No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Shall We Lose Our Schools?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2024
Extract
A Priest remarked recently that the education authorities had no intention of taking away their schools from Catholics, but merely of making it impossible for them to be continued. In that he was only expressing what has become obvious to everyone who has had much to do with the administration of the Education Act of 1944.
First, there are questions of conscience to trouble the teacher. Morally he or she is responsible to the parents; legally to the education authority. Already problems are being posed that make for conflict between the two loyalties. The teacher’s duty is clear; the choice may not appear similar to that which faced St John Fisher and St Thomas More, but it becomes so when it is a question of refusal to sacrifice principles that are rooted in the Faith. The penalty for refusing may not be so great, but as time goes on the testing may well become more severe.
There has been reason for disturbance in the proposed Schools ‘Record Card’. This has been described as a ‘secret dossier’. It was recommended by the Report of the Committee on the Juvenile Employment Service, and its basic suggestions were accepted by the Government, and have begun to be implemented by some local authorities. The Report required comprehensive information about every child, including not only his or her attainments but details about character, use of leisure, and a report on the home and parents. This was described as ‘a highly confidential document’. One form issued bore the heading that it would ‘under no circumstances be communicated to parents’.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1948 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 Now called the Youth Employment Officer. Under some local education authorities, there is a Vocational Guidance Officer.
2 A record card is now being introduced to satisfy the requirements of Section 13 of the Employment and Training Act, 1948. The Act states that a parent or guardian shall be entitled to examine the particulars furnished by the school in the presence of ‘the officer having the custody thereof, but shall not be entitled ‘to receive or take copies thereof. The Act makes no provision for a compulsory interview of pupils leaving school by Youth Employment or Vocational Guidance Officers. Parents should be made aware of their rights to refuse the interview for their children.
3 Already this possibility seems envisaged. Subsection (4) of Section 13 of the Employment and Training Act, 1948, states: ‘If any person contravenes or fails to comply with any requirement imposed on him by regulations made under this section, he shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding ten pounds’.