Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:14:36.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mosaics and Room Function: the Evidence from some Fourth-century Romano-British Villas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Patricia Witts
Patricia Witts
Affiliation:
Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The mosaics of fourth-century Romano-British villas constitute a rich but relatively neglected resource. In this paper, I propose to demonstrate how figured pavements can provide indications of the function of the rooms they decorated.

Hitherto, an approach to the identification of different types of room using mosaics as a prime indicator is one that has not been fully utilised. Major studies of the Roman villa are valuable in their own right but barely touch upon room function. Some important and still-cited articles have concentrated on form rather than function. Other studies have focused upon social aspects of the villa. In recent years comments have been made about how decoration can be used to differentiate space but with little reference to mosaics. As against those studies which hint at the use of mosaics but do not make much of them, Thébert has produced a seminal work addressing function, architecture and decoration, especially mosaics, showing that many illuminating deductions can be made.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 31 , November 2000 , pp. 291 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Patricia Witts 2000. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Åkerström-Hougen, G. 1974: The Calendar and Hunting Mosaics of the Villa of the Falconer in Argos, StockholmGoogle Scholar
Allison, P.M. 1992: ‘The relationship between wall-decoration and room-type in Pompeian houses: a case study of the Casa della Caccia Antica’, JRA 5, 235–49Google Scholar
Ashby, T. 1902: ‘Excavations at Caerwent, Monmouthshire, on the site of the Romano-British city of Venta Silurum, inm 1901’, Arch. 58 Part 1, 119–52Google Scholar
Aubrey, J.: Monumenta Britannica, Bodleian Library, Oxford, MS Top. Gen. C25Google Scholar
Beeson, A.J. 1994: ‘Orpheus rediscovered’, Minerva Vol. 5 No. 3, 12–15Google Scholar
Bek, L. 1983: ‘Cuestiones Convivales: the idea of the triclinium and the staging of convivial ceremony from Rome to Byzantium’, Anal/Rom 12, 81–107Google Scholar
Bidwell, P., and Speak, S. 1994: Excavations at South Shields Roman Fort I, Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar
Black, E.W. 1987: The Roman Villas of South East England, BAR 171, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulleid, A., and Horne, E. 1926: ‘The Roman house at Keynsham, Somerset’, Arch. 75, 109–35Google Scholar
Clarke, G. 1982: ‘The Roman villa at Woodchester’, Britannia 13, 197–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J.R. 1991: The Houses of Roman Italy 100BC-AD 250:Ritual, Space, and Decoration, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Cookson, N.A. 1990: ‘The mosaic remains’, in Wrathmell and Nicholson 1990, 146–50Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1971: Excavations at Fishbourne 1961–1969, Reports Res. Comm. Soc. Antiqs 26, LondonGoogle Scholar
D'Arms, J.H. 1991: ‘Slaves at Roman convivia’, in Slater 1991, 171–83Google Scholar
Davey, N., and Ling, R. 1982: Wall-Painting in Roman Britain, GloucesterGoogle Scholar
Dilke, O.A.W. 1989: Mathematics and Measurement, LondonGoogle Scholar
Dunbabin, K.M.D. 1978: The Mosaics of Roman North Africa — Studies in Iconography and Patronage, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Dunbabin, K.M.D. 1991: ‘Triclinium and stibadium’ in Slater 1991, 121–48Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K.M.D. 1996: ‘Convivial spaces: dining and entertainment in the Roman villa’, JRA 9, 66–80Google Scholar
Dupont, F. 1992: Daily Life in Ancient Rome, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, E. 1991: ‘The Pompeian atrium house in theory and practice’, in Gazda 1991, 25–48Google Scholar
Ellis, S.P. 1988: ‘The end of the Roman house’, AJA 92, 565–76Google Scholar
Ellis, S.P. 1991: ‘Power, architecture and decor: how the Late Roman aristocrat appeared to his guests’, in Gazda 1991, 117–34Google Scholar
Ellis, S.P. 1995: ‘Classical reception rooms in Romano-British houses’, Britannia 26, 163–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, S.P. 1997: ‘Late-antique dining: architecture, furnishings and behaviour’, in Laurence and Wallace-Hadrill 1997, 41–51Google Scholar
Farioli Campanati, R. (ed.) 1983: Atti del III Colloquio Internazionale sul Mosaico Antico II, RavennaGoogle Scholar
Farrar, R.A.H. 1956: ‘The Frampton “villa”, Maiden Newton’, in ‘Archaeological fieldwork in Dorset in 1956’, PDNHAS 78, 81–3Google Scholar
Farrer, J. 1866: ‘Notice of recent excavations in Chedworth Wood on the estate of the Earl of Eldon, in the County of Gloucester’, PSAS 6, 278–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frere, S.S. 1982: ‘The Bignor villa’, Britannia 13, 135–95Google Scholar
Frere, S.S. 1983: Verulamium Excavations II, Reports Res. Comm. Soc. Antiqs. 41, LondonGoogle Scholar
Gale, T. 1709: Antonini Iter BritanniarumGoogle Scholar
Gazda, E.K. (ed.) 1991: Roman Art in the Private Sphere, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Goodburn, R. 1979: The Roman Villa, Chedworth, The National Trust, LondonGoogle Scholar
Grahame, M. 1997: ‘Public and private in the Roman house: the spatial order of the Casa del Fauno’, in Laurence and Wallace-Hadrill 1997, 137–64Google Scholar
Henig, M. 1984: ‘James Engleheart's drawing of amosaic at Frampton 1794’, PDNHAS 106, 143–6Google Scholar
Henig, M. 1986: ‘ita intellexit numine inductus tuo: some personal interpretations of deity in Roman religion’, in Henig, M. and King, A. (eds), Pagan Gods and Shrines of the Roman Empire, Oxford Uni v. Comm. Arch. monograph 8, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Henig, M. 1995: The Art of Roman Britain, LondonGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R.C. 1832: The Pitney Pavement Discovered by Samuel Hasell Esq. of Littleton, AD 1828, and Illustrated from his Notes, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jesnick, I.J. 1990: ‘The Caerwent seasons mosaic — perhaps an Orpheus?’ Mosaic 17, 7–13Google Scholar
Jesnick, I.J. 1997: The Image of Orpheus in Roman Mosaic, BAR Int. Ser. 671, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. 1983: ‘The mosaics of Bignor Roman villa, England: a Gallo-Roman connection’, in Farioli Campanati 1983, 405–10Google Scholar
Jones, C.P. 1991: ‘Dinner theatre’, in Slater 1991, 185–98Google Scholar
Kondoleon, C. 1995: Domestic and Divine — Roman Mosaics in the House of Dionysos, IthacaGoogle Scholar
Laurence, R., and Wallace-Hadrill, A. (eds) 1997: Domestic Space in the Roman World: Pompeii and Beyond, Portsmouth, RIGoogle Scholar
Lavin, I. 1962: ‘The House of the Lord’, Art Bulletin 44, 1–27Google Scholar
Ling, R. 1991: ‘Brading, Brantingham and York: a new look at some fourth-century mosaics’, Britannia 22, 147–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysons, S. 1797: An Account of Roman Antiquities Discovered at Woodchester in the County of Gloucester, LondonGoogle Scholar
Lysons, S. 1813: Reliquiae Britannico-Romanae I, LondonGoogle Scholar
Lysons, S. 1817a: Reliquiae Britannico-Romanae III, LondonGoogle Scholar
Lysons, S. 1817b: ‘Account of the remains of a Roman villa, discovered at Bignor, in Sussex, in the years 1811, 1812, 1813, 1814 and 1815’, Archaeologia. 18, 203–21Google Scholar
McKay, A.G. 1975: Houses, Villas and Palaces in the Roman World, LondonGoogle Scholar
Meates, G.W. 1951: ‘The Lullingstone Roman villa’, Arch. Cant. 63, 1–49Google Scholar
Meates, G.W. 1979: The Roman Villa at Lullingstone, Kent, MaidstoneGoogle Scholar
Painter, K.S. 1968: ‘The Roman site at Hinton St Mary, Dorset’, BMQ 32, 15–31Google Scholar
Perci val, J. 1976: The Roman Villa, LondonGoogle Scholar
Phelps, W. 1836: The History and Antiquities of Somersetshire I, LondonGoogle Scholar
Price, J.E., and Price, F.G.H. 1881: A Description of the Remains of Roman Buildings at Morton, near Brading, Isle of Wight, LondonGoogle Scholar
Procter, W. 1855: ‘An account of the excavations of the remains of a Roman villa near Collingham’, Procs Yorks. Phil. Soc. I, 270–81Google Scholar
Putnam, W.G., and Rainey, A. 1972: ‘Fourth interim report on excavations at Dewlish Roman villa, 1972, and on the mosaic in Room 11’, PDNHAS 95, 81–6Google Scholar
Putnam, W.G., and Rainey, A. 1976: ‘Seventh interim report on excavations at Dewlish Roman villa, 1975’, PDNHAS 97, 54–7Google Scholar
Rahtz, P.A. 1963: ‘A Roman villa at Dovvnton’, WAM 58, 303–41Google Scholar
Rivet, A.L.F. (ed.) 1969: The Roman Villa in Britain, LondonGoogle Scholar
Rossiter, J. 1991: ‘Convivium and villain late antiquity’, in Slater 1991, 199–214Google Scholar
Russell, J. 1985: ‘The Keynsham Roman villa and its hexagonal triclinia’, Bristol & Avon Archaeology 4, 6–12Google Scholar
Russell, J. 1992: ‘The Roman villa at Newton St Loe’, Bristol & Avon Archaeology 9, 2–23Google Scholar
Scott, S. 1991: ‘An outline of a new approach for the interpretation of Romano-British mosaics’, Journal of Theoretical Archaeology 1, 29–35Google Scholar
Scott, S. 1993: ‘A theoretical framework for the study of Romano-British villa mosaics’, in Scott, E. (ed.), Theoretical Roman Archaeology: First Conference Proceedings, Aldershot, 103–14Google Scholar
Scott, S. 1997: ‘The power of images in the late-Roman house’, in Laurence and Wallace-Hadrill 1997, 53–67Google Scholar
Slater, W.J. (ed.) 1991: Dining in a Classical Context, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Smith, D.J. 1977: ‘Mythological figures and scenes in Romano-British mosaics’, in Munby, J. and Henig, M. (eds), Roman Life and Art in Britain, BAR 41(i), Oxford, 105–93Google Scholar
Smith, D.J. 1978: ‘Regional aspects of the winged corridor villa in Britain’, in Todd 1978, 117–47Google Scholar
Smith, J.T. 1978: ‘Villas as a key to social structure’, in Todd 1978, 149–85Google Scholar
Stanton, G.R. 1936: ‘The Newton St Loe pavement’, JRS 26, 43–6Google Scholar
Stead, I.M. 1970: ‘A Roman villa at Whatley Combe, Nunney, Somerset’, PSANHS 114, 37–47Google Scholar
Stead, I.M. 1980: Rudston Roman Villa, LeedsGoogle Scholar
Thébert, Y. 1987: ‘Private life and domestic architecture in Roman Africa’, in Veyne, P. (ed.), A History of Private Life I — From Pagan Rome to Byzantium, Cambridge, MA, 313–409Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1981: Christianity in Roman Britain to AD 500, LondonGoogle Scholar
Todd, M. (ed.) 1978: Studies in the Romano-British Villa, LeicesterGoogle Scholar
Tomalin, D.J. 1987: Roman Wight — A Guide Catalogue, Newport, IoWGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, J.M.C. 1981: ‘Apollo, beasts and seasons: some thoughts on the Littlecote mosaic’, Britannia 12, 1–5Google Scholar
Van Aken, A.R.A. 1949: ‘Late Roman domus architecture’, Mnemosyne, 242–51Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1988: ‘The social structure of the Roman house’, PBSR 56, 43–97Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1994: Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Walters, B. 1982: ‘Mosaics in architectural context: some reinterpretations’, Mosaic 6, 12–15Google Scholar
Walters, B. 1983: ‘The “Orpheus” mosaic in Littlecote Park, England’, in Farioli Campanati 1983, 433–42Google Scholar
Webster, G. 1983: ‘The function of Chedworth Roman “Villa”’, TBGAS 101, 5–20Google Scholar
Witts, P.A. 1995a: ‘The lost mythological figures mosaic from Pitney, Somerset’, JBAA 148, 1–5Google Scholar
Witts, P.A. 1995b: ‘The Rudston small figures mosaic’, East Riding Archaeological Society News 42 (March 1995), 7–11 [Reprinted in Mosaic 26 (1999), 4–5]Google Scholar
Wrathmell, S., and Nicholson, A. (eds) 1990: Dalton Parlours — Iron Age Settlement and Roman Villa, WakefieldGoogle Scholar