Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T19:29:52.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Interim Report on the Excavation of the Orsett ‘Cock’ Enclosure, Essex: 1976–79

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

H. S. Toller
H. S. Toller
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The rectangular multivallate enclosure at TQ 6535 8135 has been sampled by excavation and described previously. Further excavation by Essex County Council was undertaken for the Department of the Environment when road construction threatened total destruction. Evidence for settlement was found, which began in the early or middle Iron Age, continued until the late Roman period and was also present in the early Saxon period, FIG. I shows the major features that have been excavated or denned; FIGS. 2 and 3 indicate substantive features during each period.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 11 , November 1980 , pp. 35 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © H. S. Toller 1980. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rodwell, W. J., Essex Archaeol. Hist. Ser. 3 vi (1974), 13–39Google Scholar; Hedges, J. and Buckley, D., Proc. Prehist. Soc. xliv (1978), 224Google Scholar, fig. 1 and fig. 4, site B.

2 Drury, P. in Cunliffe, B. and Rowley, T. (edd.), Lowland Iron Age communities in Europe, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Int. Ser. (Supp.) 48 (London, 1978), 45–8.Google Scholar

3 Rodwell, op. cit. (note 1), 19–21, fig. 4: F1.

4 Evans, J. G. and Limbrey, S., Proc. Prehist. Soc. xl (1974), 170–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Drury, op. cit. (note 2), 56; Drury, P. J., Excavations at Little Waltham, 1970–71, C.B.A. Research Rep. 26 (London, 1978), 122–23.Google Scholar

6 Drury, op. cit. (note 2), 54–6; Drury, op. cit. (note 5), 119–22.

7 Jackson, D. A. and Ambrose, T. M., Britannia ix (1978), 134, 172Google Scholar; Goodburn, R., Britannia ix (1978), 442Google Scholar; Wilson, D. R., Britannia iv (1973), 294, 305.Google Scholar

8 W. J. Rodwell in Cunliffe and Rowley, op. cit. (note 2), 39–41.

9 Rodwell, op. cit. (note 1), 25: ditch F2 (north side).

10 Rodwell, op. cit. (note 1), 35; Rodwell, W. in Bowen, H. G. and Fowler, P. J. (ed.), Early Land Allotment, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. (Oxford, 1978), 90Google Scholar; Drury, P. J. and Rodwell, W. in Buckley, D. (ed.), The Archaeology of Essex to A.D. 1500, C.B.A. Res. Rep. 34 (London, 1980), forthcoming.Google Scholar

11 Rodwell, op. cit. (note 1), 20.

12 Rodwell, W. J., Essex Archaeol. Hist. Ser. 3 ii (1970), 338–39Google Scholar; Dunnett, R., The Trinovantes (London, 1975), 41Google Scholar; Rodwell, W. J., Panorama: Journal of the Thurrock Local History Soc. xiv (1971), 43–4.Google Scholar

13 The site appears on a map of the periphery of early Roman London, in the Museum of London, as a Roman fort.

14 H. S. Toller, East Anglian Archaeology, forthcoming.

15 Collingwood, R. G. and Richmond, I., The Archaeology of Roman Britain (London, 1969), 29.Google Scholar

16 Drury and Rodwell, op. cit. (note 10), forthcoming.

17 Dunning, G. C. in Harding, D. W. (ed.), Hillforts: later Prehistoric earthworks in Britain and Ireland (London, 1976), 76–118.Google Scholar

18 Jobey, G., Arch. Ael. Ser. 4 xliii (1965), 21–64.Google Scholar The author wishes to acknowledge the help of the site supervisors Percival Turnbull, Simon Ellis and Kevin Blockley and all the staff of the Planning Dept., Essex County Council.