Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:17:51.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Iron Age and Romano-British Settlement at Woodcock Hall, Saham Toney, Norfolk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Robin A. Brown
Affiliation:
Woodcock Hall, Saham Toney, Norfolk

Extract

The Romano-British settlement at Woodcock Hall, Saham Toney, Norfolk (FIG. I) has been known since the mid-19th century when a local landowner, Thomas Barton of Threxton, donated some artefacts to the Castle Museum in Norwich. The site lies mainly in the parish of Saham Toney, but remains have been found in the adjoining parishes of Threxton and Little Cressingham. The site has not been identified with any place mentioned in the British section of the Antonine Itinerary, but Camboritum, the most likely site, is now thought to refer either to Hockwold-cum-Wilton or to Lackford, although the suggested translation of the name: ‘the ford at the bend of the river’ would suit the Woodcock Hall site well. The site has never been professionally excavated, either wholly or in part.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 17 , November 1986 , pp. 1 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Robin A. Brown 1986. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This paper is based in part on a degree dissertation. Acknowledgements and thanks for assistance are due to the following: Barbara Green & Tony Gregory (Roman and Iron Age material), Graham Webster (Roman military equipment), Richard Reece (Roman coins), Terence Volk and Colin Haselgrove (Celtic coins). Don Mackreth and Richard Hattatt (brooches), Ian Scott (ironwork), Ralph Jackson (Roman bronzework), Miranda Green (cult items) and Robert Kenyon (Claudian coins).

2 Cunliffe, B., Iron Age Communities in Britain (London, 1974), 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem in Cunliffe, B. and Rowley, T. (eds.) Oppida in Barbarian Europe, BAR Suppl. Vol. 11 (1976), 148.Google Scholar

3 W. Rodwell in B. Cunliffe and T. Rowley, op. cit. (note 2), 290.

4 Pennington, W., The History of British Vegetation (London, 1969), 71.Google Scholar

5 Rainbird Clarke, R., East Anglia (London, 1971), 16, 17 and 75.Google Scholar

6 Clarke, D.L., Models in Archaeology (London, 1972), 806.Google Scholar

7 Ravetz, A., Num. Chron. (1965), 15.Google Scholar

8 Allen, D.F., Britannia i (1970), 27.Google Scholar

9 Rodwell, op. cit. (note 3), 211.

10 Haselgrove, C.C. in Burnham, B.C. and Johnson, H.B. (eds.) Invasion and Response BAR 73 (1979), 204.Google Scholar

11 Rodwell, op. cit. (note 3), table 1 on p. 315.

12 Allen, op. cit. (note 8), 22–3.

13 ibid. fig. 8; Gregory, A., Iron Age Coinage in Norfolk (Norwich, 1977), tables 1 & 2.Google Scholar

14 Rodwell, op. cit. (note 3), 215.

15 Allen, op. cit. (note 8), 8.

16 British Museum, R.L. File no. 4615.

17 Robertson, A.S. in Casey, J. and Reece, R. (eds.) Coins and the Archaeologist BAR no. 4 (1974), 19.Google Scholar

18 Boon, G.C. & Hassall, M., The Coins, Inscriptions and Graffiti. Report on the Excavations at Usk 1965–1976 (Cardiff, 1982), 35.Google Scholar

19 From notes prepared by R. Reece for the author in 1981.

20 Perhaps along similar lines to the post-1945 British Army BASVs token currency that was used solely by British military personnel and their dependents in canteens and NAAFIs in the Occupied Zone in Germany.

21 C.F.C. Hawkes, in litt.

22 Mackreth, D.F., Britannia xiii (1982), 310–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar reports on a similar example.

23 Bushe-Fox, J.P., Second Report on the Excavation of the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent (Oxford, 1928)Google Scholar , pl. IV, no. 13.

24 Hull, M.R. in Dudley, D., ‘Excavations on Nor'nour in the Isles of Scilly’, Arch. Journ. cxxiv (1967), 28.Google Scholar

25 Richardson, K.M., Antiq. Journ. xl (1960), 213.Google Scholar

26 Fowler, E., PPS xxvi (1960);Google Scholar see also Jackson, & Ambrose, Britannia ix (1978), 220Google Scholar , fig. 57, No. 8, where it is suggested they may date from the first half of the first century AD.

27 Sheppard, T., Arch. Camb. xcvi (1941)Google Scholar , pl. IVa and VIa.

28 Piggott, S., PPS lii (1950), 12–14, fig. 7, 3Google Scholar

29 Ulbert, G., Das frührömische Kastell Rheingönheim. Limesforschungen IX (Berlin, 1969), Taf. 41, 9Google Scholar ; Ritterling, E., Annalen des Vereins für Nassauische Altertumskunde und Geschichtsforschung xl (1913)Google Scholar , Taf. XV, 77.

30 MacGregor, M., Early Celtic Art in North Britain (Leicester, 1976), 149Google Scholar, no. 29.

31 M. Green in J. Munby and M. Henig (eds.) Roman Life and Art in Britain, BAR No. 41 (1979), 305, pl, 12, VIIIc.

32 Wheeler, R.E.M., London in Roman Times (London, 1930), 108Google Scholar ; Green, M., The Religions of Civilian Roman Britain, BAR No. 24 (1976)Google Scholar , pl. XXII(h).

33 Greene, K. in Burnham, B.C. and Johnson, H.B. (eds.) Invasion and Response, BAR No. 73 (1979), 101.Google Scholar

34 Following Oswald, F., Index of Potters' Stamps on Terra Sigillata (E. Bridgeford 1931).Google Scholar

35 Pointed out in conversation by Ralph Jackson.

36 Frere, S.S. and Joseph, J.K.St., Britannia v (1974)Google Scholar , 40 quoting Ulbert, G., Römische Waffen des I Jahrhunderts n. Chr., (Aalen, 1968).Google Scholar

37 Webster, G., The Roman Imperial Army (London, 1969), 146.Google Scholar

38 Much of this section and the following commentary has been supplied in note form by Dr G. Webster.

39 Curle, J., A Roman Frontier Post and its People (Glasgow, 1911), pl. LXXII.Google Scholar

40 Webster, G., Arch. Journ. cxv (1958), fig. 7, 202.Google Scholar

41 Hawkes, C.F.C. & Hull, M.R., Camulodunum (Oxford, 1947), pl. CII, 8 and p. 337.Google Scholar

42 Curle, op. cit. (note 39), pl. LXXVII, 7.

43 Oldenstein, J., Bericht Rom.-Germ. Kommission lvii (1976), Taf. 34, 268.Google Scholar

44 Ulbert, G., Das frührömische Kastell Rheingönheim, Limesforschungen IX (Berlin, 1969), Taf. 33, 2338Google Scholar ; Taf. 34. 1–44.

45 Brailsford, J.W., Antiquities from Hod Hill in the Durden Collection (London, 1962), i, fig. 5, A118Google Scholar ; E. Künzl, Actes du IVeColloque Int. sur les bronzes antiques (Annales de l'Univ. Jean Moulin) (1977), no. 9.

46 G. Ulbert, op. cit. (note 44), Taf. 34.

47 ibid., Taf. 33, 23–38.

48 McPeake, J.C. & Moore, C.N., Britannia ix (1978), 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 Webster, G., Arch. Journ. cxv (1958), fig. 6, 164.Google Scholar

50 Curle, op. cit. (note 39), pl. LXXIII, 5.

51 Frere & St. Joseph, op. cit. (note 36), fig. 24, nos. 45, 46.

52 Webster, op. cit. (note 49), nos. 19, 30 and 231.

53 ibid. fig. 6, 165.

54 Oldenstein, op. cit. (note 43), Taf. 47, 490–503.

55 Robinson, R., The Armour of Imperial Rome (London, 1975), 176Google Scholar , fig. 182a.

56 Webster, op. cit. (note 49), fig. 6, 166; fig. 7, 175.

57 MacGregor, op. cit. (note 30), fig. 9, 1–8 and 12.

58 Cunliffe, B., Excavations at Fishbourne (Leeds, 1971), fig. 48, 124.Google Scholar

59 Webster, G. in Butler, R.M. (ed.) Soldier and Civilian in Roman Yorkshire (Leicester, 1971)Google Scholar , fig. 16, 84.

60 Ulbert, G., Die römischen Donaukastelle Aislingen und Burghöfe, Limesforschungen (Berlin, 1959), Taf. 18, 26.Google Scholar

61 Hawkes and Hull, op. cit. (note 41), pl. CII, 18–23.

62 I.R. Scott, in litt.

63 Unless otherwise stated the horse on these coins faces to the right.

64 Low silver content as noted by Haselgrove at South Cadbury. Haselgrove, C., ‘The Significance of Coinage in Pre-Conquest Britain’, Invasion and Response, BAR 73 (1979), 197209.Google Scholar

65 Noted by Robert Kenyon.

66 Claudian copies obverse legend all terminate in IMP (when visible); no P.P. terminations so far noted.

67 R.A. Brown, Num. Chron. (1981), Notes, pl. 27B.