Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:09:16.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Analysis of Hunt Cups and Allied Wares from Britain*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

A. Anderson ,
M. G. Fulford ,
H. Hatcher  and
A. M. Pollard
A. Anderson
Affiliation:
Dept. of Archaeology, University of Leicester
M. G. Fulford
Affiliation:
Dept. of Archaeology, University of Reading
H. Hatcher
Affiliation:
Research Lab. for Archaeology and the History of Art, 6 Keble Road, Oxford
A. M. Pollard
Affiliation:
Research Lab. for Archaeology and the History of Art, 6 Keble Road, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The results of the chemical analysis indicate that the majority of the unknown sherds tested were not manufactured in the Nene Valley and that there is a strong probability that Köln was the major source with only about 16 per cent being attributed to the Nene Valley. The possibility of a further source or sources is also indicated by the sub-group of Köln A. In addition analysis of the Nene Valley control sherds has shown no distinction between the products of Water Newton, Sibson and Stibbington, but some evidence for discrimination in the case of Stanground.

Although Gaulish samian accounts for most of the pottery table-ware found in Britain, Gaul and Germany in the first and second centuries A.D., its repertoire was supplemented by a range of colour-coated drinking vessels. These are generally in different fabrics to those of contemporary samian (ranging from white through to various shades of brown) and are generally finished in a variety of slips, which are usually reduced. The pre-Flavian range of drinking vessels of this kind found in Britain has recently been the subject of a detailed study. Now the colour-coated drinking wares of the later first and second century are beginning to receive attention. During this period the bag-shaped beaker with cornice rim is one of the most popular forms (FIG. I, 1-4) and is frequently found in a fine white paste with a reduced slipped surface. Decoration may be by roughcasting or, particularly from the mid-second century, barbotine or rouletting. During the period concerned (i.e. late first to the end of the second century) vessels of this kind were made at several workshops in Britain, Gaul and Germany. The kilns of the lower Nene Valley, for example, are usually credited with being the source of bag-beakers in a white fabric and decorated with hunting scenes enbarbotine, (often described as Castor ware in earlier British and continental reports after Artis) (FIG. 1, 3-4). However, kilns in Köln produced vessels in a similar form and fabric with roughcast and barbotine decoration (FIG. 1, 1-2) as, it seems, did workshops at Lezoux in Central Gaul and, no doubt, further workshops await discovery.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 13 , November 1982 , pp. 229 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © A. Anderson, M. G. Fulford, H. Hatcher and A. M. Pollard 1982. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Greene, K., Report on the Excavations at Usk 1965-76: The Pre-Flavian Fine Wares (Cardiff, 1979)Google Scholar.

2 Anderson, A. C., A Guide to Roman Fine Wares, VORDA (Highworth, Wiltshire, 1980)Google Scholar; Greene, K. in Taylor, J. du Plat and Cleere, H. (eds), Roman Shipping and Trade: Britain and the Rhine Provinces, CBA Res. Rep. 24 (London, 1978), 52–8Google Scholar; Greene, K. in Arthur, P. and Marsh, G. (eds), Early Fine Wares in Roman Britain, British Arch. Reps 57 (Oxford, 1978), 15–30Google Scholar.

3 Howe, M. D., Perrin, J. R. and Mackreth, D. F., Roman Pottery from the Nene Valley: A Guide (City Museum, Peterborough, 1981), 8, fig. 3Google Scholar.

4 Artis, E. T., The Durobrivae of Antoninus identified and illustrated in a series of plates exhibiting the excavated remains of that Roman station in the vicinity of Castor, Northants. (London, 1828), pl. liv, no. 4Google Scholar.

5 Binsfeld, W., Kölner Jahrbuch für Vor- und Frühgeschichte vii (1964), 19–32Google Scholar.

6 Greene, in Arthur and Marsh, op. cit. (note 2), 17-18.

7 Greene, in du Plat Taylor and Cleere, op. cit. (note 2), 53.

8 Binsfeld, op. cit. (note 5).

9 Hatcher, H., Hedges, R. E. M., Pollard, A. M. and Kenrick, P. M., Archaeometry xxii (1980), 133–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Wishart, D., CLUSTAN User Manual Version 1C Release 2 (University of Edinburgh, 1978)Google Scholar; Dixon, W. J. and Brown, M. B. (eds), Biomedical Computer Programs P-series (University of California, 1979)Google Scholar.

11 e.g. Bieber, A. M. Jr, Brooks, D. W., Harbottle, G. and Sayre, E. V., Archaeometry xviii (1976), 59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 An early first-century A.D. lamp fragment from Lungengasse, Köln; perhaps of Italian origin.

13 Binsfeld, op. cit. (note 5).

14 Hull, M. R., The Roman Potters Kilns of Colchester, Rep. Res. Committee Soc. Ant. London 21 (Oxford, 1963), form 391Google Scholar.

15 Pers comm. R. Perrin.

16 Anderson, op. cit. (note 2), form 3.

17 idem, form 4.

18 There is insufficient space to record the complete table of results for these and the remaining samples. Further information about these and the precise context of the sherds (where known) can be supplied by the authors.

19 Anderson, op. cit. (note 2), forms 3 and 4.

20 Stanfield, J. A. and Simpson, G., Central Gaulish Potters (Oxford, 1958), figs. 25-6Google Scholar.

21 Anderson, op. cit. (note 2), form 2.

22 idem, form 4.

23 Greene, in Arthur and Marsh, op. cit. (note 2), 17-18.

24 Greene, op. cit. (note 1).

25 Greene, in du Plat Taylor and Cleere, op. cit. (note 2), 53-6; idem, in Arthur and Marsh, op. cit. (note 2), 18-19.