Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:35:53.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classification and Analysis of Archaeological Contexts for the Reconstruction of Early Romano-British Cremation Funerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2010

Jake Weekes
Jake Weekes
Affiliation:
Classical and Archaeological Studies, University of Kent, jake.weekes @kent.gov.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reassesses analytical categories commonly used to reconstruct the ‘funerary sequence’ of cremation and associated deposition in early Roman Britain, looking in particular at pre-pyre and pyre activity, burial, and other forms of primary deposition. In order to develop a clearer picture of the actual contexts of ceremonial performance and installation, and even to begin to disentangle the manifold meanings these events would have held for original participants, it is first necessary to refine a ‘forensic’ approach to the data, remaining constantly aware of how our own assumptions about funerary behaviour can heavily influence what we think we see in the archaeological record.

Keywords

ROMANO-BRITISH COASTAL TRADEROMAN PORTROMAN SMALL TOWNTRANS-SHIPMENTWETLANDSSOMERSETSEVERN ESTUARY
Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 39 , November 2008 , pp. 145 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Jake Weekes 2008. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alcock, J. 1980: ‘Classical religious belief and burial practice in Roman Britain’, Arch. Journ. 137, 50–85Google Scholar
Barber, B., and Bowsher, D. 2000: The Eastern Cemetery of Roman London: Excavations 1983–1990, MoLAS Monograph 4, LondonGoogle Scholar
Bennett, P. et al. 1984: ‘Crundale Limeworks 1984: Archive’ housed at Canterbury Archaeological TrustGoogle Scholar
Bennett, P. 1987: ‘Cranmer House, London Road’ in Frere, S.S., Bennett, P., Rady, J. and Stow, S., Canterbury Excavations: Intra- and Extra-Mural Sites, 1949–55 and 1980–84, Maidstone, 56–73Google Scholar
Biddulph, E. 2002: ‘One for the road? Providing food and drink for the final journey’ Archaeologia Cantiana 122, 101–11Google Scholar
Biddulph, E. 2005: ‘Last orders: choosing pottery for funerals in Roman Essex’ Oxford Journal of Archaeology 24 (1), 23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, E.W. 1987: ‘Romano-British burial customs and religious beliefs in South-East England’ Arch. Journ. 143, 201–39Google Scholar
Campbell, G. 2004: ‘Charcoal and other charred plant remains’ in Cool 2004, 267–70Google Scholar
Cool, H.E.M. 2004: The Roman Cemetery at Brougham, Cumbria. Excavations 1966–67, Britannia Monograph 21, LondonGoogle Scholar
Davis, D., and de Moulins, D. 2000: ‘The plant remains’ in Barber and Bowsher 2000, 368–79Google Scholar
Diack, M. 2003: St Dunstans Terrace, Canterbury, Stratigraphic Report Report, unpub. client report, The Canterbury Archaeological TrustGoogle Scholar
Downes, J. 1999: ‘Cremation: a spectacle and a journey’ in Downes, J. and Pollard, T. (eds), The Loved Body's Coruption. Archaeological Contributions to the Study of Human Mortality, Glasgow, 19–29Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, A.P. 1997: Archaeological Excavations on the Route of the A27 Westhampnett Bypass, West Sussex. Volume 2: the Late Iron Age, Romano-British, and Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries, Wessex Archaeology, Report 12, SalisburyGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, A.P. 2000: ‘Ritual, sequence, and structure in Late Iron Age mortuary practices in north-West Europe’ in Pearce, Millet and Struck 2000, 15–29Google Scholar
Gaitzsch, W., and Werner, A. 1993: ‘Rekonstruktion einer Brandbestattung vom Typ Bustum aufgrund archäologischer Befunde aus Siedlungen der Jülicher Lössbörde’ in Struck 1993a, 55–67Google Scholar
Gejvall, N.G. 1963: ‘Cremations’, in Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. (eds), Science in Archaeology, London, 379–90Google Scholar
Hicks, A.J. 1998: ‘Excavations at Each End, Ash 1992’ Archaeologia Cantiana 118, 91–172Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1999: The Archaeological Process, LondonGoogle Scholar
Jessup, R.F. 1955: ‘Excavations of a Roman barrow at Holborough, Snodland’, Archaeologia Cantiana 68, 1–68Google Scholar
Jones, R.F.J. 1982: Cemeteries and Burial Practice in the Western Provinces of the Roman Empire, unpub. PhD thesis, University of London: Institute of ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Kopytoff, I. 1986: ‘The cultural biography of things: commoditization as a process’ in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge, 64–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, A. 2000: ‘Functional and conceptual archaeobotanical data from Roman cremations’, in Pearce, Millett and Struck 2000, 45–51Google Scholar
Lindsay, W.M. (ed.) 1965: Sexti Pompei Festi: de verborum significatu quae supersunt cum Pauli epitome, HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Mackinder, A. 2000: A Romano-British Cemetery on Watling Street. Excavations at 165 Great Dover Street, Southwark, London, MoLAS Archaeology Studies 4, LondonGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J.I. 1989: ‘Cremations: expectations, methodologies and realities’ in Roberts, C.A., Lee, F. and Bintliff, J. (eds), Burial Archaeology: Current Research, Methods and Developments, BAR British Series 211, Oxford, 65–76Google Scholar
McKinley, J.I. 1994a: The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham Part VIII: The Cremations, East Anglian Archaeology 69, GressenhallGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J.I. 1994b: ‘A pyre and grave goods in British cremation burials: have we missed something?’ Antiquity 68, 132–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J.I. 1994c: ‘Bone fragment size in British cremation burials and its implications for pure technology and ritual’, Journal of Archaeological Science 21, 339–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J.I. 1997: ‘The cremated human bone from burials and cremation related contexts’ in Fitzpatrick 1997, 55–72Google Scholar
McKinley, J.I. 2000a: ‘Phoenix rising; aspects of cremation in Roman Britain’ in Pearce, Millett and Struck 2000, 38–44Google Scholar
McKinley, J.I. 2000b: ‘Cremated human remains’, in Barber and Bowsher 2000, 61–7Google Scholar
McKinley, J.I. 2004: ‘The human remains and aspects of pyre technology and cremation rituals’, in Cool 2004, 283–309Google Scholar
Metcalf, P., and Huntington, R. 1992: Celebrations of Death: the Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Mould, Q. 2004: ‘The iron nails’, in Cool 2004, 271–2Google Scholar
Niblett, R. 2000: ‘Funerary rites in Verulamium during the early Roman period’, in Pearce, Millett and Struck 2000, 97–104Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. 1999: The Archaeology of Death and Burial, StroudGoogle Scholar
Parry, J.P. 1994: Death in Banaras, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. 1997: ‘Death and Time: the structure of Late Iron Age mortuary ritual’, in Gwilt, A. and Haselgrove, C. (eds), Reconstructing Iron Age Societies. New Approaches to the British Iron Age, Oxbow Monograph 71, Oxford, 174–80Google Scholar
Pearce, J. 1998: ‘From death to deposition: the sequence of ritual in cremation burials of the Roman period’, in Forcey, C., Hawthorne, J. and Witcher, R. (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference Nottingham 1997, Oxford, 99–111Google Scholar
Pearce, J. 1999: Case Studies in a Contextual Archaeology of Burial Practice in Roman Britain, unpub. PhD thesis, department of Archaeology, university of DurhamGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. 2000: ‘Burial, society and context in the provincial Roman world’, in Pearce, Millett and Struck 2000, 1–12Google Scholar
Pearce, J. 2002: ‘Ritual and interpretation in provincial Roman cemeteries’, Britannia 33, 373–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, J., Millett, M., and Struck, M. (eds) 2000: Burial, Society and Context in the Roman World, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Philpott, R.A. 1991: Burial Practices in Roman Britain: a Survey of Grave Treatment and Furnishing AD 43–410, BAR British Series 219, Oxford.Google Scholar
Plomely, N.J.B. (ed.) 1966: Friendly Mission. The Tasmanian Journals and Papers of George Augustus Robinson, 1829– 1834, Tasmanian Historical Research AssociationGoogle Scholar
Polfer, M. 2000: ‘Reconstructing funerary rituals: the evidence of ustrina and related archaeological structures’, in Pearce, Millett and Struck 2000, 30–7Google Scholar
Reece, R. 1988: My Roman Britain, CirencesterGoogle Scholar
Struck, M. (ed.) 1993a: Römerzeitliche Gräber als Quellen zu Religion Bevölkerungstruktur und Sozialgeschichte, Archäologische Schriften des Instituts für Vor-und Frühgeschichte der Johannes Gutenberg-Universistät Mainz. Band 3, MainzGoogle Scholar
Struck, M. 1993b: ‘Busta in Britannien und ihre Verbindungen zum Kontinent. Allgemeine Überlegungen zur Herleitung der Bestattungssitte’, in Struck 1993a, 81–94Google Scholar
Swift, E. 2003: ‘Transformations in meaning: amber and glass beads across the Roman frontier’, in Carr, G., Swift, E. and Weekes, J. (eds), Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference. Canterbury 2002, Oxford, 48–57Google Scholar
Toynbee, J.M.C. 1971: Death and Burial in the Roman World, London and SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
Tuffreau-Libre, M. 2000: ‘Pottery assemblages in Gallo-Roman cemeteries’, in Pearce, Millett and Struck 2000, 52–60Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1977 [1967]: The Forest of Symbols. Aspects of Ndembu Ritual, LondonGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. 2004: ‘Wood preserved by iron nails’, in Cool 2004, 272–3Google Scholar
Weekes, J. 2005a: Styles of Romano-British Cremation and Associated Deposition in South-East England, unpub. PhD thesis, University of KentGoogle Scholar
Weekes, J. 2005b: ‘Reconstructing syntheses in Romano-British cremation’, in Bruhn, J., Croxford, B. and Grigoropoulos, D. (eds), TRAC 2004, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference. Durham 2004, Oxford, 16–26Google Scholar
Wells, C. 1960: ‘A study of cremation’, Antiquity 34, 29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, N.C.C. 2007: ‘atering for the cultural identities of the deceased in Roman Britain: potential and problems’, in Croxford, B., Ray, N., Roth, R. and White, N. (eds), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference. Cambridge 2006, Oxford, 115–32Google Scholar
Wigg, A. 1993: ‘Zu Funktion und deutung der Aschengruben’, in Struck 1993a, 111–16Google Scholar
Williams, H.M.R. 2004: ‘Potted histories — cremation, ceramics and social memory in early Roman Britain’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 23 (4), 417–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar