Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:30:45.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mysticism and Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The publication of the collected spiritual letters of the late Abbot Chapman reveals a side of his life and work less well known to the outside world. With the exception of one rather long series, these letters are mainly concerned with those stages of the spiritual life which St. John of the Cross has called the Dark Night of the Soul. In their preoccupation with this time of dryness and painful anxiety when no comfort is found either in God or in creatures, they present a rather gloomy view of Christianity. Dom Chapman had formed the opinion that many reach the mystical state without being aware of it, and that for lack of suitable instruction they make no progress. He tried to help, although always refusing to become a “professional director,” and disclaiming special knowledge. The letters contain much that is helpful, expressed with originality and vigour.

He first began to take a serious interest in the subject of mysticism when recalled to Maredsous by Abbot Marmion in 1912—indeed his own state of soul seemed “obviously mystical"—and the first of the letters date from that period. Very soon he had worked out for himself a provisional theory, which he explained at length in a letter of April, 1913 (P-25°)« and in January, 1928, he published in the Downside Review an article “What is Mysticism?” as a theological defence of his ideas. To explain the scattered references in the letters, that article has been reprinted to form the second appendix to the present work. It is exclusively an interpretation of St. Thomas, but it is so novel an interpretation that, put forward with the authority of a great reputation, it requires careful examination. Dom Chapman sets aside the accepted Thomistic doctrine based on the theology of the Gifts of the Holy Ghost ("a harmless doctrine, but unfruitful"—p. 71) and starts again from the beginning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1935 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 The Spiritual Letters of Dom John Chapman, Sheed & Ward, 8/6.

2 See particularly q. 110, a. 2, but the distinction is used explicitly throughout the treatise.

3 For example a. 3 concludes: “Therefore the gifts of the Holy Ghost are habits which dispose man to give prompt obedience to the Holy Spirit.”

4 On pp. 298–9, under the heading “The Thomistic Epistemology,” Dom Chapman says that angels know God by means of species impressae; it is not St. Thomas' teaching, cf. Summa I, q. 56, a. 3.

5 Vide, e.g., Summa I, q. 84, a. 7.

6 Ibid., q. 100, a. 1 ad 2.

7 He had already urged (p. 300) that the soul is radically capable of pure intellectual knowledge from the fact that a disembodied soul understands without sense‐images. St. Thomas' teaching (Summa I, q. 89, a. 1) is that such souls understand in a manner that is not natural to man precisely because they exist in a manner that is not natural.

8 Dom Chapman is mistaken in thinking that St. Thomas is quoting the words from pseudo‐Dionysius.

9 Similarly in a footnote he gives a confirmatory passage from Qu. unica de Anima, a. 15. He should have continued the quotation. In the next sentence St. Thomas says that not until the soul is totally separated from the body will it be able to understand without sense‐images.

10 In the passage Qu. de Veritate XII, a. 12 ad 2) quoted in the second footnote on the same page (303) St. Thomas' “percipitur” which Dom Chapman has translated “perceived,” means “received,” as it does in the ad sextum of the Article.