No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Philosophical Categories
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2024
Extract
To supply the lack of a detailed treatise on the categories in English, Dom Augustine Osgniach has written this substantial book, supplementing his exposition of scholastic doctrine with critical studies of the historical fate of the ideas of substance, quantity, quality, relation. The method is well chosen, since the historico-critical studies bring into play the relevance to the fundamental problems of human thought of the scholastic doctrines in question; whereas a bald exposition modelled upon such Latin text-books as, e.g., Gredt (Elementa Philosophiae Aristotelico-Thomisticae), may indeed lay before readers what St. Thomas and his commentators taught, but will hardly gain access for that teaching into their minds without the support of an oral pedagogy. Not only does the method followed in this book secure the relevance of scholastic principles, but it enables the author to give them accurate development to a point which would perhaps weary’ the most hardy reader if reference to the later developments of philosophy were less constant and less close.
Perhaps the chief source of modern distrust of the categories is the fear, not by any means without foundation in the later developments of scholasticism, that the logical order is usurping the order of reality and imposing upon the real a system and framework of divisions and dependences which properly belong to the mode of our mind’s knowing and not to the mode of existence of things.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1940 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 The Analysis of Objects, Or, The Four Principal Categories. Dom . Augustine J. Osgniach, O.S.B., M.A., Ph.D. (Joseph F. Wagner Inc., New York; B. Herder, London; Pp. xiii and 302; n.p.).
2 Cf. Cajetan: In De Ente et Essentia. P. M.-H. Laurent. Pp. 143. Octavo differunt quia prima compositio (materiae et formae) est compositio ex his et ideo fit ibi unum tertium. Secunda vero (essentiae et existentiae) est compositio cum his. Nulla enim res datur quae constet ex essentia et existentia, proprie loquendo, sicut datur res constans ex materia et forma ; sed essentia componit cum existentia et e converso, et ideo dictum est quod adunantur per se, non tarneii componendo tertium.