters (1958), pl. 157.Google Scholar

24 ibid., pl. 82. 6.

25 ibid., pl. 84. 2.

26 Frere, S. S., Verulamium Excavations Vols I and II. Vol I (1972), Vol II (1983). Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London. Nos. XXVIII and XLI respectively.Google Scholar