Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:42:25.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adolescent Performance on The Awareness of Social Inference Test: TASIT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Skye McDonald ,
Alana Fisher ,
Leanne Togher ,
Robyn Tate ,
Jacqueline Rushby ,
Therese English ,
Michelle Kelly ,
Danielle Mathersul ,
Francesca Froreich  and
Heather Francis
Skye McDonald*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Alana Fisher
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Leanne Togher
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Robyn Tate
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Jacqueline Rushby
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Therese English
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Michelle Kelly
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Danielle Mathersul
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Francesca Froreich
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Heather Francis
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Professor Skye McDonald, School of Psychology, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia, 2052. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Primary objective: Social cognition underlies social skills and can be disrupted in numerous developmental and acquired brain disorders during childhood and adolescence. Despite this, there are few tools to assess social cognition clinically in this age group. This study examined adolescent performance on The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT), a valid measure of social cognition in adults.

Design: Cross-sectional design examining performance on Parts 1, 2 and 3 of TASIT (and alternate forms) in Australian girls and boys with varying levels of English familiarity.

Methods: 665 schoolchildren from private and government schools were administered TASIT subtests. Of these, 464 students aged 13–15 were selected to provide normative data. Scores from a further 97 provided information about the effects of lack of English familiarity.

Results: The two Forms of TASIT were statistically equivalent for two of the three parts. Adolescents performed lower than adults, although the differences were not large. Some incremental effects were seen for chronological age. Gender effects were apparent on all subtests. Lack of English familiarity (i.e., English not spoken at home) reduced scores a further 6–13% relative to high English proficiency.

Conclusions: TASIT appears to be suitable for adolescents. Norms are best aggregated across ages in adolescence and stratified according to gender.

Keywords

adolescencesocial cognitionThe Awareness of Social Inference Testnormative data
Type
Articles
Information
Brain Impairment , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , May 2015 , pp. 3 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, D.C.: APA.Google Scholar
Anderson, V., Beauchamp, M.H., Yeates, K.O., Crossley, L., Hearps, S.J.C., & Catroppa, C. (2013). Social competence at 6 months following childhood traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19 (05), 539–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child's theory of mind: a case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 30, 285–297.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 38 (7), 813–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29 (5), 407–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001a). The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ Test revised version: A study with normal adults and adults with Aspergers Syndrome or high functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Spong, A., Scahill, V., & Lawson, J. (2001b). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5, 1–58.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, M., & Anderson, V. (2010). SOCIAL: An integrative framework for the development of social skills. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 39–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, M., Dooley, J.J., & Anderson, V. (2013). A preliminary investigation of moral reasoning and empathy after traumatic brain injury in adolescents. Brain Injury, 27, 896–902.Google Scholar
Blake, M.L. (2009). Inferencing processes after right hemisphere brain damage: Maintenance of inferences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 359–372.Google Scholar
Blakemore, S.J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 267–277.Google Scholar
Blakemore, S.J., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 47, 296–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosacki, S.L. (2000). Theory of mind and self-concept in preadolescents: Links with gender and language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (4), 709–717.Google Scholar
Bowers, D., Blonder, L.X., & Heilman, K.M. (1991). Florida Affect Battery. Centre for Neuropsychological Studies, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL.Google Scholar
Bowers, L., Huisingh, R., & LoGiudice, C. (2010). Social Language Development Test – adolescent manual. East Moline, Illinois: LinguiSystems.Google Scholar
Brune, M. (2005). Emotion recognition, ‘theory of mind,’ and social behavior in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 133 (2–3), 135–147.Google Scholar
Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Comprehensive assessment of spoken language. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Services.Google Scholar
Choudhury, S., Blakemore, S.-J., & Charman, T. (2006). Social cognitive development during adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1 (3), 165–174.Google Scholar
Couture, S.M., Penn, D.L., Losh, M., Adolphs, R., Hurley, R., & Piven, J. (2010). Comparison of social cognitive functioning in schizophrenia and high functioning autism: more convergence than divergence. Psychological Medicine, 40, 569–579.Google Scholar
Couture, S.M., Penn, D.L., & Roberts, D.L. (2006). The functional significance of social cognition in schizophrenia: A review. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32 (Suppl. 1), S44–S63.Google Scholar
Demorest, A., Meyer, C., Phelps, E., Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1984). Words speak louder than actions: Understanding deliberately false remarks. Child Development, 55 (4), 1527–1534.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Agostino, A., Taylor, H.G., Bigler, E.D., Rubin, K., Vannatta, K., . . . Yeates, K.O. (2013). Emotional expression and socially modulated emotive communication in children with traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19 (01), 34–43.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Barnes, M.A., Wilkinson, M., & Humphreys, R.P. (1998). How children with head injury represent real and deceptive emotion in short narratives. Brain and Language, 61 (3), 450–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, M., Lockyer, L., & Lazenby, A.L. (2000). How high-functioning children with autism understand real and deceptive emotion. Autism, 4 (4), 370–381.Google Scholar
Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., . . . Smarsh, B. (1996). Children's understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development, 67 (6), 3071–3085.Google Scholar
Di Martino, A., Ross, K., Uddin, L.Q., Sklar, A.B., Castellanos, F.X., & Milham, M.P. (2009). Functional brain correlates of social and nonsocial processes in autism spectrum disorders: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 63–74.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Jackson, H.J., & Pattison, P.E. (2002). Emotion recognition via facial expression and affective prosody in schizophrenia: A methodological review. Clinical Psychology Review, 22 (6), 789–832.Google Scholar
Fournier, N.M., Calverley, K.L., Wagner, J.P., Poock, J.L., & Crossley, M. (2008). Impaired social cognition 30 years after hemispherectomy for intractable epilepsy: The importance of the right hemisphere in complex social functioning. Epilepsy and Behavior, 12, 460–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, C., Lough, S., Stone, V., Erzinclioglu, S., Martin, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hodges, J.R. (2002). Theory of mind in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: Theoretical and practical implications. Brain, 125 (4), 752–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanten, G., Cook, L., Orsten, K., Chapman, S.B., Li, X., Wilde, E.A., . . . Levin, H.S. (2011). Effects of traumatic brain injury on a virtual reality social problem solving task and relations to cortical thickness in adolescence. Neuropsychologia, 49 (3), 486–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happe, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24 (2), 129–154.Google Scholar
Hughes, C., & Dunn, J. (1998). Understanding mind and emotion: Longitudinal associations with mental state talk between young friends. Developmental Psychology, 34 (5), 1026–1037.Google Scholar
Jellesma, F.C., Rieffe, C., Meerum Terwogt, M., & Westenberg, M. (2009). Do I feel sadness, fear or both? Comparing self-reported alexithymia and emotional task performance in children with many or few somatic complaints. Psychology and Health, 24, 881–893.Google Scholar
Johnston, L., Miles, L., & McKinlay, A. (2008). A critical review of the Eyes Test as a measure of social-cognitive impairment. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60, 135–141.Google Scholar
Kern, R.S., Green, M.F., Fiske, A.P., Kee, K.S., Lee, L., Sergi, M J., . . . Nuechterlein, K.H. (2009). Theory of mind deficits for processing counterfactual information in persons with chronic schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 39, 645–654.Google Scholar
Keulers, E.H.H., Evers, E.A.T., Stiers, P., & Jolles, J. (2010). Age, sex, and pubertal phase influence mentalizing about emotions and actions in adolescents. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35 (5), 555–569.Google Scholar
Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P., Rogers, R.L., & Chissom, B.S. (1975). Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8–75. Chief of Naval Technical Training, Naval Air Station Memphis.Google Scholar
Kipps, C.M., Nestor, P.J., Acosta-Cabronero, J., Arnold, R., & Hodges, J.R. (2009). Understanding social dysfunction in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: The role of emotion and sarcasm processing. Brain, 132, 592–603.Google Scholar
Kolb, B., Wilson, B., & Taylor, L. (1992). Developmental changes in the recognition and comprehension of facial expression: Implications for frontal lobe function. Brain and Cognition, 20 (1), 74–84.Google Scholar
Kosmidis, M.H., Aretouli, E., Bozikas, V.P., Giannakou, M., & Ioannidis, P. (2008). Studying social cognition in patients with schizophrenia and patients with frontotemporal dementia: Theory of mind and the perception of sarcasm. Behavioural Neurology, 19, 65–69.Google Scholar
Lee, N.C., Krabbendam, L., White, T.P., Meeter, M., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., . . . Shergill, S.S. (2013). Do you see what I see? Sex differences in the discrimination of facial emotions during adolescence. Emotion, 13 (6), 1030–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathersul, D., McDonald, S., & Rushby, J.A. (2013). Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35 (6), 655–668.Google Scholar
McClure, E. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (3), 424–453.Google Scholar
McDonald, S., English, T., Randall, R., Longman, T., Togher, L., & Tate, R.L. (2013). Assessing social cognition and pragmatic language in adolescents with brain injuries. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19, 1–11.Google Scholar
McDonald, S., & Flanagan, S. (2004). Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: Interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication. Neuropsychology, 18 (3), 572–579.Google Scholar
McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Martin, I., & Saunders, C. (2004). The ecological validity of TASIT: A test of social perception. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14, 285–302.Google Scholar
McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., & Rollins, J. (2011). The Awareness of Social Inference Test (Revised). Sydney, Australia: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18, 219–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, S., & Saunders, J.C. (2005). Differential impairment in recognition of emotion across different media in people with severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11 (4), 392–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milligan, K., Astington, J.W., & Dack, L.A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78 (2), 622–646.Google Scholar
Pettit, G.S., Dodge, K.A., & Brown, M.M. (1988). Early family experience, social problem solving patterns, and children's social competence. Child Development, 59 (1), 107–120.Google Scholar
Rankin, K.P., Salazara, A., Gorno-Tempinia, M.L., Sollbergera, M., Wilson, S.M., Pavlica, D., . . . Miller, B.L. (2009). Detecting sarcasm from paralinguistic cues: Anatomic and cognitive correlates in neurodegenerative disease Neuroimage, 47, 2005–2015.Google Scholar
Rosenberg-Kima, R.B., & Sadeh, A. (2010). Attention, response inhibition, and face-information processing in children: The role of task characteristics, age, and gender. Child Neuropsychology, 16 (4), 388–404.Google Scholar
Sparks, A., McDonald, S., Lino, B., O’Donnell, M., & Green, M.J. (2010). Social cognition, empathy and functional outcome in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 122, 172–178.Google Scholar
Stronach, S.T., & Turkstra, L.S. (2008). Theory of mind and use of cognitive state terms by adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 22 (10), 1054–1070.Google Scholar
Taylor, S.J., Barker, L.A., Heavey, L., & McHale, S. (2013). The typical developmental trajectory of social and executive functions in late adolescence and early adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1253–1265.Google Scholar
Tonks, J., Williams, H.W., Frampton, I., Yates, P., & Slater, A. (2007a). Assessing emotion recognition in 9–15-year-olds: Preliminary analysis of abilities in reading emotion from faces, voices and eyes. Brain Injury, 21 (6), 623–629.Google Scholar
Tonks, J., Williams, W.H., Frampton, I., Yates, P., & Slater, A. (2007b). Reading emotions after child brain injury: A comparison between children with brain injury and non-injured controls. Brain Injury, 21 (7), 731–739.Google Scholar
Turkstra, L.S. (2008). Conversation-based assessment of social cognition in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 22 (5), 397–409.Google Scholar
Turkstra, L.S., McDonald, S., & DePompei, R. (2001). Social information processing in adolescents: Data from normally developing adolescents and preliminary data from their peers with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16 (5), 469–483.Google Scholar
Vetter, N.C., Leipold, K., Kliegel, M., Phillips, L.H., & Altgassen, M. (2013). Ongoing development of social cognition in adolescence. Child Neuropsychology, 19 (6), 615–629.Google Scholar
Wiig, E.H., & Secord, W. (1989). Test of language competence – expanded edition. San Antonio, Texas: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Williams, L.M., Mathersul, D., Palmer, D.M., Gur, R.C., Gur, R.E., & Gordon, E. (2009). Explicit identification and implicit recognition of facial emotions: I. Age effects in males and females across 10 decades. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31 (3), 257–277.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13 (1), 103–128.Google Scholar
Winner, E., & Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: understanding the speaker's second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 257–270.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O., Bigler, E.D., Dennis, M., Gerhardt, C.A., Rubin, K.H., Stancin, T., . . . Vannatta, K. (2007). Social outcomes in childhood brain disorder: A heuristic integration of social neuroscience and developmental psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 133 (3), 535–556.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O., Schultz, L.H., & Selman, R.L. (1991). The development of interpersonal negotiation strategies in thought and action: A social-cognitive link to behavioral adjustment and social status. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly (1982–), 37 (3), 369–405.Google Scholar