Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:58:31.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The maintenance of friendships after severe traumatic brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2020

Tennille Bertram ,
Leanne Togher ,
Emma Power  and
Jacinta Douglas Open the ORCID record for Jacinta Douglas [Opens in a new window]
Tennille Bertram*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Leanne Togher
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Emma Power
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Jacinta Douglas
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this qualitative study was to understand processes involved in the maintenance and development of friendships after a person sustains a traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Method:

Four people with severe TBI from rural settings in Australia identified one-to-two friends to be interviewed. A total of nine friends participated in a semi-structured interview. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data was analyzed using principles of grounded theory.

Results:

The overall conceptualisation that emerged from the data described the process of friends actively placing themselves within the friendship with the person with TBI. Two major processes were evident which enabled friends to actively place themselves within the friendship. They were (1) making sense of the TBI and its consequences and (2) maintaining normality in the friendship.

Conclusions:

Friendships can be maintained following a TBI when friends actively place themselves within the friendships. Friends are able to do this when they make sense of the TBI and its consequences and maintain normality. There are a variety of ways that friends achieve this.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injuryfriendscognitive-communicationqualitative
Type
Articles
Information
Brain Impairment , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 79 - 91
Copyright
© Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, G. (1989). Friendship: Developing a sociological perspective. Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Allan, G. (1998). Friendship, sociology and social structure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(5), 685–702. doi: 10.1177/0265407598155007.Google Scholar
Amati, V., Meggiolaro, S., Rivellini, G., & Zaccarin, S. (2018). Social relations and life satisfaction: The role of friends. Genus, 74(1), 7. doi: 10.1186/s41118-018-0032-z.Google Scholar
Birks, M. & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
Bogart, E., Togher, L., Power, E., & Docking, K. (2012). Casual conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury and their friends. Brain Injury, 26(3), 221–233. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.648711.Google Scholar
Castleberry, A. (2014). NVivo 10 [software program]. Version 10. QSR International; 2012. Alexandria, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, 78, 1.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Charon, J. M. (2007). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623–630. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Di, B. A., Godfrey, C., Soo, C., Catroppa, C., & Anderson, V. (2014). ‘In my before life’: Relationships, coping and post-traumatic growth in adolescent survivors of a traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(10), 975–983. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1883.Google Scholar
Douglas, J., & Spellacy, F. J. (2000). Correlates of depression in adults with severe traumatic brain injury and their carers. Brain Injury, 14, 71–88. doi: 10.1080/026990500120943.Google Scholar
Finset, A., Dyrnes, S., Krogstad, J. M., & Berstad, J. (1995). Self-reported social networks and interpersonal support 2 years after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 9(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699059509008187 Google Scholar
Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Helps, Y., Henley, G., & Harrison, J. (2008). Hospital separations due to traumatic brain injury, Australia 2004–05. Adelaide, South Australia: Injury Research and Statistics Series.Google Scholar
Hines, M. A. (2009). Living with autism: A narrative analysis of older parents’ experiences. University of Sydney. Discipline of Speech, Pathology. Dissertation.Google Scholar
Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks: Concepts, theories, and findings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laxe, S., Zasler, N., Selb, M., Tate, R., Tormos, J. M., & Bernabeu, M. (2013). Development of the international classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for traumatic brain injury: An International consensus process. Brain Injury, 27(4), 379–387. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.750757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, J., & Kosciulek, J. (2014). Social interactions of individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Rehabilitation, 80(2), 21–29.Google Scholar
Oddy, M., & Humphrey, M. (1980). Social recovery during the year following severe head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 43(9), 798–802. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.43.9.798.Google Scholar
Oddy, M., Humphrey, M., & Uttley, D. (1978). Subjective impairment and social recovery after closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 41(7), 611–616. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.7.611.Google Scholar
Prutting, C. A., & Kirchner, D. M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 52(2), 105–119. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5202.105.Google Scholar
Shorland, J., & Douglas, J. M. (2010). Understanding the role of communication in maintaining and forming friendships following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 24(4), 569–580. doi: 10.3109/02699051003610441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struchen, M. A., Pappadis, M. R., Sander, A. M., Burrows, C. S., & Myszka, K. A. (2011). Examining the contribution of social communication abilities and affective/behavioral functioning to social integration outcomes for adults with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26(1), 30–42. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182048f7c.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Togher, L., Power, E., Rietdijk, R., McDonald, S., & Tate, R. (2012). An exploration of participant experience of a communication training program for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Disability & Rehabilitation, 34(18), 1562–1574. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.656788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J. (1955). The ethics of Aristotle : The Nichomachean ethics translated/J.A.K. Thomson. (Penguin classics; L55). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Uehara, E. (1990). Dual exchange theory, social networks, and informal social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 521–557. doi: 10.1086/229571.Google Scholar
WHO (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar