Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:38:45.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applying a Biopsychosocial Perspective to Investigate Factors Related to Emotional Adjustment and Quality of Life for Individuals With Brain Tumour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Tamara Ownsworth*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Griffith Institute for Health and Medical Research, Griffith University, Australia. [email protected]
Anna L. Hawkes
Affiliation:
Viertel Centre for Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Council Queensland, Australia; School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Australia.
Suzanne Chambers
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Griffith Institute for Health and Medical Research, Griffith University, Australia; Viertel Centre for Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Council Queensland, Australia.
David G. Walker
Affiliation:
Briz Brain and Spine Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia.
David Shum
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Griffith Institute for Health and Medical Research, Griffith University, Australia.
*
*Address for correspondence: Tamara Ownsworth, PhD, School of Psychology. Griffith University, Mt Gravatt Campus, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

Objective: This exploratory study applied a biopsychosocial perspective to investigate cognitive and psychosocial factors related to emotional adjustment and QoL after brain tumour. Methods: Participants included 30 adults with a brain tumour (60% benign and 40% malignant) who were aged 28 to 71 years (M = 51.5, SD = 12.3) and on average 5.4 years post-diagnosis (SD = 5.6 years). Participants completed a brief battery of cognitive tests and self-report measures of emotional status (Depression, Anxiety Stress Scale), subjective impairment (Patient Competency Rating Scale), coping (COPE), social support (Brief Social Support Questionnaire), and QoL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy — Brain Tumour [FACT-Br]). Results: QoL was significantly associated with global cognitive ability (r = .49, p < .01), subjective impairment (r = .66, p < .01), and satisfaction with support (r = .50, p < .05). Level of depressive symptoms was significantly correlated with premorbid IQ (r = -.49, p < .01), use of planning to cope (r = -.48, p < .01), and satisfaction with support (r = -.47, p < .01). Conclusions: Overall, these exploratory findings indicate that emotional adjustment and QoL after brain tumour is related to a slightly different pattern of neuropsychological, psychological (self-perceptions and coping) and social factors. The clinical implications for interventions with individuals with brain tumour are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)