* The drawings are by Marion E. Cox, except for FIGS. 2, Nos. 8–9; 5, No. 19; 6, Nos. 22, 24, 26; 7, Nos. 28, 30–32; 10, No. 43, which are by George B. Rogers.

¹ Britannia iii (1972), 1–55.Google Scholar

² Labrousse, M., Gallia xxii (1964), 469; xxvi (1968), 554–55; xxviii (1970), 427, on Cajarc near Gaillac; 435, on a Montans poinçon (D. 743 = O. 1393, already well-known on La Graufesenque bowls); xxx (1972), 499–500, on an early type of Dr. 37 made at Cajarc.Google Scholar

³ Durand-Lefebvre, , ‘Etude sur les vases de Montans du Musée Saint-Raymond de Toulouse’, Gallia iv (1946), 137–94, cited hereafter as D-L, Gallia iv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴ Durand-Lefebvre, , ‘Etude sur la décoration des vases de Montans’, Gallia xii (1954), 73–88, cited hereafter as D-L, Gallia xii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Oxé, A. and Comfort, H., Corpus Vasorum Arretinorum. A Catalogue of the Signatures, Shapes and Chronology of Italian Sigillata (Bonn 1968). For early discoveries at Lyons see A. Audin and M. Leglay, Bull. Soc. Nat. des Antiquaires de France (1966), 95–109Google Scholar; for Lezoux see Vertet, H., Revue Arch, ii (1967), 255–86.Google Scholar

⁶ Rossignol, Bull. Monumental (1862), 701–22; also (1859) and (1861) but these are short articles; his best publication concerned the discoveries of M. de Saint Sauveur across the river, see Revue Arch, du Midi i (1866–1868), 108–10, with two full-page plates, one of thirty-six ovolos, and the other of the kiln.Google Scholar

⁷ D-L, Gallia iv, 182, No. 234 (11120) is a mould-fragment with an illegible cursive signature from ‘the Lartet Collection’. By the kindness of M. M. Labrousse, I examined most of the moulds in the Musée Saint-Raymond.Google Scholar

⁸ D-L, Gallia iv, 178, No. 212 (10792); Déchelette i, 303, No. 200; Oswald, 334.Google Scholar

⁹ Identified by Mr. G. B. Rogers and myself in 1966, by the kindness of Madame Chirol, le Conservateur. Mr. Rogers informs me that there are three sherds of Rheinzabern ware in the museum at Monaco, which have the impossible provenance of a local hill-fort. It is probable that these sherds were bought from a nineteenth-century dealer in antiquities from Germany, and thus have no real provenance. For Kaufmann moulds see Garbsch, J., Bayerische Vorgeschichts- blätter 31 (1966), 108–22.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Schönberger, H., Berichten v. de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheid. Bodemond., 12/13 (1962/1963), 577–8, on a Kaufmann mould, illustrated by J. A. Trimpe Burger, Ibid. 10/11 (1960–61), 555–61; examples are noted in museums at Munich, Koln, Strasbourg, Darmstadt, Mannheim and Mainz. There are four fine specimens in the reserves of the Cabinet des Medailles, Paris, identified by Professor Comfort, to whom I owe these references.Google Scholar

¹¹ My thanks are due to M. Ch. Gendron, Fontenay-le-Comte; M. L. Valensi, Bordeaux; M. P. Barousse, Montauban, for their kind help.

¹² H. Ricken and Ch. Fischer, Die Bilderschüsseln der romischen Topfer von Rheinzabern (1942), Taf. 256, d, (1963) Text.

¹³ D-L, Gallic iv, 181, No. 219 (10791) for the name-stampGoogle Scholar, Gallia xii, 73–88, fig. 3, 5, for the mould.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Oxé, , Jahrb. des K. Deut. Arch. Inst., Arch. Anzeiger xxix (1914), col. 61–76 (not mentioned by Durand-Lefebvre).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Oxé—Comfort (note 5).

¹⁶ Especially, Comfort, ‘Late Ateius Signatures’, RCRF Ada iv (1962), 5–25.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Ettlinger, , RCRF Acta iv (1962), 27–44. See also Hofmann, B., Ogam xx (1968), 157–74.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Wells, C. M., The German Policy of Augustus (Oxford, 1972), 253–66; see especially 257–62, and 188–92.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Martin, T., Revue Arch, du Centre 13 (1974), 123–43, especially 142, figs. 3, 8, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁰ Déchelette i (1904), 288, frag, de mould 37; D-L, Gallia xii, fig. 5, 2.Google Scholar

²¹ Oxé (note 14), col. 74, Abb. 5, 13. M. Labrousse has illustrated this mould in Les Dossiers de l'Archéologie, No. 9, Céramique en Gaule Romaine (Dijon 1975), 63.

²² Knorr, Töpfer und Fabriken T-S des ersten Jahrhunderts (1919), 66, Taf. 62.

²³ Oswald, Index (1931), 227, repeated 411. He mistakenly stated that PARA/TVSF was in a circle.

²⁴ Montans: Rossignol Collection, Musée Saint-Raymond (28.256, 27.0791). Information, and readings of the stamps kindly provided by Brenda Dickinson and Brian Hartley.

²⁵ D-L, Gallia iv, No. 33, is a small ansate stamp reading CEL, but there is no certainty that this is the same potter. The form is Dr. 27, not Ritterling 8, Mr. Hartley informs me, see Oswald, 370.Google Scholar

²⁶ I have not seen it, but I wish to thank Professor Comfort for photographs. Oxé (1914), Abb. 5, 17; Déchelette i, 268, No. 57; D-L, Gallia iv, 152, No. 44.Google Scholar

²⁷ Gallia xxiv (1966), 412–15; xxvi (1968), 517–21; xxviii (1970), 398–402; xxix (1971), 73–108; xxx (1972), 472–76. These are preliminary notes on vast quantities of stratified moulds and bowls and plain forms except for the 1971 report on the outsize jug.Google Scholar

²⁸ Oxé, Bonner Jahrb. 140/141 (1936), 325–94, reviewing Hermet's book.

²⁹ Knorr (note 22), 90, Taf. 95 K, at Zürich; and (1952) Taf. 1 A, at Nijmegen: probably made at La Graufesenque; and Oxé (note 14), Abb. 4, from Trier, probably likewise.

³⁰ Hermet, F., La Graufesenque (Paris 1934).Google Scholar

³¹ Oxé, Frühgallische Reliefgefässe Vom Rhein (1934, reissued 1968), 26–7, Taf. xii, 48, a, b; 54, a, b; and later he added (note 28 above) 377, that Taf. vi, 26 has the same frieze as the Dr. 29 stamped A.C.V.T.I.M at Pleshybury, May, T., Trans. Essex Arch. Soc. xiv (1918), 227–32, and Oswald and Pryce, pl. xxvi, 6.Google Scholar

³² Lacroix, , Revue du Tarn vi (Albi 1887), 82, 121–2, 216–18, and nine plates of drawings.Google Scholar

³³ Balsan, , Revue Arch. du Centre ix (1970), 99–109; for the two-line stamps, see pl. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁴ Gallia xxx (1972), 474, fig. 6, for two Augustan prototype Dr. 29s.Google Scholar

³⁵ Pryce, T. Davies, JRS xxix (1934), 92–94; 231–4.Google Scholar

³⁶ Lacroix (note 32), pl. vi, ‘Inscriptions des vases de Montans (Col. de M. Lacroix à Lisle)’. Déchelette i, 131, note; 247, No. 4, 1.

³⁷ Rogers, in Rogers and Lloyd, Gallo-Roman Pottery from Southampton, City Museum Publication, No. 6 (1966), 10, fig. 2, 39.

³⁸ T. Martin (note 19), fig. 1, No. 11, and fig. 5; D-L, Gallia iv, No. 71 (11001).

³⁹ G. Simpson, in B. W. Cunliffe (ed.), Fifth Report on the Excavations at Richborough, Kent. Society of Antiquaries Research Report xxiii, 1968.

⁴⁰ Hartley (note 1), 45.

⁴¹ Rossignol Manuscript, final list of ninety-nine potters' stamps and signatures, mentions FLORI, from his pl. 97.

⁴² D-L, Gallia iv, No. 229 (1114).Google Scholar

⁴³ Ruth Steiger, ‘Tafel zur Farbbezeichnung röm. Keramik’, in Ettlinger and Steiger, Formen und Farbe röm. Keramik (Augst 1971).

⁴⁴ A sharply carinated 29/37 with a cordon lisse, from Lezoux, was found at Richborough: op. cit. (note 39), 153, 24. No. 25 can also now be identified as Lezoux fabric.

⁴⁵ Mayet, , Actes du xxi^e Congrès d'etudes régionales (Bayonne 1971), 7–19.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Bushe-Fox, , Richborough iii (1932), 115, pl. XXIX, 1.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Ibid., 117, pl. xxx, 1, from a large deposit of material dated c. 80–130.

⁴⁸ G. Emard and B. Hofmann, Forum 2 (Touring Club de France 1972), 11–13.

⁴⁹ Op. cit. (note 39), 155, pl. LXXXIII, 35.

⁵⁰ M. Bats, Sciences, Lettres et Arts de Pau (1971), 29–61, pl. 4, 55.

⁵¹ Hartley, op. cit. (note 1), 42–45.

⁵² Martin, ‘L'ensemble gallo-romain de Valery’, SCA 9 (1972), fig. 1.

⁵³ Macdonald, , Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot. lxiii (1928–1929), 504, 514, fig. 80, 51.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Op. cit. (note 39), 156, pl. LVIII, 37.

⁵⁵ Miller, S. N., The Roman Fort at Balmuildy (Glasgow 1922).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Bushe-Fox, , Third Report on the Excavations at Wroxeter, 1914 (Society of Antiquaries Research Report iv (1916), 43, pl. xxvi, 2.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Hartley, in Frere, Verulamium Excavations i (Society of Antiquaries Research Report xxviii (1972)), 248, fig. 95, D91. The La Graufesenque kind of split-tongue ovolo, Ibid., 223, D14, has the tongue on the left of the ovolo; and Hermet, pl. 35 bis, 4, has no central projection.

⁵⁸ Accession Nos. 27.511 and 27.878, Mus. Toulouse.

⁵⁹ Miller, S. N., The Roman Fort at Old Kilpatrick (Glasgow 1928), pl. XII, 9. See also Hofmann (note 74), for D. 324 at Banassac.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Mary Larrieu, in Etienne and Larrieu, Tauroboles, Lampes et Céramiques Romaines du Musée de Lectoure (Auch 1966), figs. 3, 6, and 4, 13.

⁶¹ Francoise Mayet (note 45), fig. 15.

⁶² Stanfield, , Arch. Journ. lxxxvi (1930), 118, fig. 2.Google Scholar

⁶³ Dunning, G. C., with illustrations by Stanfield, Antiq. Journ. xxv (1945), 66, fig. 8, 4.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Hartley (note 1), 43–45.

⁶⁵ Stanfield, , Arch. Journ. xcii (1936), 106, fig. 3, 7, from the Bank of England, London.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ P. Cadenat, Fosse 7, No. 9; with the same ovolo as Fosse 6, 1, and Fosse 11, 12 (publication forthcoming).

⁶⁷ Bats (note 50), 54, pl. 7, 117.

⁶⁸ Martin (Note 19), 126, 129, fig. 1, 8.

⁶⁹ D-L, Gallia iv, 182, No. 232 (10958); No. 231 (10959).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Vertet, , Gallia xx (1962), 412–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷¹ Oswald, 105–6.

⁷² Tilhard, J. L., Rev. Arch. du Centre xi (1972), 327–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for excellent illustrations, but following D-L, Gallia iv, 155, No. 56 for dating.Google Scholar

⁷³ Green, Kevin, RCRF Acta xiv–xv (1972–1973), 48–54, gives full references to small moulded cups.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Hofmann, , RCRF Acta xiii (1971), 5–20, including comments on Florus (5). See also note 59 above.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Knorr, Rottenburg (1910), Taf. 3, 2 and 4.