Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:15:34.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Newly Identified Late Roman Tile Group from Southern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Ian M. Betts  and
Robert Foot
Ian M. Betts
Affiliation:
Museum of London Archaeology Service
Robert Foot
Affiliation:
Archaeology Section, Winchester Museum Service
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During 1981 a large quantity of Roman brick and tile was recovered from excavations at Pudding Lane/118-127 Lower Thames Street, London. Examination of this material revealed a small assemblage of roofing-tile characterised by the presence of red or brown moulding-sand, and unusual rounded tegula flanges. All were made using calcareous clays quite unlike that used for the majority of Roman tile in London. As tile from further sites in London was recorded, more roofing-tile made in the same, or similar, clay types was discovered. From the mid-1980s work outside London has revealed other sites in southern England with tiles made with the same distinctive clay types. They are located over an extremely wide geographical area ranging from Devon in the west to London in the east. Movement of tile from the as yet unidentified tilery was almost certainly by ship along the south coast. The dating of these distinctive tiles is still problematic, although there is now considerable evidence for their use in the late Roman period.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 25 , November 1994 , pp. 21 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Ian M. Betts and Robert Foot 1994. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The tiles from Pudding Lane, Museum of London site code PDN81, were examined by Frances Pritchard.

2 Museum of London Fabric Type 3029.

3 Williams, D.F., A Note of the Petrology of some Late Roman Tiles from Exeter, Devon and Winchester and Southampton, Hampshire, unpublished, undated report, University of Southampton.Google Scholar

4 Museum of London site code LYD88.

5 ibid., IME83.

6 ibid., HL74.

7 D.J. Tomalin, Roman Wight (1987), 113, fig. H30.

8 G. Brodribb, Roman Brick and Tile (1987), 102.

9 Britannia xxii (1991), 290; S. Woodward, The Archaeology of the Chichester District 1991 (1991).Google Scholar

10 Dating information provided by James Kenny, Chichester and District Archaeology Unit, pers. comm.

11 Tomalin, op. cit. (note 7), 104.

12 Tosdevin, Mark. County Archaeological Centre. Carisbrooke, Isle of Wight, pers. comm.: Britannia xx (1989). 319.Google Scholar

13 Ling, R.J., ‘Brading, Brantingham and York: A new look at some fourth-century mosaics’, Britannia xxii (1991). 147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Tomalin, op. cit. (note 7), 25.

15 N. Holbrook and P.T. Bidwell. Roman Finds from Exeter (1991), 281-2, their Fabric Type 4.

16 P.T. Bidwell. The Legionary Bath-house and Basilica and Forum at Exeter (1979), 152, fig. 52,2.

17 ibid., 282, fig. 136.

18 Bird, J. in Miller, L., Schofield, J. and Rhodes, M. (eds), The Roman Quay at St Magnus House, London, LondonMiddlesex Arch. Soc. Special Paper 8 (1986), 139.Google Scholar

19 D. Perring, Roman London (1991), 95.

20 Betts, I.M., Billingsgate (BIG82): Roman Ceramic Building Material, unpublished archive report, Museum of London (1984).Google Scholar

21 Perring, op. cit. (note 19), 102.

22 ibid., 101.

23 Pringle, S., Harp Lane, 16-18 St Dunstans Hill (HL74): Building Material, unpublished archive report, Museum of London (1990).Google Scholar

24 G. Milne, The Port of Roman London (1985), 140.

25 Heathcote, J., ‘Excavation Round-up 1989, Part 1: City of London’, London Archaeologist vi.6 (1990), 160.Google Scholar

26 Crowley, N., The Building Material from Excavations at 15-23 Southwark Street, unpublished archive report, Museum of London (1992).Google Scholar

27 Johnstn, T.,‘ARoman signal station at Shadwell, E.I’, Trans. London Middlesex Arch. Soc. xxvi (1975), 278–80.Google Scholar

28 Tile samples from Shadwell were provided by Mike Stone.

29 Tomalin, op. cit. (note 7), 14-18.

30 Ian Scott, Test Valley Archaeological Trust, pers. comm.

31 Miles, H., ‘The Honeyditches Roman villa, Seaton, Devon’, Britannia viii (1977). 107–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Britannia xxii (1991), 287.Google Scholar

33 R. Foot, The Building Material from Excavations at the Brooks, Winchester, forthcoming.

34 The total weight of the brick and tile assemblage from the Brooks is c. 3700 kg.

35 There are three tile fragments from contexts pre-dating the mid-second century, but these are believed to be later contamination.

36 Dr Sally White, Worthing Museum, pers. comm.

37 At St Magnus House Roman quay a small quantity of calcareous tile was recovered from river-silt deposits in Phase I dated to the early second century (I.M. Betts in Miller, Schofield and Rhodes, op. cit. (note 18), 247-8). It is now clear that these tiles must be either later contamination, or the silt deposits are later in date than originally thought.

38 Holbrook and Bidwell, op. cit. (note 15), 281.

39 ibid., 282.

40 M. Rhodes in Miller, Schofield and Rhodes, op. cit. (note 18), 245.

41 Betts, I.M., General Post Office/ 81 Newgate Street (GPO75): Post-Roman Building Material, unpublished archive report, Museum of London (1991).Google Scholar

42 Crowley, N. and Betts, I.M., ‘Three Classis Britannia stamps from London’, Britannia xxiii (1992), 218–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 W. Williams in B. Philp, The Excavation of the Roman Forts of the Classis Britannica at Dover 1970-1977 (1981), 126-7.

44 Jarrett, M.G. and Mann, J.C., ‘Britain from Agricola to Gallienus’, Bonner Jahrbücher clxx (1970), 178–210.Google Scholar

45 Perring. op. cit. (note 19), 99.

46 Castle, S.A., ‘Excavations at Brockley Hill, Middlesex, Sulloniacae, 1970’, Trans. London Middlesex Arch. Soc. xxiii.2 (1972), 151.Google Scholar

47 Holbrook and Bidwell, op. cit. (note 15), 281.