Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T09:48:36.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Discernment of Motes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2024

Extract

The opinion that it is impossible to make moral judgments about other people is sufficiently widespread amongst Christians to be worth attacking. It is of course a Christian doctrine that it is hardly ever my business to pass adverse moral judgments on people, but that is an entirely different matter. It is Christian teaching that I am very rarely justified in killing a man by shooting him with a gun, but we ought not to confuse this with the theory that it is impossible to kill a man by shooting him with a gun. In practice the latter theory will lead to a whole lot of death; similarly the theory that moral judgments are impossible leads to a whole lot of slander.

The theory is that while we can judge the behaviour of a man and say whether his external actions are good ones or bad ones, we cannot penetrate to his soul to see if he himself is good or bad. I can say that Peter did something that was ‘objectively’ or ‘materially’ wrong, but only God can say whether Peter was ‘subjectively’ or ‘formally’ committing a sin.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable