Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:00:11.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Quantification and Interpretation of Ceramic Building Material (CBM) Assemblages in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

Peter Warry
Peter Warry*
Affiliation:
Cheltenham, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantification of assemblages of ceramic building material (CBM) is now normal excavation practice, but there is insufficient standardisation of methodology and little study of the validity or uses of these analyses. Consequently, it is difficult to interpret confidently the resulting analyses or make comparisons between sites. This paper suggests a simple approach and tests its validity empirically in urban environments where the high level of constructional churn should generate assemblage homogeneity. It then shows how the results can help with site and building interpretation.

Keywords

CBMquantificationrecyclingGloucester
Type
Shorter Contributions
Information
Britannia , Volume 51 , November 2020 , pp. 348 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © The Author, 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, L., Atherton, K., and Booth, P. 2001: ‘Ceramic building material’, in Booth, P.M., Evans, J. and Hiller, J., Excavations in the Extramural Settlement of Roman Alchester, Oxfordshire, 1991, Oxford Archaeology Monograph 1, Oxford, 253–60Google Scholar
Archaeological Ceramic Building Materials Group 2002: Ceramic Building Material: Minimum Standards for Recovery, Curation, Analysis and Publication, https://www.archaeologicalceramics.com/uploads/1/1/9/3/11935072/ceramic_building_material_guidelines.pdf (accessed February 2020)Google Scholar
Brodribb, G. 1987: Roman Brick and Tile, StroudGoogle Scholar
Cleverley, C. 2004: ‘Roman roof tile and brick’, in Dalwood, H. and Edwards, R., Excavations at Deansway, Worcester, 1988–89: Romano-British Small Town to Late Medieval City, Council for British Archaeology Research Report 139, York, 339–42Google Scholar
Fulford, M. 2000: ‘Synthesis’, in Fulford, M. and Timby, J., Late Iron Age and Roman Silchester: Excavations on the Site of the Forum-Basilica 1977, 1980–86, Britannia Monograph 15, London, 545–81Google Scholar
Fulford, M.G., and Clarke, A. 2011: Silchester: The City in Transition. The Mid-Roman Occupation of Insula IX, c. AD 125–250/300: A Report on Excavation Undertaken since 1997, Britannia Monograph 25, LondonGoogle Scholar
Heighway, C.M., and Parker, A.J. 1982: ‘The Roman tilery at St Oswald's Priory, Gloucester’, Britannia 13, 25–7710.2307/526488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, J. 2018: Archaeological Excavation on the Site of the Proposed Magistrates Court, Ladybellegate St., Gloucester, May to August 1995, unpub. report, Gloucestershire County CouncilGoogle Scholar
Martin, T.S. 1999: ‘The Roman tile’, in Connor, A. and Buckley, R., Roman and Medieval Occupation in Causeway Lane, Leicester: Excavations 1980 and 1991, Leicester Archaeology Monograph 5, Leicester, 301–4Google Scholar
Poole, C., and Shaffrey, R. 2011: ‘Roman ceramic building material’, in Ford, B.M. and Teague, S., Winchester: A City in the Making. Archaeological Excavations between 2002 and 2007 on the Sites of Northgate House, Staple Gardens and the Former Winchester Library, Jewry St, Oxford Archaeology Monograph 12, Oxford, 290–3Google Scholar
Pringle, S. 2009: ‘The ceramic building materials’, in Howard-Davis, C., The Carlisle Millennium Project: Excavations in Carlisle, 1998–2001 2: The Finds, Lancaster, 887–902Google Scholar
Timby, J. 2000: ‘The ceramic tile’, in Fulford, M. and Timby, J., Late Iron Age and Roman Silchester: Excavations on the Site of the Forum-Basilica 1977, 1980–86, Britannia Monograph 15, London, 116–22Google Scholar
Wacher, J. 1995: The Towns of Roman Britain, LondonGoogle Scholar
Warry, P. 2006: Tegulae: Manufacture, Typology and Use in Roman Britain, BAR British Series 417, Oxford10.30861/9781841719566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warry, P. 2011: ‘The ceramic building material’, in Fulford, M.G. and Clarke, A., Silchester: The City in Transition. The Mid-Roman Occupation of Insula IX, c. AD 125–250/300: A Report on Excavation Undertaken since 1997, Britannia Monograph 25, London, 220–9Google Scholar
Warry, P. 2012: ‘The Silchester tile industry’, in Fulford, M. (ed.), Silchester and the Study of Romano-British Urbanism, Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 90, Portsmouth, RI, 49–75Google Scholar
Warry, P. 2013: ‘An assessment of the tegulae and imbrices’, in Cunliffe, B., The Roman Villa at Brading, Isle of Wight: The Excavations of 2008–10, Oxford University School of Archaeology Monograph 77, Oxford, 148–52Google Scholar
Warry, P. 2015: Ceramic Building Material from Nine Archaeological Excavations in the City of Gloucester, Cotswold Archaeology Report 15585a, unpub. report, CirencesterGoogle Scholar
Warry, P. 2017: ‘Production, distribution, use and curation: a study of stamped tile from Gloucestershire’, Britannia 48, 77–11510.1017/S0068113X1700023XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warry, P. 2018a: ‘Ceramic building material’, in Hoyle, J., Archaeological Excavation on the Site of the Proposed Magistrates Court, Ladybellegate St., Gloucester, May to August 1995, unpub. report, Gloucestershire County Council, 49–73Google Scholar
Warry, P. 2018b: ‘Ceramic building material’ in Hart, J. and Mudd, A., Cannington Bypass, Somerset: Excavations in 2014: Middle Bronze Age Enclosure at Rodway and Roman Villa at Sandy Lane, Cotswold Archaeology Monograph 10, Cirencester, 79–82Google Scholar