No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Eric Gill: A Retrospect
IV—The Driving Out of the Money‐Changers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2024
Extract
Eric had an engagingly boyish, at times almost infantile, sense of humour. He delighted in a stock of comic stories which he retailed with inexhaustible relish both for their formal nearness and for their garnered wisdom. Among these was a dialogue between three men in a railway-carriage:—
First man: ‘What lights are those?’
Second man: ‘They’re the lights of Hanwell.’
First man: ‘How strange they look!’
Third man: ‘Not half so strange as the lights of the train look from Hanwell!’
Perhaps this unassuming little allegory may enlighten the chequered history of the Money-changers from its thwarted beginnings in 1916 to its recent and painful aftermath in 1949.
rA representation of the turning-out of the money-changers has been chosen for a war memorial, for it commemorates the most just of all wars—the war of Justice against Cupidity—a war raged by Christ Himself.’
The sculptor had long dreamed of a great monument which should embody this struggle and at the same time be his crowning achievement. The original design—for a bronze group in the round—done in 1916 for a competition as a monument for L.C.C. employees, was rejected. It may be seen reproduced in Eric Gill published by Ernest Benn in 1927; it is also extant in a wood engraving. The upsurging rhythm of this bronze group is finer than the more geometrical movement of the relief ultimately carved in stone at Leeds.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1951 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
21 Eric Gill: Welfare Handbook No. 10 / War Memorial / printed and published at S. Dominic’s Press, / Ditchling, Sussex, A.D. MCMXXIII.
22 Reproduced on p. 23.
23 Michael Sadleir. / Michael Ernest Sadler./ (Sir Michael Sadier, K.C.S.I.). / 1861-1943./ A Memoir by his son / Constable, London / first published 1949, p. 222.
24 Note and its subject: important in view of subsequent developments.
25 E.G: op. cit. No 66.
26 E.G: op. cit. No 86.
27 E.G: op. cit. No 119.
28 Michael Sadleir: op. cit. p. 238.
29 E.G: op. cit. No 112.
30 E.G: op. cit. No 115.
31 E.G: op. cit. No 113.
32 in Eric Gill: Workman, p. 9. [see note 5].
33 see note 21.
34 cf. Blackfriars February 1941 Eric Gill Memorial Number.
35 ‘Art… is a rhetorical activity’: Ananda Coomaraswamy quoted by E.G. in Last Essays / Jonathan Cape / first published 1942 / p. 9.
‘Rhetoric. . . thought of… as effective communication’ Coomaraswamy, ibid. p. 18, note.
36 ‘What is a work of art? A word made flesh… A word, that which emanates from mind. Made flesh; a thing, a thing seen, a thing known, the immeasurable translated into terms of the measurable. From the big best to the lowest that is the substance of works of art. And it is a rhetorical activity.’ E.G. op. cit. pp. 19-20.