Article contents
The Greeks in the Council of Florence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2024
Extract
The history of the ecclesiastical breach between East and West, and of the attempt to heal it, is very long and obscure. There was the Photian schism of the middle of the ninth century, but that was over within a few years. Two centuries later the Patriarch Cerularius was excommunicated by an over-zealous papal legate and retaliated in kind; but that quarrel was not final. The Fourth Crusade captured Christian Constantinople and never went any further, but set up a Latin kingdom there which lasted less than sixty years and did as much to antagonize the Greeks as anything else. Yet, a little more than ten years after he regained his throne, the restored Greek Emperor—but not the Greek Church—had accepted the Latin faith and union in the Second Council of Lyons (1274). His purpose, however, was political, to win the Pope’s help to prevent any attempt to re-establish the Latin kingdom of Constantinople.
From then on over the next century, whenever Constantinople was more in danger than usual by reason of the rapid advance of the Turks, the Byzantine emperors approached the pope of the time, as head of western Christendom. They asked for military aid, and they offered the possibility of union of the Churches through the medium of a general council. The offer was, of course, a sort of bribe, but not entirely so. Both East and West sincerely deplored the schism that divided them and would have wholeheartedly welcomed a genuine union.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1960 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
Footnotes
This article by the author of The Council of Florence, which the Cambridge University Press published last year, appeared first, in Italian, in La Civiltá Cattolica.
References
2 ‘We decree and declare, with the assent of the said Emperor and Patriarch and of all those here in the present synod, that it is a holy, universal, that is ecumenical, synod in this city of Ferrara. . . . Given in Ferrara in a general synodal session celebrated in the cathedral church of Ferrara. ...’
3 ‘We should have preferred indeed that this universal Council, which we initiated in this city, should have continued in the same…. But with the approval of our most dear son, John Palaeologus, Emperor of the Greeks, and of our venerable brother Joseph, Patriarch of Constantinople, and with the approbation of the sacred Council, as from now we transfer and declared transferred this ecumenical, that is universal, synod from this city of Ferrara to the city of Florence . . . with those securities and safe-conducts which we extended to all in the beginning of the sacred Council. . . .’
- 2
- Cited by