No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Place of Science in Modern Culture
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2024
Extract
Natural science is concerned with understanding the working of material nature. The subject of this paper is the positive contribution which natural science, given its true place among the other activities of man, might make to the world. At the outset, it is essential to distinguish between science and the applications of science. When a certain knowledge of nature has been won, it is often possible to apply it to the control and manipulation of nature—to devise new techniques for handling matter. Modern industry is becoming more and more dominated by technology based in this way on applied science. The emphasis on the use of science in modern life is such that most of those who write on the ‘place of science in society’ are thinking primarily of the place of technics in society, and treat science only in relation to technics. But the question of the place of technics in society raises problems wholly different from that of the place of science in society, and a lack of clear distinctions here can lead to a wholly false conceptions of the functions of science. That technics (which presupposes science) will be of major importance to this nation, it is impossible to deny; that science has significance only as a basis for material prosperity is not, however, a legitimate conclusion. Science is concerned with understanding nature, not with manipulating it for economic purposes. The great human problems centreing round the rapid growth of industrial technology must here be left aside, as being only indirectly, connected with the functions of science in modern culture.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1945 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
Footnotes
From a paper delivered to the Newman Associatioon Conference at Ampleforth, August. 1944.
References
2 It may be noted that the primacy lies with thought; experiments are undertaken for the sake of understanding, not vice versa. This agrees with the philosophical. tradition of Plato, Aristotle, and St. Thomas, and not with ‘ activism,’ which exalts action above contemplation.
3 Cf. J. R. Baker, The Scientific Life.
4 Obviously I am here dealing only with studies in so far as they depend on natural reason alone, and not on revelation?that is, theology and all dependent studies are excluded from consideration.
5 Cf. Maritain, Science and Wisdom; Heydon, The God of Reason.
6 That scientific training is in practice often narrowing, and that scientists in real life are commonly less cultured than they should be, must be blamed not on study of the scientific microcosm but on neglect of the macrocosm. Many scientists are conspicuously lacking in the qualities which science ought to promote, because their education has been over-specialised. Reform of the education of scientists is overdue.
7 von Hugel, Mystical Element of Religion, vol. ii, p. 349.