Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:02:25.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trends of Catholic Thought on The Continent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Amidst the turmoils of the war, of which the Eternal City itself has become one of. the centres, the Holy Father has issued two Encyclicals devoted entirely to subjects interest in which is apparently confined to theologians. These are the Encyclical oh biblical studies and the earlier Mystici corporis Christi. The encouragement given through the first of these Encyclicals to the study of Holy Scripture is of the greatest significance with regard to countries which, in that respect, still labour under ideas formed during the Penal times. But what interest to these is the refutation of certain theological errors as given in the Encyclical Mystici Corporis? Where, in English Catholic literature, have the excesses of the liturgical movement or the exaggerations of the teaching on the mystical Body of Christ, referred to in that Encyclical, been advocated?

The passages in which the Encyclical concerns itself with those errors clearly refer to the Continent, in particular to Central Europe. If we regard the spiritual position of German-speaking Catholics as one of the most important points in the reconstruction of Europe and its Christian tradition, those errors gain in topical significance. The history of Catholic theology and philosophy of the 19th century reveals two main influences. The one, mainly concerning philosophy and dogma, originated from the philosophical movement known as German idealism. Far from being confined to Germany, however, it comprised, in its very origin and foundation, at least France as well. It influenced not only German Catholics whose teachings the Church condemned, such as Hermes, Guenther, Frohschammer and in later years Schell, but also French and Italian thinkers including Lammenais, Bautain and Rosmini.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1944 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 Die religiösen Sinndeutung der Gegenwart aus der Vergangenheit für die Zukunft. (Benziger: Einsiedeln, Köln, 1941.)

2 Otto Kuss, Die Theologie des Neuen Testamentes. (Pustet, Regensburg. 1936.) Leo v. Rudloff, O.S.B., Kleine Laiendogmatik. Ibid., 6th edition (17th thousand), 1936. 1936.)Ratholische Christenfibel (Bachem, Köln, 1937.) The Institute also published an excellent selection of dogmatic texts from the Fathers, and an abbreviated translation of Denzinger's Enchiridion.

3 Otto Muller, Salzburg, 1939. Jakob Hegner said: ‘I read the manuscript during one night and accepted it within twenty‐four hours.’ The book has 350 closely printed pages!

4 Schoenere Zukunft, vol. xiv (1939), p. it, 74–77.

5 Scholastik, 1940, No. I, pp. 1–14.

6 Schoenere Zukunft, vol. xv (1940), p. 54.

7 The expression ‘form of thinking’ is borrowed from contemporary non‐Catholic philosophers, notably Professor Leisegang, who wrote not only a book bearing that title, but also a study on Gnosis. Soine authors such as Dilthey and Spranger distinguish ‘religious thinking’ from other forms of equal right, such as military, economic, aesthetic thinking. Leisegang, on the other hand, distinguishes, in the history of Christian religion, various forms of thinking, such as St. Paul's circular, St. Thoma's antinomous and Hegel's triangular form of thinking. There is no objective truth beyond in either case.

8 Pinsk, Die Sakramentale Welt. Heiligung der Welt, 1938.