Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:57:52.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Latin of the New Vindolanda Tablets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2019

J.N. Adams
J.N. Adams*
Affiliation:
All Souls College, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is a detailed study of the language of the writing-tablets from Vindolanda reported on by Bowman et al. in this volume.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 50 , November 2019 , pp. 253 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to the editors of the new tablets, Alan Bowman, David Thomas and Roger Tomlin, for letting me see their work in progress, and for innumerable comments on the content of this article.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, J.N. 1995: ‘The language of the Vindolanda writing tablets: an interim report’, Journal of Roman Studies 85, 86–13410.1017/S0075435800074773Google Scholar
Adams, J.N. 2003: ‘The new Vindolanda writing-tablets’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 53, 530–7510.1093/cq/53.2.530Google Scholar
Adams, J.N. 2013: Social Variation and the Latin Language, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511843433Google Scholar
Adams, J.N. 2016: An Anthology of Informal Latin 200 BC–AD 900, Cambridge10.1017/9781139626446Google Scholar
André, J. 1949: Étude sur les termes de couleur dans la langue latine, ParisGoogle Scholar
André, J. 1985: Les noms de plantes dans la Rome antique, ParisGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C.E. 1910–14: Syntax of Early Latin (2 vols), BostonGoogle Scholar
Bowman, A.K., Thomas, J.D., and Tomlin, R.S.O. 2019: ‘The Vindolanda writing-tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses IV, part 3): new letters of Iulius Verecundus’, Britannia 50Google Scholar
Coleman, K.M. 2012: ‘Bureaucratic language in the correspondence between Pliny and Trajan’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 142, 189–23810.1353/apa.2012.0013Google Scholar
Crawford, M.H. 1996: Roman Statutes (2 vols), LondonGoogle Scholar
Cugusi, P. 1992–2002: Corpus Epistolarum Latinarum papyris tabulis ostracis servatarum (3 vols), FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Cuvigny, H. 2003: La route de Myos Hormos: l'armée romaine dans le désert oriental d’Égypte, Institut français d'archéologie orientale, Fouilles 48/1-2 (2 vols), CairoGoogle Scholar
Dyck, A.R. 2010: Cicero: Pro Sexto Roscio, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gordon, A.E., and Gordon, J.S. 2005: Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum VI.6. fasc. III: Grammatica quaedam erroresque quadratarii et alias rationes scribendi notabiliores, Berlin and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Gradenwitz, O. 1904: Laterculi vocum Latinarum, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Halla-aho, H. 2009: The Non-Literary Latin Letters: A Study of their Syntax and Pragmatics, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Halla-aho, H. 2012: ‘A historical perspective on Latin proleptic accusatives’, De lingua Latina 7 (Revue de linguistique latine du Centre Alfred Ernout, Université Paris-Sorbonne) (available only online)Google Scholar
Heidemann, A. 1893: De Ciceronis in epistulis verborum ellipsis usu, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, J.B., and Szantyr, A. 1965: Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik, MunichGoogle Scholar
Kroll, W. 1929: C. Valerius Catullus (2nd edn; 1st edn 1922, reprinted with addenda 1968), LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Landgraf, G. 1914: Kommentar zu Ciceros Rede Pro Sexto Roscio Amerino (2nd edn), BerlinGoogle Scholar
Leumann, M. 1977: Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre (6th edn), MunichGoogle Scholar
Lodge, G. 1924: Lexicon Plautinum I, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Löfstedt, E. 1956: Syntactica: Studien und Beiträge zur historischen Syntax des Lateins I (2nd edn), II, LundGoogle Scholar
Mynors, R.A.B. 1990: Virgil Georgics, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Norberg, D. 1944: Beiträge zur spätlateinischen Syntax, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, H. 2015: The Oxford Latin Syntax 1, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, H. forthcoming: The Oxford Latin Syntax 2, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Schmeling, G. 2011: A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Stotz, P. 1998: Handbuch zur lateinischen Sprache des Mittelalters IV: Formenlehre, Syntax und Stilistik, MunichGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D.F.S. 1997: Catullus, Toronto, Buffalo and LondonGoogle Scholar
Trappes-Lomax, J.M. 2007: Catullus: A Textual Reappraisal, Swansea10.2307/j.ctvvnbr2Google Scholar
Wölfflin, E., and Meader, H. 1900: ‘Zur Geschichte der Pronomina demonstrativa’, Archiv fur Lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik 11, 369–93Google Scholar
Zainaldin, J.L. forthcoming: Gargilius Martialis: The Agricultural Fragments, CambridgeGoogle Scholar