Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T14:44:47.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Early Anti-Christian Calumny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2025

Extract

Readers of Wiseman’s Fabiola will remember how when Corvinus tries to provoke Pancratius to a quarrel he calls the Christian boy “a cowardly worshipper of an ass’s head.” The author explains in a footnote that this was one of the many calumnies against the Christians that were current in pagan Rome. Now, most lies have some slight foundation in truth. Even the deliberate inventor of a calumny looks round for some reality that can be distorted into a seeming confirmation of his story. And it will sometimes happen that when there is enough ill-will to make men keenly watchful for something that can be made the basis of an accusation, they more or less honestly make mistakes and unconsciously misrepresent and misapply real facts.

There is some reason for believing that the pagans of the early centuries who circulated this story of the worship of an ass’s head by the Christians were thus maliciously blundering. Strange to say, the cultus of an Egyptian god seems to supply the key to an answer for the puzzling question as to how it was that this calumny ever gained credence, not merely among the ignorant crowd, but also amongst the educated men of the time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1921 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* In his “ Ode on the Nativity,” in the verses describing the panic flight of the heathen deities:

“ The brutish gods of Nile as fast,

Isis and Orus and the dog Anubis haste.”

* i.e.,

* The writer of the article “ Graffiti ” in the Catholic Encyclopedia states that among the Palatine discoveries there has been “ in a chamber adjoining another inscription of the same class proclaiming Alexamenos a Christian (Alexamenos fidelis).” This, however, is not necessarily conclusive. I suggest that “ fidelis ” may be used and is used in other senses than that which it acquired among Christians in the second century; and, further, that the Gnostics continually used or misused Christian terms, giving them a meaning of their own, and the word may mean here only that the subject of the inscription had been initiated.