Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:20:01.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Plan of the Saxon Shore Fort at Richborough

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Tony Wilmott  and
Philip Smither
Tony Wilmott
Affiliation:
Historic England, [email protected]
Philip Smither
Affiliation:
Department of Classical and Archaeological Studies, University of Kent and English Heritage, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent excavation and coring of the collapsed east wall of the Saxon Shore fort of Richborough has revealed the manner in which the wall collapsed. This led to a re-evaluation of the original siting of the wall, which must have lain to the west of where it is usually depicted. Reassessment of previous excavations, including the examination of original records from the J.P. Bushe-Fox excavations of the 1920s and 1930s leads to the conclusion that the so-called ‘unfinished’ or ‘abandoned’ east wall foundation was in fact the base of the built east wall, from which the collapse derives. A revised fort plan based upon this conclusion is suggested. Supplementary material is available online (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X20000379), and includes additional backing tables and illustrations referenced in the text.

Keywords

RichboroughKentRomanSaxon Shoredefencesmilitary architecturecoinsJ.P. Bushe-Fox
Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 51 , November 2020 , pp. 147 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors, 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Boys, W. 1799: Collections for an History of Sandwich, CanterburyGoogle Scholar
Brown, P.D.C. 1971: ‘The church at Richborough’, Britannia 2, 225–3110.2307/525812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushe-Fox, J.P. 1926: First Report on the Excavation at the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent, Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 6, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushe-Fox, J.P. 1928: Second Report on the Excavation at the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent, Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 7, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushe-Fox, J.P. 1932: Third Report on the Excavation at the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent, Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 10, LondonGoogle Scholar
Bushe-Fox, J.P. 1949: Fourth Report on the Excavation at the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent, Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 16, London10.26530/OAPEN_1004998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B.W. 1968: Fifth Report on the Excavation at the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent, Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London 23, London10.26530/OAPEN_1005013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowker, G. 1872: ‘Account of the Society's researches in the Roman castrum at Richborough’, Archaeologia Cantiana 8, 1–17Google Scholar
Johnson, J.S. 1970: ‘The date of construction of the Saxon Shore fort at Richborough’, Britannia 1, 240–810.2307/525843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. 1976: The Roman Forts of the Saxon Shore, LondonGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. 1981: ‘The construction of the Saxon Shore fort at Richborough’, in Detsicas, A. (ed.), Collectanea Historica: Essays in Memory of Stuart Rigold, Maidstone, 23–31Google Scholar
Linford, N. 2001: Richborough Amphitheatre, Kent: Report on a Ground Penetrating Radar Survey, July 2001, Ancient Monuments Laboratory Report 110/2001, PortsmouthGoogle Scholar
Lyne, M. 2017: ‘The Roman pottery’, in Wilmott, (ed.) 2017, 63–7210.1002/wilm.10569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. 2001a: Richborough Amphitheatre, Kent: Report on Geophysical Surveys, February 2001, English Heritage Centre for Archaeology Report 30/2001, PortsmouthGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. 2001b: Richborough, Kent: Report on Geophysical Surveys, September 2001, English Heritage Centre for Archaeology Report 35/2001, PortsmouthGoogle Scholar
Millett, M., and Wilmott, T. 2003: ‘Rethinking Richborough’, in Wilson, P.R. (ed.), The Archaeology of Roman Towns: Studies in Honour of John S. Wacher, Oxford, 184–94Google Scholar
Moorhead, S. 2017: ‘The coins’, in Wilmott, (ed.) 2017, 59–61Google Scholar
Parfitt, K. 2003: Preliminary Report on a Re-examination of the Fallen East Wall of Richborough Castle, DoverGoogle Scholar
Pearson, A. 2002: The Roman Shore Forts, StroudGoogle Scholar
Pearson, A. 2003: The Construction of the Saxon Shore Forts, BAR British Series 349, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redde, M., Brulet, R., Fellman, R., Haalebos, J.K., and von Schnurbein, S. 2006: L'architecture de la Gaule romaine: les fortifications militaires, BordeauxGoogle Scholar
Roach-Smith, C. 1850: The Antiquities of Richborough, Reculver and Lympne, LondonGoogle Scholar
Wilmott, T. (ed.) 2017: Excavations at Richborough Roman Site, Kent, 2001 and 2008 (Projects 664 and 5629): Draft Assessment Status Report, unpub. report, Historic England, PortsmouthGoogle Scholar
Wilmott, T. in preparation: ‘Survey and excavation at Richborough, Kent’Google Scholar
Wilmott, T., Linford, N., and Martin, M. 2009: ‘The Roman amphitheatre at Richborough (Rutupiae) Kent: non-invasive research’, in Wilmott, T. (ed.), Roman Amphitheatres and Spectacula: A 21st-Century Perspective, BAR International Series 1946, Oxford, 85–94Google Scholar
Wilson, P.R. 1988: ‘The Richborough font: some additional structural detail’, Britannia 21, 411–1210.2307/526212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wilmott and Smither supplementary material

Wilmott and Smither supplementary material

Download Wilmott and Smither supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.4 MB