Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2011
At the end of a recent die-study of the gold coins of Cunobelin, it was suggested that there might be something to learn from a comparable die-study of the gold coinage of Cunobelin's contemporary, Verica. The index of pre-Roman coins kept by the Institute of Archaeology in Oxford now makes such a task feasible without excessive labour. Thanks are again due to Mr Robert Wilkins of the Institute, for arranging and executing the tedious photography involved.
2 Britannia vi (1975), 1–19.Google Scholar
3 Lyon, S. in Mossop, H. R., The Lincoln Mint (Newcastle upon Tyne, 1970), 16–19.Google Scholar For the original application of this formula, see Biometrika xl, 237–64.Google Scholar
4 The figures given in Britannia vi (1975), 4Google Scholar, appear to be in error. For the staters, the estimated proportion represented by the obverse dies is 79 per cent ± 6 per cent, and by the reverse dies, 66 per cent ± 8 per cent. For the quarter-staters, the proportions represented by the obverse and reverse dies are 73 per cent ± 15 per cent and 46 per cent ± 21 per cent respectively. The original number of staters obverses will have been around 90 and the number of quarter-stater obverse dies around 30, suggesting that a figure of 1,000,000 for the likely number of gold staters or equivalent is still of the right order, at least according to the figures estimated for die-output.
5 Britannia vi (1975), 4–5.Google Scholar
6 Unpublished research for Ph.D. dissertation (C.C.H.). More find-spots are needed.
7 Information from Dr J. P. C. Kent.
8 It is hoped to consider the silver issues of Verica further in a separate article which will analyse them within the wider context of the development of silver currencies in southern England.
9 J. P. C. Kent, ‘The Origin and development of Celtic Gold Coinage in Britain’ (unpublished paper).