We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
A recently proposed alternative name for Roman-period Malton/Norton is challenged and a location for the previously unidentified site of Praetorio is offered.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ant. Itin.: Antonine Itinerary, in Itineraria Romana I (ed. O. Cuntz, Leipzig, 1929)Google Scholar
Creighton, J.1988: ‘The place names of East Yorkshire in the Roman period’, in Price, J. and Wilson, P.R. (eds), Recent Research in Roman Yorkshire, BAR British Series 193, Oxford, 387‒406Google Scholar
Margary, I.D.1973: Roman Roads in Britain (3rd edn), LondonGoogle Scholar
Ordnance Survey2011: Roman Britain: Historical Map, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
Ottaway, P.2013: Roman Yorkshire. People, Culture and Landscape, PickeringGoogle Scholar
ND: Notitia Dignitatum (ed. O. Seeck, Berlin, 1876)Google Scholar
RIB: Collingwood, R.G., and Wright, R.P. (with Tomlin, R.S.O.) 1995: The Roman Inscriptions of Britain. I. Inscriptions on Stone (new edn), StroudGoogle Scholar
Rivet, A.L.F.1970: ‘The British section of the Antonine Itinerary’, Britannia1, 34‒82Google Scholar
Rivet, A.L.F., and Smith, C.1979: The Place-Names of Roman Britain, LondonGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.H.1937: The Place-Names of the East Riding of Yorkshire and York, English Place-Names Society 14, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Stevens, C.E.1940: ‘The British sections of the “Notitia Dignitatum”’, Archaeological Journal97, 125‒54Google Scholar
Wenham, L.P., and Heywood, B.1997: The 1968 to 1970 Excavations in the Vicus at Malton, North Yorkshire, Yorkshire Archaeological Report 3, LeedsGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P.2006: ‘A Yorkshire “small town”: Roman Malton and Norton reviewed’, Yorkshire Archaeological Journal78, 35‒60Google Scholar