Article contents
The Forum of Roman London: Excavations of 1968–9
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2011
Summary
An initial, superficial occupation (Period I, c. A.D. 43) of the site probably reflects a Roman military base of the Conquest period. The first formal layout (Period II, c. 44–50) included a main east-west street, north of which lay a metalled area and two wooden structures separated by a north-south road, again almost certainly part of a military base. A large scale Claudian redevelopment (Period III, c. 50–60) relaid both the east-west road and the metalled area. In the angle formed by these lay at least three large timber-framed buildings, on an east-west axis and probably consisting of ranges of rooms, at least one frontal verandah and two semi-basements; two of these buildings were divided from the third by a minor east-west road. The framed walls were infilled with wattle, daub or brick, over wooden sleeper-plates supported on trenched piles. The floors were of clay, some roofs tiled and many walls painted, one four times. Water was piped along the principal road. The layout, still reminiscent of military work, probably reflects the initiation of the civilian town east of the Walbrook which set the permanent street-pattern for the eastern half of the city. All the buildings on the site were destroyed by the Boudiccan fire of A.D. 60.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © B. J. Philp 1977. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies
References
1 Abbreviations used in the text: finds are referred to by their appended specialist-report numbers as Coins (Coin Nos.), samian (Sam. Nos.), coarse pottery (CP Nos.), and small finds (SF Nos.) to encompass both those illustrated and not. Sections and layers are referred to as S and L respectively. F indicates a feature on the plan and ER indicates the museum excavationregister number.
2 Marsden, P., London Archaeologist i (1968), 3Google Scholar.
3 Marsden, P., Trans. London & Middlesex Arch. Soc. xxi (1967), 194Google Scholar.
4 Philp, B. J., Kent Archaeol. Review, 16 (1969), 4Google Scholar.
5 For explanation of these symbols see p. 3, note 1.
6 D. R. Dudley and G. Webster, The Rebellion of Boudicca (1962), p. 100.
7 Dunnett, B. R. K., Arch. Journ. cxxiii (1967), 27Google Scholar.
8 Identified by Mr F. G. Dimes, of the Institute of Geological Sciences, as ‘a coarse-grained ferruginous sandstone… possibly from the Folkestone Beds division of the lower greensand’.
9 Dunning, G. C., Antiq. Journ. xxv (1945), 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar, cf. Merrifield, op. cit. (note 11), 90, fig. 9.
10 Frere, S. S., Verulamium Excavations i (1972), 23Google Scholar.
11 R. Merrifield, The Roman City of London (1965), 138.
12 Cottrill, F.; JRS xxv (1935), 215Google Scholar.
13 A. Oswald, Notes in Guildhall Museum.
14 Cottrill, F.; JRS xxvi (1936), 254Google Scholar.
15 Hodge, H., in Royal Commission on Hist. Mon., London (Roman), iii (1928), 36Google Scholar.
16 Marsden, P., Trans. London & Middlesex Arch. Soc. xxii (1969), 18Google Scholar.
17 Penn, W. S., Arch. Cant., lxxi (1957), 53Google Scholar.
18 Kölner Jahrb. Vor- und Frühgeschichte (1967–8), 86.
19 See note 13.
20 J. Wacher, Towns of Roman Britain (1975), 42–6.
21 R. Merrifield, op. cit. (note 11), 136.
22 R. Merrifield, op. cit. (note 11), 140.
23 Johnson, T., Trans. London & Middlesex Arch. Soc. xxiv (1973), 58Google Scholar.
24 Bushe-Fox, J. P., Excavations of the Roman Fort at Richborough, iv (1949), 26Google Scholar.
25 Frere, S. S., Verulamium Excavations i (1972), 6Google Scholar.
26 Dunnett, R., Arch. Journ. cxxiii (1966), 31Google Scholar.
27 P. Crummy, in this volume of Britannia.
28 S. S. Frere, Britannia, A History of Roman Britain (1967), 248.
29 Down, A., Britannia iv (1973) 320Google Scholar.
30 Drury, P., Current Archaeology 41 (1973), 173Google Scholar.
31 JRS xliii (1953), 105Google Scholar.
32 Britannia v (1974), 30Google Scholar.
33 R. Merrifield, The Roman City of London (1965), Gazetteer Nos. 290, 343, 344.
34 Hurst, H., Antiq. Journ. lii (1972), 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
35 J. Wacher, Towns of Roman Britain (1975), 399.
36 R. Merrifield, op. cit. (note 33), 138 and fig. 23.
37 J. Wacher, op. cit. (note 34), 91.
38 I. A. Richmond, Roman Britain (1955), 74.
39 Marsden, P., Trans. London & Middlesex Arch. Soc. xxvi (1975) 1–102Google Scholar.
40 D. Atkinson, Excavations at Wroxeter, 1923–7 (1942).
41 Wacher, J. S., Antiq. Journ. xliv (1964), 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
42 J. J. Wilkes, Dalmatia (1969), 370.
43 Annals xiv, 33.
44 R. Merrifield, The Roman City of London (1965), fig 24.
45 Marsden, P., Trans. London & Middlesex Arch. Soc. xxii (1969), 16Google Scholar.
46 See note 15.
47 Norman, P., Archaeologia lx (1907), 222Google Scholar.
48 See note 41.
49 See note 40.
50 Joyce, J. G., Archaeologia xlvi (1881), 352Google Scholar.
51 Frere, S. S., Antiq. Journ. xxxix (1959), 2Google Scholar.
52 Dawson, G., London Archaeologist I, No. 7 (1970), 156Google Scholar. For a more recent discussion see R. Merrifield and H. Sheldon, ibid., II No. 8 (1974).
53 Frere, S. S., Britannia ii (1971), 6Google Scholar.
54 See note 50.
55 Ashby, T., Archaeologia lxi (1909), 569Google Scholar.
56 RCHM, London (Roman) iii (1928), 42Google Scholar.
57 C. F. Hawkes and M. R. Hull, Camulodunum (1947), 222.
58 Marsden, P., Trans. London & Middlesex. Arch. Soc. xxvi (1975), 83Google Scholar, No. 52.
59 M. H. Callender, Roman Amphorae (1965), No. 1370 (3a).
60 P. Marsden, op. cit. (note 58), 80, No. 12.
61 B. J. Philp, Excavations in West Kent 1960–70 (1973), 59.
62 Bushe-Fox, J. P., Excavations of the Roman Fort at Richborough i (1926), 86Google Scholar, No. 8.
- 7
- Cited by